• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟草烟雾和电子烟气溶胶成分的风险评估:剂量指标的实用选择。

Risk assessment of components in tobacco smoke and e-cigarette aerosols: a pragmatic choice of dose metrics.

机构信息

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Inhal Toxicol. 2021 Feb;33(3):81-95. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2021.1909678. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1080/08958378.2021.1909678
PMID:33876709
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk assessment of individual tobacco smoke components is important for the purpose of prioritization or selecting chemicals for monitoring products. Smoking is characterized by a highly varying, intermittent exposure and the challenge is to choose the most appropriate dose metric.

METHODS

Generally, average daily exposure estimates are used as dose metric, without considering temporal determinants. The applicability hereof is discussed in the context of choosing dose metrics for local respiratory tract effects and for systemic effects in a smoking scenario or for the use of e-cigarettes.

RESULTS

Using average daily exposure estimates for the smoking scenario can lead to erroneous risk evaluations for several reasons. Inhaled peak air concentrations during a puff can be two to three orders of magnitude higher than the calculated average daily inhaled concentration, which may impact the assessment of both systemic and local health effects. A pragmatic risk assessment is proposed, based on the Margin of Exposure (MoE) approach. The choice of an appropriate dose metric, such as inhaled concentration, inhaled dose or absorbed dose, depends on the type of effect. Temporal characteristics should be considered in the final step of the MoE approach, as is illustrated by two cases, glycerol and benzene.

CONCLUSION

The choice of an appropriate dose metric and inclusion of temporal determinants are important aspects in the risk assessment of individual smoke components. The proposed MoE approach provides the opportunity to weigh smoking-related exposure characteristics during the final step of the risk evaluation.

摘要

背景

对个体烟草烟雾成分进行风险评估对于确定优先事项或选择用于监测产品的化学物质非常重要。吸烟的特点是暴露高度变化且间歇性,挑战在于选择最合适的剂量指标。

方法

通常,平均每日暴露估计值被用作剂量指标,而不考虑时间决定因素。在此背景下,讨论了选择局部呼吸道效应和吸烟情况下全身效应或电子烟使用的剂量指标的适用性。

结果

由于几个原因,在吸烟情况下使用平均每日暴露估计值可能会导致错误的风险评估。在一口烟期间吸入的峰值空气浓度可能比计算得出的平均每日吸入浓度高两到三个数量级,这可能会影响对全身和局部健康影响的评估。基于暴露量(MOE)方法,提出了一种实用的风险评估方法。合适的剂量指标的选择,如吸入浓度、吸入剂量或吸收剂量,取决于影响类型。在 MOE 方法的最后一步中应考虑时间特征,甘油和苯的两个案例说明了这一点。

