• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗原和分子检测用于 Sars-CoV-2 及相关变异株检测的比较分析:一项 4266 份样本研究。

Comparative analysis of antigen and molecular tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants: A study on 4266 samples.

机构信息

Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy; Genomic Medicine Laboratory UILDM, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179 Rome, Italy.

Genomic Medicine Laboratory UILDM, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, 00179 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:187-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.048. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.048
PMID:33878460
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8053214/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The present study compared the performance of the Lumipulse G Sars-CoV-2 Ag kit with the TaqPath COVID-19 RT-PCR CE IVD kit.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 4266 naso-oropharyngeal swabs. Samples were subjected to antigen RT-PCR tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants. Statistical analyses were conducted in R software.

RESULTS

We found 503 positives (including 138 H69-V70 deletion carriers) and 3763 negatives by RT-PCR, whereas 538 positives and 3728 negatives were obtained by antigen testing. We achieved empirical and binormal AU-ROCs of 0.920 and 0.990, accuracy of 0.960, sensitivity of 0.866, specificity of 0.973, positive and negative predictive values of 0.810 and 0.980. We obtained a positive correlation between viral loads and antigen levels (R = 0.81), finding a complete concordance for high viral loads (log copies/mL > 5.4). Antigen levels > 222 pg/mL were found to be reliable in assigning positive samples (p < 0.01). Concerning variant carriers, antigen test detected them with the same accuracy as other positive samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular and antigen tests should be evaluated regarding the prevalence of the area. In case of low prevalence, antigen testing can be employed as a first-line screening for the timely identification of affected individuals with high viral load, also if carriers of Sars-CoV-2 variants.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了 Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag 试剂盒与 TaqPath COVID-19 RT-PCR CE IVD 试剂盒的性能。

方法

本研究共纳入 4266 例鼻咽拭子样本。对样本进行抗原 RT-PCR 检测,以检测 SARS-CoV-2 及相关变异株。统计分析在 R 软件中进行。

结果

通过 RT-PCR 检测到 503 例阳性(包括 138 例 H69-V70 缺失携带者)和 3763 例阴性,而抗原检测得到 538 例阳性和 3728 例阴性。我们获得了经验和双正态 AU-ROC 分别为 0.920 和 0.990、准确率为 0.960、灵敏度为 0.866、特异性为 0.973、阳性和阴性预测值分别为 0.810 和 0.980。我们发现病毒载量与抗原水平之间存在正相关关系(R = 0.81),对于高病毒载量(log 拷贝/mL > 5.4),发现完全一致。抗原水平 > 222 pg/mL 被认为可以可靠地将阳性样本分类(p < 0.01)。对于变异株携带者,抗原检测与其他阳性样本的检测结果具有相同的准确性。

结论

分子和抗原检测应根据检测地区的流行情况进行评估。在低流行率的情况下,抗原检测可作为一线筛查方法,及时识别具有高病毒载量的受感染个体,也可识别 SARS-CoV-2 变异株携带者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8703/8053214/6460a1b64348/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8703/8053214/6460a1b64348/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8703/8053214/6460a1b64348/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis of antigen and molecular tests for the detection of Sars-CoV-2 and related variants: A study on 4266 samples.抗原和分子检测用于 Sars-CoV-2 及相关变异株检测的比较分析:一项 4266 份样本研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:187-189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.048. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
2
Comparison of automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen test for COVID-19 infection with quantitative RT-PCR using 313 nasopharyngeal swabs, including from seven serially followed patients.比较 313 例鼻咽拭子(包括 7 例连续随访患者)的自动化 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与定量 RT-PCR 对 COVID-19 感染的检测结果。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;99:397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
3
Comparison of Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 Assay, Easy SARS-CoV-2 WE and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19.采用自动化系统比较 Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 检测试剂盒、Easy SARS-CoV-2 WE 检测试剂盒和 Lumipulse 定量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒在 COVID-19 诊断中的性能。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;113:113-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.069. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
Feasibility and Effectiveness Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Antigenic Tests in Mass Screening of a Pediatric Population and Correlation with the Kinetics of Viral Loads.新型冠状病毒抗原检测在儿科人群大规模筛查中的可行性和有效性评估及其与病毒载量动力学的相关性。
Viruses. 2021 Oct 14;13(10):2071. doi: 10.3390/v13102071.
5
Prospective study of 1308 nasopharyngeal swabs from 1033 patients using the LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 antigen test: Comparison with RT-qPCR.1033 例患者 1308 份鼻咽拭子的前瞻性研究:LUMIPULSE SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测与 RT-qPCR 的比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
6
Evaluation of Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay automated test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP) in nasopharyngeal swabs for community and population screening.Lumipulse® G SARS-CoV-2抗原检测法用于社区和人群筛查中检测鼻咽拭子中SARS-CoV-2核衣壳蛋白(NP)的自动化检测评估。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:391-396. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.098. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay evaluation using clinical samples from different testing groups.使用来自不同检测组的临床样本对 Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag 检测试剂盒进行评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Apr 7;59(8):1468-1476. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0182. Print 2021 Jul 27.
8
Clinical validation of quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen assays to estimate SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in nasopharyngeal swabs.临床验证定量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测法以估计鼻咽拭子中的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Apr;27(4):613-616. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.11.021. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
9
Comparison of Roche and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19.罗氏和罗氏 Lumipulse 定量 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测系统用于 COVID-19 诊断的性能比较。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:263-269. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.067. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
10
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Rapid Antigen and by Three Commercial RT-qPCR Tests: A Study from Martin University Hospital in Slovakia.比较斯洛伐克马丁大学医院使用快速抗原和三种商业 RT-qPCR 检测 SARS-CoV-2 的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 1;18(13):7037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137037.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical literature review and pooled analysis of diagnostic accuracy of Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2 antigen test for diagnosing acute SARS-CoV-2 infections.关于Ortho VITROS SARS-CoV-2抗原检测诊断急性SARS-CoV-2感染诊断准确性的批判性文献综述与汇总分析。
J Med Biochem. 2022 Oct 15;41(4):540-548. doi: 10.5937/jomb0-36107.
2
Performance of Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新型冠状病毒抗原检测试验的性能:系统评价与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 4;12(6):1388. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061388.
3
Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Detection: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.
用于新冠病毒检测的快速抗原检测的诊断准确性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 7;9:870738. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.870738. eCollection 2022.
4
LumiraDX SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Test for Diagnosing Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Critical Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.用于诊断急性严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型感染的LumiraDX严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型抗原检测:关键文献综述与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 11;12(4):947. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040947.
5
Tracking the Initial Diffusion of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant in Italy by RT-PCR and Comparison with Alpha and Delta Variants Spreading.通过逆转录聚合酶链反应追踪严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2奥密克戎变异株在意大利的早期传播,并与阿尔法和德尔塔变异株的传播情况进行比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 11;12(2):467. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020467.
6
Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.用于新冠病毒诊断的快速抗原检测性能:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 4;12(1):110. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010110.
7
Accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: A living systematic review and meta-analysis.新型 SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速诊断准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Aug 12;18(8):e1003735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003735. eCollection 2021 Aug.