School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2000 Simcoe St N, Oshawa, ON, L1G 0C5, Canada.
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Dec;31(4):675-698. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-09975-6. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
Purpose We conducted a systematic review to understand the impact that return-to-work coordinators (RTWCs) have on return to work (RTW) outcomes for sick/injured workers. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ABI Inform were searched from January 1, 2000 to September 16, 2020. Of 2,927 retrieved and screened citations, 14 quantitative articles fulfilled the eligibility and quality criteria. Quality assessment, data extraction, and evidence synthesis followed article screening. Results We focused on the impact of RTWCs for outcomes of work absence, RTW rates, quality of life, and cost-benefit. Our final synthesis included 14 articles. We found strong evidence that work absence duration was reduced when workers had face-to-face contact with a RTWC. As well, there was strong evidence linking face-to-face RTWC interventions with higher RTW rates and moderate evidence that this reduced intervention costs. RTWC interventions involving the identification of barriers and facilitators to RTW also showed promising results. However, only limited evidence was found that RTWCs improved quality of life for workers. Conclusions Our synthesis identifies key features of RTW interventions that improve RTW outcomes. Future high-quality research should measure long-term outcomes of RTWC interventions to evaluate sustainability and consider the nature of work. They should also focus on RTWC impact on worker quality of life assessments and for older workers and workers with chronic health conditions.
目的 我们进行了一项系统评价,以了解重返工作岗位协调员 (RTWC) 对患病/受伤工人重返工作岗位 (RTW) 结果的影响。
方法 从 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 16 日,我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 ABI Inform 上进行了搜索。在检索和筛选出的 2927 篇文献中,有 14 篇定量文章符合资格和质量标准。质量评估、数据提取和证据综合遵循文章筛选。
结果 我们专注于 RTWC 对缺勤、RTW 率、生活质量和成本效益结果的影响。我们的最终综合包括 14 篇文章。我们发现,当工人与 RTWC 进行面对面接触时,工作缺勤时间减少了,这方面有强有力的证据支持。同样,有强有力的证据表明,面对面的 RTWC 干预措施与更高的 RTW 率有关,并且有中等强度的证据表明,这降低了干预成本。涉及识别 RTW 障碍和促进因素的 RTWC 干预措施也显示出有希望的结果。然而,只有有限的证据表明 RTWC 提高了工人的生活质量。
结论 我们的综合分析确定了改善 RTW 结果的 RTW 干预的关键特征。未来高质量的研究应衡量 RTWC 干预的长期结果,以评估可持续性,并考虑工作的性质。它们还应侧重于 RTWC 对工人生活质量评估以及对老年工人和患有慢性健康状况的工人的影响。