Suppr超能文献

整合基于理论和数据驱动的方法进行个案概念化:一种具有生态瞬时评估的功能分析方法。

Integrating theory-based and data-driven methods to case conceptualization: A functional analysis approach with ecological momentary assessment.

机构信息

Pain and Psychotherapy Research Lab, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Landau in der Pfalz, Germany.

出版信息

Psychother Res. 2022 Jan;32(1):65-77. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2021.1916639. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Abstract

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and network analysis are promising empirical developments for psychotherapy research and practice, but they lack a therapeutic rationale that could guide case conceptualization and treatment planning. We developed an assessment strategy that aims to assess functional analysis with EMA. The assessment strategy was applied to a series of three N-of-1 assessments in a proof-of-concept study. After selecting a personalized set of items, EMA was implemented with three measurement time points per day for a period of 30 days. The participants evaluated feasibility and acceptance. Practicing psychotherapists discussed clinical implications in a focus group. The implementation of the assessment strategy seemed feasible and accepted; participants did not report any side effects. Principal component and network analyses indicated interpretable components (e.g., participant 1: hopelessness, procrastination, coping, avoidance). The focus group pointed out potentials (e.g., efficient profit of the waiting time, empowering patients) and challenges (e.g., prioritize and interpret all the information). The presented assessment strategy may enhance the scientific quality of case conceptualization empowering therapists' decision-making regarding treatment planning. At the same time, it is a concrete demonstration of the challenges that need to be addressed in future research.

摘要

生态瞬时评估(EMA)和网络分析是心理治疗研究和实践中很有前途的实证发展,但它们缺乏治疗学的基本原理,无法指导案例概念化和治疗计划。我们开发了一种评估策略,旨在通过 EMA 评估功能分析。该评估策略已应用于一项概念验证研究中的一系列三个 N-of-1 评估中。在选择了个性化的一组项目后,每天进行三次测量,持续 30 天。参与者评估了可行性和可接受性。执业心理治疗师在焦点小组中讨论了临床意义。评估策略的实施似乎是可行和可接受的;参与者没有报告任何副作用。主成分和网络分析表明有可解释的成分(例如,参与者 1:绝望、拖延、应对、回避)。焦点小组指出了潜力(例如,有效利用等待时间,赋予患者权力)和挑战(例如,优先考虑和解释所有信息)。提出的评估策略可以提高案例概念化的科学质量,增强治疗师在治疗计划方面的决策能力。同时,它也是未来研究中需要解决的挑战的具体体现。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验