• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医学中的 2 型糖尿病 - 一项焦点小组研究。

Type 2 diabetes in general practice - a focus-group study.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2021 Apr 7;141(6). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0623. Print 2021 Apr 20.

DOI:10.4045/tidsskr.20.0623
PMID:33876623
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Diabetes Plan 2017-21 has implemented measures to improve diagnosis and follow-up of persons with type 2 diabetes by the primary health services. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences and thoughts of Norwegian general practitioners (GPs) with regard to diagnosis and follow-up of this patient group.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

In this qualitative study, three focus-group interviews were conducted with a total of 17 GPs. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using systematic text condensation.

RESULTS

The GPs reported having a busy daily schedule that rarely allowed for targeted identification of patients in the risk zone to be prioritised. They described a patient-centred diabetes care, in which motivating for lifestyle change was considered a necessary but demanding task. The doctors identified the need to find a balance between following the general clinical guidelines on the one hand and individually adapting the follow-up to each patient on the other. Furthermore, the participants reported being less updated on current medical knowledge than they wanted, due to time constraints.

INTERPRETATION

The GPs in the study described a patient-centred diabetes care that was driven by clinical experience. The guidelines have an advisory, but not mandatory function. This approach enables personalised and adapted treatment, but could also be a contributory cause of the failure to provide sufficient follow-up as required by the national guidelines.

摘要

背景

2017-2021 年国家糖尿病计划实施了措施,以改善初级卫生服务机构对 2 型糖尿病患者的诊断和随访。本研究的目的是探讨挪威全科医生(GP)在诊断和随访该患者群体方面的经验和想法。

材料与方法

在这项定性研究中,对 17 名全科医生进行了三次焦点小组访谈。对访谈进行了录音、转录和系统文本浓缩分析。

结果

全科医生报告说,他们的日常工作很忙,几乎没有时间有针对性地确定处于危险区域的患者进行优先排序。他们描述了一种以患者为中心的糖尿病护理,他们认为激励生活方式的改变是一项必要但要求很高的任务。医生们发现,一方面需要在遵循一般临床指南和另一方面根据每个患者的情况个别调整随访之间找到平衡。此外,由于时间限制,参与者报告说他们对当前医学知识的了解不如他们希望的那么多。

解释

研究中的全科医生描述了一种以患者为中心的糖尿病护理,由临床经验驱动。这些指南具有咨询作用,但不是强制性的。这种方法可以实现个性化和适应性的治疗,但也可能是导致未能按照国家指南要求提供足够随访的一个原因。

相似文献

1
Type 2 diabetes in general practice - a focus-group study.全科医学中的 2 型糖尿病 - 一项焦点小组研究。
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2021 Apr 7;141(6). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0623. Print 2021 Apr 20.
2
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
3
Applying clinical guidelines in general practice: a qualitative study of potential complications.在全科医疗中应用临床指南:对潜在并发症的定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 22;17:92. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0490-3.
4
Why do doctors in Norway choose general practice and remain there? A qualitative study about motivational experiences.为什么挪威的医生选择全科医学并留在那里?一项关于动机体验的定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Jun;38(2):184-191. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1753348. Epub 2020 May 12.
5
The experiences of Chinese general practitioners in communicating with people with type 2 diabetes-a focus group study.中国全科医生与 2 型糖尿病患者沟通的体验——一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Jul 19;22(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01506-9.
6
The roles of healthcare professionals in diabetes care: a qualitative study in Norwegian general practice.医疗保健专业人员在糖尿病护理中的作用:挪威普通实践中的定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Mar;38(1):12-23. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1714145. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
Increasing workload in Norwegian general practice - a qualitative study.挪威全科医生工作量增加——一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 May 21;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0952-5.
8
General practitioners' strategies in consultations with immigrants in Norway-practice-based shared reflections among participants in focus groups.挪威全科医生与移民会诊时的策略——焦点小组参与者基于实践的共同思考
Fam Pract. 2018 Mar 27;35(2):216-221. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx097.
9
Managing barriers to empathy in the clinical encounter: a qualitative interview study with GPs.应对临床诊疗中同理心的障碍:一项针对全科医生的定性访谈研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Dec;66(653):e887-e895. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687565. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
10
How can task shifting put patient safety at risk? A qualitative study of experiences among general practitioners in Norway.任务转换如何会给患者安全带来风险?挪威全科医生经验的定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Mar;38(1):24-32. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1714143. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Academic Detailing Compared with Group Meetings to Change Drug Prescribing for Type 2 Diabetes-A Randomized Controlled Trial.学术推广与小组会议对2型糖尿病药物处方改变的比较——一项随机对照试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Dec;39(16):3243-3252. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09014-z. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Patient activation in adults attending appointments in general practice: a cross-sectional study.成人在普通科门诊就诊时的患者激活:一项横断面研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jul 10;24(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02102-9.
3
Undiagnosed diabetes: Prevalence and cardiovascular risk profile in a population-based study of 52,856 individuals. The HUNT Study, Norway.
未诊断的糖尿病:在挪威 HUNT 研究中对 52856 个人进行的基于人群的研究中的患病率和心血管风险特征。
Diabet Med. 2022 Jun;39(6):e14829. doi: 10.1111/dme.14829. Epub 2022 Mar 21.