• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个人态度或经验?哪些因素影响居民对混合收入社区的接受度?

Personal attitude or experience? Which factors influence residents' acceptance of mixed-income communities?

机构信息

Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan, South Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Apr 23;16(4):e0250511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250511. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0250511
PMID:33891648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8064591/
Abstract

Although many researchers and policy makers have argued that social mixing could contribute to sustainable communities, most people still prefer to live in a homogeneous rather than a diverse community. Considering the large gap between the political need for social mixing and people's preference, it is essential to understand residents' perceptions and preferences regarding socially-mixed neighborhoods in order to promote sustainable community development. This study explorers residents' willingness to accept living in mixed-income communities in Korea, with attention to various levels of income mix. This study conducted an online survey of 2,000 respondents living in seven metropolitan cities in Korea, including Seoul. The study aimed to investigate residents' comfortability and willingness to move into different mixed-income communities. The results showed that residents with higher openness to diversity are more likely to accept mixed-income communities, but frequent interaction with low-income people reduces higher-income people's willingness to accept mixed-income communities. As both personal attitudes and experience are important determinants of individuals' social mix preference, a more systematic community development strategy is required to achieve successful social mixing.

摘要

尽管许多研究人员和政策制定者认为社会融合有助于实现可持续社区,但大多数人仍然更愿意生活在同质化社区,而不是多元化社区。考虑到社会融合在政治上的必要性和人们的偏好之间存在巨大差距,了解居民对社会融合社区的看法和偏好对于促进可持续社区发展至关重要。本研究探讨了韩国居民接受混合收入社区的意愿,同时关注不同收入混合程度。本研究通过在线调查的方式对韩国七个大都市地区(包括首尔)的 2000 名居民进行了调查,旨在调查居民对不同混合收入社区的舒适度和入住意愿。结果表明,对多样性持更开放态度的居民更有可能接受混合收入社区,但与低收入人群的频繁互动会降低高收入人群接受混合收入社区的意愿。由于个人态度和经验都是影响个人社会融合偏好的重要因素,因此需要采取更系统的社区发展策略来实现成功的社会融合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/591c/8064591/3c6f87369f27/pone.0250511.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/591c/8064591/c5a6bd297c3f/pone.0250511.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/591c/8064591/81f8aaa8a0bc/pone.0250511.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/591c/8064591/3c6f87369f27/pone.0250511.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/591c/8064591/c5a6bd297c3f/pone.0250511.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/591c/8064591/81f8aaa8a0bc/pone.0250511.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/591c/8064591/3c6f87369f27/pone.0250511.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Personal attitude or experience? Which factors influence residents' acceptance of mixed-income communities?个人态度或经验?哪些因素影响居民对混合收入社区的接受度?
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 23;16(4):e0250511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250511. eCollection 2021.
2
Contingent Valuation of Residents' Attitudes and Willingness-to-Pay for Non-point Source Pollution Control: A Case Study in AL-Prespa, Southeastern Albania.居民对非点源污染控制的态度及支付意愿的条件价值评估:以阿尔巴尼亚东南部的阿尔-普雷斯帕为例
Environ Manage. 2015 Jul;56(1):81-93. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0480-6. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
3
Local Residents' Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed.当地居民对生态系统服务的认知:以丰河流域为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 26;16(19):3602. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193602.
4
The Impact of Emotional Solidarity on Residents' Attitude and Tourism Development.情感团结对居民态度和旅游发展的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 24;11(6):e0157624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157624. eCollection 2016.
5
Changing Neighborhoods and Residents' Health Perceptions: The Heart Healthy Hoods Qualitative Study.改变邻里环境和居民健康感知:心脏健康街区定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 31;15(8):1617. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081617.
6
Local social capital and the acceptance of Protected Area policies: an empirical study of two Ramsar river delta ecosystems in northern Greece.本地社会资本与保护区政策的接受度:希腊北部两个拉姆萨尔河口湿地生态系统的实证研究。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Apr 15;96(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.012. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
7
Using residents' perceptions to improve park-people relationships in Chatthin Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar.利用居民的认知来改善缅甸恰特野生动物保护区的人与公园的关系。
J Environ Manage. 2012 May 30;99:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
8
Relationship among pollution concerns, attitudes toward social problems, and environmental perceptions in abandoned sites using Bayesian inferential analysis.贝叶斯推断分析废弃场中污染问题关注度、社会问题态度和环境认知之间的关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Mar;26(8):8007-8018. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04272-5. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
9
Who avoids being involved in personal carbon trading? An investigation based on the urban residents in eastern China.谁回避参与个人碳交易?基于中国东部城镇居民的调查。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(32):43365-43381. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13537-x. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
10
Impact of gentrification on adult mental health.中产阶级化对成年人心理健康的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun;55(3):432-444. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13264. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring stigma experiences of scattered-site public housing residents and its characteristics based on social contact theory.基于社会接触理论探讨分散安置公租房居民的污名体验及其特征。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 7;19(11):e0313005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313005. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effect of Discrimination on Stress among Public Housing Residents: A Comparative Study between Social-Mix and Independent Public Housing Complexes.住房歧视对公共住房居民压力的影响:社会融合型和独立型公共住房的比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 17;17(18):6788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186788.
2
Intergroup contact theory.群体间接触理论
Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:65-85. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65.