• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating the implementation of the Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 from service user and healthcare professionals' perspectives: a questionnaire study.从服务使用者和医疗保健专业人员的角度评估《拯救婴儿生命护理包第2版》的实施情况:一项问卷调查研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Sep 2;14(3):e003456. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003456.
2
Service users' experiences of maternity care in England informed by the Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle Version 2: A reflexive thematic analysis.基于拯救婴儿生命护理包第2版的英格兰服务使用者的产科护理体验:一项反思性主题分析
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018582.
3
Glycaemic control in labour with diabetes: GILD, a scoping study.糖尿病产妇分娩期间的血糖控制:GILD,一项范围界定研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(41):1-150. doi: 10.3310/KHGD2761.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Evaluation of the NHS England Low-Calorie Diet implementation pilot: a coproduced mixed-method study.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)低热量饮食实施试点评估:一项联合开展的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(29):1-63. doi: 10.3310/MPRT2139.
6
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
7
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
8
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
9
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
10
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.

本文引用的文献

1
IMplementation of the Preterm Birth Surveillance PAthway: a RealisT evaluation (The IMPART Study).早产监测路径的实施:一项现实评估(IMPART研究)
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 May 21;5(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00594-9.
2
A qualitative exploration of the experiences of pregnant women living with obesity and accessing antenatal care.对肥胖孕妇的产前护理体验的定性探索。
PLoS One. 2024 May 3;19(5):e0302599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302599. eCollection 2024.
3
Quality and reporting of large-scale improvement programmes: a review of maternity initiatives in the English NHS, 2010-2023.大规模改进计划的质量和报告:对 2010-2023 年英国国民保健制度中产科举措的审查。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Oct 18;33(11):704-715. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016606.
4
Perinatal excellence to reduce injury in preterm birth (PERIPrem) through quality improvement.通过质量改进实现围产期卓越以减少早产损伤(PERIPrem)。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Aug;11(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001904.
5
OASI2: a cluster randomised hybrid evaluation of strategies for sustainable implementation of the Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle in maternity units in Great Britain.OASI2:一项针对英国产科单位中产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包可持续实施策略的集群随机混合评估。
Implement Sci. 2021 May 22;16(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01125-z.
6
Stillbirth rates, service outcomes and costs of implementing NHS England's Saving Babies' Lives care bundle in maternity units in England: A cohort study.英国国民保健制度 Saving Babies' Lives 护理包在英格兰产科单位的实施效果、服务结果和成本:队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 19;16(4):e0250150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250150. eCollection 2021.
7
Women's experiences of a diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.女性妊娠期糖尿病诊断体验的系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 7;20(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2745-1.
8
The effects of care bundles on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.护理捆绑对患者结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 29;12(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0670-0.
9
Aspirin versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia.阿司匹林与安慰剂用于有早产先兆子痫高危风险的妊娠。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):613-622. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704559. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
10
Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries.死产:高收入国家的行动呼吁。
Lancet. 2016 Feb 13;387(10019):691-702. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01020-X. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

从服务使用者和医疗保健专业人员的角度评估《拯救婴儿生命护理包第2版》的实施情况:一项问卷调查研究。

Evaluating the implementation of the Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 from service user and healthcare professionals' perspectives: a questionnaire study.

作者信息

Widdows Kate, Reid Holly, Smith Debbie M, Wood-Harper Rebecca, Camacho Elizabeth, Roberts Stephen A, Heazell Alexander E P

机构信息

Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Sep 2;14(3):e003456. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003456.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003456
PMID:40897464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12410671/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle (SBLCB) was introduced in England in 2015 and was updated in 2019 (SBLCBv2). This study aimed to describe the degree to which SBLCBv2 was implemented in practice and describe contemporary experiences of receiving and delivering antenatal and intrapartum care informed by the recommendations of SBLCBv2.

METHODS

This cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted in 28 National Health Service maternity units across England between October and December 2023. The study had two arms, one for maternity service users and one for healthcare professionals. Maternity service users aged ≥16 years who had given birth in the last 12 months were invited to participate in an online survey which contained closed questions about elements of the SBLCBv2, and two free-text questions about their experiences of receiving antenatal and intrapartum care. Maternity healthcare professionals from participating sites were invited to complete a separate questionnaire about delivering care. Responses were summarised by descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

1140 women and 633 healthcare professionals participated. The majority of staff reported implementing all five elements of SBLCBv2, though this varied from 57% (prevention of preterm birth) to 99% (smoking cessation). Service users frequently reported receiving interventions that were part of SBLCBv2: 26% were offered Aspirin and 97% monitored fetal movement. Staff generally reported positive experiences of implementing the SBLCBv2, feeling that it supported clinical decision making. 89% and 86% of service users reported a positive experience in pregnancy and labour, respectively. This was underpinned by positive staff attitudes, behaviours and communication, and being listened to and involved in decisions about care.

CONCLUSIONS

SBLCBv2 has been integrated into clinical practice, though some elements require additional focus to increase implementation (e.g., preterm birth). Maternity staff may benefit from additional training to discuss the reasons for and results of interventions to reduce the risk of pregnancy complications.

摘要

引言

“拯救婴儿生命护理包”(SBLCB)于2015年在英国推出,并于2019年进行了更新(SBLCBv2)。本研究旨在描述SBLCBv2在实际中的实施程度,并描述根据SBLCBv2的建议接受和提供产前及产时护理的当代经验。

方法

2023年10月至12月期间,在英格兰的28个国民保健服务产科单位进行了这项横断面问卷调查研究。该研究分为两个部分,一部分针对产妇服务使用者,另一部分针对医疗保健专业人员。邀请过去12个月内分娩的16岁及以上产妇服务使用者参与在线调查,调查包含关于SBLCBv2要素的封闭式问题,以及两个关于她们接受产前和产时护理经历的自由文本问题。邀请参与站点的产科医疗保健专业人员填写一份关于提供护理的单独问卷。通过描述性统计对回答进行总结。

结果

1140名女性和633名医疗保健专业人员参与了研究。大多数工作人员报告实施了SBLCBv2的所有五个要素,不过实施比例从57%(预防早产)到99%(戒烟)不等。服务使用者经常报告接受了属于SBLCBv2一部分的干预措施:26%的人被提供了阿司匹林,97%的人监测了胎动。工作人员普遍报告在实施SBLCBv2方面有积极的经验,认为它有助于临床决策。分别有89%和86% 的服务使用者报告在孕期和分娩时有积极的体验。这得益于工作人员积极的态度、行为和沟通,以及她们被倾听并参与护理决策。

结论

SBLCBv2已被纳入临床实践,不过一些要素需要更多关注以提高实施率(例如早产)。产科工作人员可能会从额外的培训中受益,以讨论干预措施的原因和结果,以降低妊娠并发症的风险。