Cancer Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
Chris O´Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6399-6409. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06162-4. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
The high prevalence of malnutrition in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) negatively impacts outcomes. The best-available evidence has been published in clinical nutrition guidelines; however, translation into practice has lagged.
This project aimed to explore multidisciplinary team (MDT) clinicians' perspectives regarding barriers and enablers to best-practice nutrition care in order to inform the design of a new model of care.
Qualitative interviews were conducted with clinicians who were purposively sampled from a major HNC tertiary referral centre in Sydney, Australia. To elicit information regarding barriers and facilitators to change, a semi-structured interview schedule was developed, interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed employing an inductive thematic approach. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide data analysis and interpretation of key themes identified.
Nineteen participants (11 supportive care and eight medical clinicians) representing allied health, medical, and nursing disciplines participated. Five key themes were identified: (1) acknowledgement of dietetics expertise and access to resources to deliver nutrition care; (2) proactive versus reactive nutrition care; (3) integrated and coordinated care-"The One Stop Shop"; (4) MDT favours the medical model; and (5) leadership-within disciplines, within the MDT.
MDT clinicians expressed similar views regarding delivering optimal nutrition care to this high nutritional risk patient group. However, perspectives differed at times between medical and supportive care clinicians, attributable to perceptions that current service structure favours the medical model. In order to design and deliver an evidence-based model of care, specific strategies will be required to ensure: early and ongoing access to expert nutrition care; nutrition care processes are proactive; integrated and coordinated care; and leadership, both intra- and inter-disciplinary. This novel exploration of MDT clinicians' views provides supporting evidence that multi-component implementation strategies comprising individual, team and system-level approaches will be essential to leverage sustainable change.
头颈部癌症(HNC)患者的营养不良高发率对治疗结果产生负面影响。最佳可用证据已在临床营养指南中公布;然而,将其转化为实践仍存在滞后。
本项目旨在探讨多学科团队(MDT)临床医生对最佳营养护理实践的障碍和促进因素的看法,以便为新的护理模式设计提供信息。
对来自澳大利亚悉尼一家主要的 HNC 三级转诊中心的 MDT 临床医生进行了定性访谈。为了了解变革的障碍和促进因素,制定了半结构化访谈方案,对访谈进行了逐字转录,并采用归纳主题方法进行分析。采用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)指导数据分析和关键主题的解释。
共有 19 名参与者(11 名支持治疗和 8 名医疗临床医生)代表了联合健康、医疗和护理学科。确定了五个关键主题:(1)承认营养师的专业知识和获取资源以提供营养护理;(2)主动与被动营养护理;(3)整合和协调护理-“一站式服务”;(4)MDT 倾向于医学模式;(5)学科内和 MDT 内的领导力。
MDT 临床医生对为这个高营养风险患者群体提供最佳营养护理表达了类似的看法。然而,有时医疗和支持治疗临床医生之间的观点存在差异,这归因于对当前服务结构有利于医学模式的看法。为了设计和提供基于证据的护理模式,需要采取具体策略来确保:及早和持续获得专家营养护理;营养护理过程具有前瞻性;整合和协调护理;以及领导力,包括学科内和跨学科。对 MDT 临床医生观点的这种新颖探索提供了支持性证据,表明多组分实施策略包括个人、团队和系统层面的方法对于推动可持续变革至关重要。