• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用带或不带人工脱矿的尸体椎体测量椎弓根螺钉的拔出强度。

Pullout strength of pedicle screws using cadaveric vertebrae with or without artificial demineralization.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongduk-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Spine J. 2021 Sep;21(9):1580-1586. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.010
PMID:33872804
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the differences in the pullout strength and displacement of pedicle screws in cadaveric thoracolumbar vertebrae with or without artificial demineralization.

METHODS

Five human lumbar and five thoracic vertebrae from one cadaver were divided into two hemivertebrae. The left-side specimens were included in the simulated osteopenic model group and the right-side bones in a control group. In the model group, we immersed each specimen in HCl (1 N) solution for 40 minutes. We measured bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computerized tomography. We inserted polyaxial pedicle screws into the 20 pedicles of the cadaveric lumbar and thoracic spine after measuring the BMD of the 2 hemivertebrae of each specimen. We measured the pullout strength and displacement of the screws before failure in each specimen using an Instron system.

RESULTS

The average pullout strength of the simulated osteopenic model group was 76% that of the control group. In the control and model groups, the pullout strength was 1678.87±358.96 N and 1283.83±341.97 N, respectively, and the displacement was 2.07±0.34 mm and 2.65±0.50 mm, respectively (p<.05). We detected positive correlations between pullout strength and BMD in the control group and observed a negative correlation between displacement and BMD in the model group.

CONCLUSIONS

By providing an anatomically symmetric counterpart, the human cadaveric model with or without demineralization can be used as a test bed for pullout tests of the spine. In the simulated osteopenic model group, pullout strength was significantly decreased compared with the untreated control group.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Decreased bone mineral density may significantly reduce the pullout strength of a pedicle screw, even though the range is osteopenic rather than osoteoporotic.

摘要

目的

评估去矿化前后胸腰椎尸体标本椎弓根螺钉拔出强度和位移的差异。

方法

从一具尸体的 5 个腰椎和 5 个胸椎中,将每个椎体分为左右两半。左侧标本纳入模拟骨质疏松模型组,右侧标本纳入对照组。模型组将每个标本的骨组织浸泡在 1N 的 HCl 溶液中 40 分钟。测量每对半椎体的骨密度(BMD),并用双能 X 射线吸收法和定量计算机断层扫描法测量。在每对半椎体测量 BMD 后,将多轴椎弓根螺钉插入 20 个腰椎和胸椎椎弓根。使用 Instron 系统测量每个标本螺钉拔出前的拔出强度和位移。

结果

模拟骨质疏松模型组的平均拔出强度为对照组的 76%。在对照组和模型组中,拔出强度分别为 1678.87±358.96 N 和 1283.83±341.97 N,位移分别为 2.07±0.34 mm 和 2.65±0.50 mm(p<.05)。我们在对照组中检测到拔出强度与 BMD 之间存在正相关,在模型组中观察到位移与 BMD 之间存在负相关。

结论

通过提供解剖对称的对照,去矿化和未去矿化的人体尸体模型可作为脊柱拔出试验的测试平台。在模拟骨质疏松模型组中,与未处理的对照组相比,拔出强度显著降低。

临床意义

骨密度降低可能会显著降低椎弓根螺钉的拔出强度,即使范围是骨质疏松而不是骨质疏松症。

相似文献

1
Pullout strength of pedicle screws using cadaveric vertebrae with or without artificial demineralization.使用带或不带人工脱矿的尸体椎体测量椎弓根螺钉的拔出强度。
Spine J. 2021 Sep;21(9):1580-1586. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
2
Intraoperative lateral wall breach simulation in the cadaveric spine and the impact of thread designs of screws on pullout strength in the osteoporotic thoracic vertebrae: A biomechanical study in human cadavers.尸体脊柱中的术中侧墙破裂模拟以及骨质疏松性胸椎中螺钉螺纹设计对拔出强度的影响:人体尸体的生物力学研究。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2024 Jan;58(1):57-61. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2024.22067.
3
Adjustment of suboptimally placed lumbar pedicle screws decreases pullout strength and alters biomechanics of the construct: a pilot cadaveric study.调整位置欠佳的腰椎椎弓根螺钉会降低拔出强度并改变内固定装置的生物力学:一项尸体研究初步报告
World Neurosurg. 2015 Mar;83(3):368-75. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.04.065. Epub 2014 May 2.
4
Evaluation of pullout strength and failure mechanism of posterior instrumentation in normal and osteopenic thoracic vertebrae.评估正常胸椎和骨质疏松性胸椎后路内固定系统的拔出强度和失败机制。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Oct;13(4):469-76. doi: 10.3171/2010.4.SPINE09764.
5
Pullout strength of misplaced pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae - A cadaveric study.胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入位置不当的拔出强度——一项尸体研究。
Indian J Orthop. 2013 May;47(3):238-43. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.111502.
6
Direct vertebral rotation significantly decreases the pullout strength of the pedicle screw: a biomechanical study in adult cadavers.直接椎体旋转显著降低椎弓根螺钉的拔出强度:成人尸体的生物力学研究。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2021 May 1;30(3):230-234. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000751.
7
Characteristics of immediate and fatigue strength of a dual-threaded pedicle screw in cadaveric spines.尸体脊柱中双螺纹椎弓根螺钉即刻和疲劳强度的特点。
Spine J. 2013 Aug;13(8):947-56. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
8
Revision of cannulated and perforated cement-augmented pedicle screws: a biomechanical study in human cadavers.空心钉和带孔骨水泥增强椎弓根螺钉翻修:人体尸体的生物力学研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 1;35(19):E932-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6ec60.
9
Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.敲击置入扭矩有助于预测更好的椎弓根螺钉固定和最佳螺钉尺寸选择。
Spine J. 2013 Aug;13(8):957-65. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
10
Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws.标本固定方法对椎弓根螺钉拔出试验的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 May 1;21(9):1037-44. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199605010-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical insights into anterolateral vertebral screw fixation in osteoporotic spines: a comparative study of fixation methods and positions using porcine vertebrae.骨质疏松性脊柱前路椎体螺钉固定的生物力学见解:使用猪椎体对固定方法和位置的比较研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 10;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05452-5.
2
Comparison of midline lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar degeneration disease.对比治疗腰椎退行性疾病的经椎间孔腰椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22154. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73213-1.
3
Are modular pedicle screws associated with a high complication rate following posterior spinal fixation?
在脊柱后路固定术后,模块化椎弓根螺钉与高并发症发生率相关吗?
J Spine Surg. 2023 Jun 30;9(2):133-138. doi: 10.21037/jss-22-99. Epub 2023 Apr 10.