Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Universidade Federal Fluminense. Rio das Ostras, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Apr 9;74(1):e20200558. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0558. eCollection 2021.
to compare the social representations of reproductive biotechnologies among sexual and reproductive health nurses, and their links with professional practice.
an analytical, comparative, qualitative research, supported by the Theory of Social Representation, carried out in May/2014-February/2015, with 32 nurses from the city of Rio de Janeiro. Semi-structured interview, analyzed by ALCESTE® software.
nurses not active in assisted human reproduction represent reproductive biotechnologies as unnatural methods of human reproduction, assessing the practice in this field as generalist and bureaucratic. Those who work represent as auxiliary and supporting nature for heterosexual couples, considering the innovative and specialized practice.
each group presented specific contents and dimensions about reproductive biotechnologies. The representations are centered on moral, normative and ideological personal values, anchored in the traditional conceptions of human and family reproduction, but also collective, acquired in the professional routine, showing group identity and its distinct practices considering reproductive biotechnologies.
比较性健康和生殖健康护士对生殖生物技术的社会认知及其与专业实践的联系。
这是一项分析性、对比性的定性研究,以社会代表理论为支撑,于 2014 年 5 月至 2015 年 2 月在里约热内卢市对 32 名护士进行了研究。采用半结构式访谈,使用 ALCESTE®软件进行分析。
未参与辅助生殖的护士将生殖生物技术视为非自然的人类生殖方法,认为该领域的实践是通才和官僚主义的。而那些从事这方面工作的人则将其视为辅助和支持异性恋夫妇的技术,认为这是一种具有创新性和专业性的实践。
每个群体对生殖生物技术都提出了具体的内容和维度。这些代表集中在个人的道德、规范和意识形态价值观上,以传统的人类和家庭生殖观念为基础,同时也受到专业常规中获得的集体观念的影响,显示出群体认同及其对生殖生物技术的不同实践。