结论

选择合适的剂量指标并纳入时间决定因素是个体烟雾成分风险评估的重要方面。所提出的 MOE 方法提供了在风险评估的最后一步中权衡与吸烟相关的暴露特征的机会。

相似文献

1
Risk assessment of components in tobacco smoke and e-cigarette aerosols: a pragmatic choice of dose metrics.烟草烟雾和电子烟气溶胶成分的风险评估:剂量指标的实用选择。
Inhal Toxicol. 2021 Feb;33(3):81-95. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2021.1909678. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 6: 90-day OECD 413 rat inhalation study with systems toxicology endpoints demonstrates reduced exposure effects of a mentholated version compared with mentholated and non-mentholated cigarette smoke.烟草加热系统2.2的评估。第6部分:采用系统毒理学终点指标的经合组织413大鼠90天吸入研究表明,与含薄荷醇和不含薄荷醇的卷烟烟雾相比,含薄荷醇版本的烟草加热系统暴露效应更低。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Nov 30;81 Suppl 2:S93-S122. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
3
The fate of an inhaled cigarette puff in the human respiratory tract.吸入香烟烟雾在人体呼吸道中的命运。
Inhal Toxicol. 2024 Jul;36(6):378-390. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2024.2367419. Epub 2024 Jun 23.
4
Cancer potencies and margin of exposure used for comparative risk assessment of heated tobacco products and electronic cigarettes aerosols with cigarette smoke.用于加热型烟草制品和电子烟气溶胶与香烟烟雾比较风险评估的癌症潜能和接触阈。
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Jan;95(1):283-298. doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02924-x. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Characterisation of a smoke/ aerosol exposure in vitro system (SAEIVS) for delivery of complex mixtures directly to cells at the air-liquid interface.用于在气液界面直接将复杂混合物递送到细胞的体外烟雾/气溶胶暴露系统(SAEIVS)的特性描述。
J Appl Toxicol. 2023 Jul;43(7):1050-1063. doi: 10.1002/jat.4442. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
6
Reduced Exposure to Harmful and Potentially Harmful Smoke Constituents With the Tobacco Heating System 2.1.使用烟草加热系统2.1可减少接触有害和潜在有害烟雾成分
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Feb;19(2):168-175. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw164. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
7
Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 7: Systems toxicological assessment of a mentholated version revealed reduced cellular and molecular exposure effects compared with mentholated and non-mentholated cigarette smoke.烟草加热系统2.2的评估。第7部分:对含薄荷醇版本的系统毒理学评估显示,与含薄荷醇和不含薄荷醇的香烟烟雾相比,其细胞和分子暴露效应有所降低。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Nov 30;81 Suppl 2:S123-S138. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
8
E-cigarette aerosols induce lower oxidative stress in vitro when compared to tobacco smoke.与烟草烟雾相比,电子烟烟雾在体外诱导的氧化应激较低。
Toxicol Mech Methods. 2016 Jul;26(6):465-476. doi: 10.1080/15376516.2016.1222473.
9
Cigarette smoke but not electronic cigarette aerosol activates a stress response in human coronary artery endothelial cells in culture.香烟烟雾而非电子烟气溶胶可激活培养的人冠状动脉内皮细胞中的应激反应。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Jun 1;163:256-60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
10
A novel application of the Margin of Exposure approach: segregation of tobacco smoke toxicants.暴露差距方法的新应用:烟草烟雾毒物的隔离。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2011 Nov;49(11):2921-33. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Effects of e-Cigarette Aerosol Extracts and Tobacco Cigarette Smoke Extracts on RAW264.7 Cells.电子烟气溶胶提取物和香烟烟雾提取物对RAW264.7细胞影响的评估。
ACS Omega. 2023 Aug 1;8(32):29336-29345. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02758. eCollection 2023 Aug 15.
2
Impact of different ventilation conditions on tobacco smoke-associated particulate matter emissions in a car cabin using the TAPaC platform.利用 TAPaC 平台研究不同通风条件对车内烟草烟雾相关颗粒物排放的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 22;13(1):8216. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35208-2.
3
Preliminary toxicological assessment of heated tobacco products: A review of the literature and proposed strategy.
加热烟草制品的初步毒理学评估:文献综述及拟议策略
Toxicol Rep. 2023 Jan 20;10:195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2023.01.008. eCollection 2023.
4
Oxidative Stress and Air Pollution: Its Impact on Chronic Respiratory Diseases.氧化应激与空气污染:对慢性呼吸道疾病的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 3;24(1):853. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010853.
5
Smoking-Associated Exposure of Human Primary Bronchial Epithelial Cells to Aldehydes: Impact on Molecular Mechanisms Controlling Mitochondrial Content and Function.吸烟相关的人原发性支气管上皮细胞暴露于醛类:对控制线粒体含量和功能的分子机制的影响。
Cells. 2022 Nov 3;11(21):3481. doi: 10.3390/cells11213481.
6
Methodological Approaches for Risk Assessment of Tobacco and Related Products.烟草及相关产品风险评估的方法学途径
Toxics. 2022 Aug 24;10(9):491. doi: 10.3390/toxics10090491.