• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

膝关节翻修术:低手术量能否实现良好的效果?

Revision knee arthroplasty: Can good outcomes be achieved at lower volumes?

机构信息

Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Knee. 2021 Jun;30:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2021.03.012
PMID:33873087
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Joint Registry (NJR) demonstrates a re-revision rate for primary knee arthroplasty of 14.2% at 7 years. The 2015 Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) report highlighted that 58% of surgeons undertaking revision knee arthroplasty (RKA) performed fewer than five cases per year. It has been suggested that revision cases be centralised in specialist centres with a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. Such a hub and spoke or cluster models may still require revision surgery to be performed at relatively low volume units.

METHODS

An analysis of RKA surgery performed in a four surgeon, lower volume revision knee unit over 10 years to December 2016 was undertaken. The effect of the introduction of a MDT was reviewed. The minimum follow up was two years. The primary outcome measure was re-revision. Hospital data as well as individual surgeon NJR reports were used to ensure all re-revisions were accounted for. Outcome scores were available for 68% of cases.

RESULTS

There were 192 RKAs performed in 187 patients at a mean (stdev) of 6.3 (5.4) years from the index procedure. The mean age at surgery was 68.2 (10.9) years. Twenty nine (15.5%) patients had died at the time of final review. Twelve (6.3%) cases required a further revision procedure. The commonest complication was stiffness requiring MUA. The overall 7 year survivorship was 94.9% (95% CI 90.2-97.3). The mean Oxford score at 5.4 years was 30.4 (10.4).

CONCLUSIONS

RKA can be reliably performed at lower volume centres with appropriate MDT systems in place.

摘要

背景

国家联合登记处(NJR)显示,初次膝关节置换术后 7 年的再翻修率为 14.2%。2015 年“首次正确治疗”(GIRFT)报告强调,58%的进行膝关节翻修术(RKA)的外科医生每年完成的手术少于 5 例。有人建议将翻修手术集中在具有多学科团队(MDT)方法的专业中心进行。这种中心辐射或集群模式可能仍然需要在相对低容量的单位进行翻修手术。

方法

对 4 名外科医生在一个低容量的膝关节翻修单位进行的 10 年来的 RKA 手术进行了分析,该单位于 2016 年 12 月结束。对 MDT 的引入效果进行了回顾。最低随访时间为两年。主要观察指标为再翻修。使用医院数据和每位外科医生的 NJR 报告,以确保所有再翻修都被记录在案。有 68%的病例获得了结果评分。

结果

187 名患者中有 192 例接受了 RKA,平均(标准差)从初次手术到再次手术为 6.3(5.4)年。手术时的平均年龄为 68.2(10.9)岁。截至最终审查时,29 例(15.5%)患者死亡。12 例(6.3%)患者需要进一步的翻修手术。最常见的并发症是需要行关节松解术的僵硬。7 年总体生存率为 94.9%(95%可信区间为 90.2-97.3)。5.4 年时的平均牛津评分是 30.4(10.4)。

结论

在适当的 MDT 系统到位的情况下,低容量中心可以可靠地进行 RKA。

相似文献

1
Revision knee arthroplasty: Can good outcomes be achieved at lower volumes?膝关节翻修术:低手术量能否实现良好的效果?
Knee. 2021 Jun;30:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Provision of revision knee surgery and calculation of the effect of a network service reconfiguration: An analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.提供膝关节翻修手术,并计算网络服务重新配置的效果:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家联合登记处的分析。
Knee. 2020 Oct;27(5):1593-1600. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.07.094. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
3
Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements.中心和外科医生手术量影响单髁膝关节置换术后的翻修率:23400 例内侧骨水泥固定单髁膝关节置换的分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Apr 17;95(8):702-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00520.
4
Implications of the getting it right first time initiative for regional knee arthroplasty services.首次正确执行计划对区域膝关节置换服务的影响。
Knee. 2017 Oct;24(5):1191-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
5
Optimal usage of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 41,986 cases from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.单髁膝关节置换术的最佳应用:对来自英格兰和威尔士国家关节注册中心的41986例病例的研究。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Nov;97-B(11):1506-11. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.35551.
6
Revision of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty to Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is It as Good as a Primary Result?单髁膝关节置换翻修为全膝关节置换:其结果是否与初次置换一样好?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S105-S108. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.023. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
7
Effect of Surgical Caseload on Revision Rate Following Total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.全膝关节和单髁膝关节置换术后手术量对翻修率的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jan 6;98(1):1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00487.
8
Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Has Fewer Complications but Higher Revision Rates Than Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Study of Large United States Databases.在一项对美国大型数据库的研究中,单髁膝关节置换术比全膝关节置换术并发症更少,但翻修率更高。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1617-1625. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
9
Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is the Main Cause of Failure for Modern Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 11,134 Knees.人工关节周围感染是现代膝关节置换术失败的主要原因:对11134例膝关节的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2194-2201. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5396-4. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
Outcomes After Metal-on-metal Hip Revision Surgery Depend on the Reason for Failure: A Propensity Score-matched Study.金属对金属髋关节翻修手术后的结果取决于失败原因:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):245-258. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000029.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes, complications, and survivorship for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients aged 80 years and older with isolated medial knee osteoarthritis: a matched cohort analysis.80 岁及以上单纯内侧膝关节骨关节炎患者行单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术的临床结果、并发症和生存率:匹配队列分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6371-6379. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04916-9. Epub 2023 May 27.
2
Primary Total Knee Replacement: A Recipe for Dry Dressing.初次全膝关节置换术:一份干性敷料的配方。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 19;15(4):e37820. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37820. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Revision total knee replacement case-mix at a major revision centre.
一家大型翻修中心的全膝关节置换翻修病例组合
J Exp Orthop. 2022 Apr 14;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40634-022-00462-2.
4
Low annual hospital volume of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is not associated with higher revision rates.前交叉韧带重建术的年手术量较低与较高的翻修率无关。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 May;30(5):1575-1583. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06655-z. Epub 2021 Jul 8.