• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管壁厚度是影响髂嵴以上输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石治疗成功的独立参数。

Ureteral wall thickness is an independent parameter affecting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in ureteral stones above the iliac crest.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Radiology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;75(7):e14264. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14264. Epub 2021 May 4.

DOI:10.1111/ijcp.14264
PMID:33891784
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate the relationship between ureteral wall thickness (UWT) and other variables of patients who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in the primary treatment of the ureteral stone above the iliac crest level.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 147 patients aged 18 years and older, who underwent SWL in our clinic between December 2016 and December 2019 for the treatment of ureteral stones above the iliac crest level and had non-contrast enhanced abdominal computed tomography scans before the procedure were included in the clinical study. The results were evaluated at 3 months after SWL. The absence of residual fragments was considered as stone-free status, and the existence of any size residual fragment was considered as treatment failure.

RESULTS

In our study, the mean age of the patients was 42.4 ± 12.8 years, and the stone-free rate was 92.5%. The median transverse stone size was 7.5 mm (min 2.8-max 15), and the median UWT was 4.2 mm (1-8.7). In the multivariate analysis, UWT (P = .002) and multiple stone presence (P = .027) were found to be independent factors affecting stone-free status. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal threshold value for UWT was determined as 5.25 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that UWT was the most important independent variable associated with increased failure in SWL treatment. The presence of multiple stones was another independent factor that increased the failure rates. Using SWL technology through experience accumulated with the mechanical hardware of the machine, we can select patients who are more suitable for this treatment and improve treatment outcomes.

摘要

背景

研究体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗髂嵴以上输尿管结石患者的输尿管壁厚度(UWT)与其他变量之间的关系。

材料与方法

本临床研究共纳入 147 例年龄在 18 岁及以上、因髂嵴以上输尿管结石于 2016 年 12 月至 2019 年 12 月在我院行 SWL 治疗且术前均行腹部非增强 CT 扫描的患者。结果在 SWL 后 3 个月进行评估。无残留碎片被认为是无结石状态,存在任何大小的残留碎片被认为是治疗失败。

结果

在本研究中,患者的平均年龄为 42.4±12.8 岁,无结石率为 92.5%。结石的中位横径为 7.5mm(最小 2.8mm,最大 15mm),UWT 的中位数为 4.2mm(1-8.7mm)。多变量分析显示,UWT(P=0.002)和多发结石(P=0.027)是影响无结石状态的独立因素。在受试者工作特征曲线分析中,UWT 的最佳截断值确定为 5.25mm。

结论

我们发现 UWT 是与 SWL 治疗失败增加最相关的独立变量。多发结石的存在是另一个增加失败率的独立因素。通过使用 SWL 技术和积累的机器机械硬件经验,我们可以选择更适合这种治疗的患者,提高治疗效果。

相似文献

1
Ureteral wall thickness is an independent parameter affecting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in ureteral stones above the iliac crest.输尿管壁厚度是影响髂嵴以上输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石治疗成功的独立参数。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;75(7):e14264. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14264. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
The association between ureteral wall thickness and need for additional procedures after primary ureteroscopy in patients with ureteral stones above the iliac crest.髂嵴以上输尿管结石患者行输尿管镜检查后输尿管壁厚度与需要附加手术的关系。
Aktuelle Urol. 2023 Feb;54(1):37-43. doi: 10.1055/a-1840-0682. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
3
A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.一种利用计算机断层扫描参数预测不同部位输尿管结石碎石术成功的新模型。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Mar;46(2):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.01.011. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
4
Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients.影响成人患者体外冲击波碎石术治疗大于 1cm 的近端输尿管结石成功率的因素。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Feb;49(1):51-56. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01186-7. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
5
Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.体外冲击波碎石术治疗尿路结石疾病后,通过计算机断层扫描结果评估成功预测情况。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Jan;47(1):69-73. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0857-0. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
6
Advantages of the supine transgluteal approach for distal ureteral stone extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: outcomes based on CT characteristics.仰卧经臀肌入路用于输尿管下段结石体外冲击波碎石术的优势:基于CT特征的结果
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Apr;69(2):189-194. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02741-7. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
7
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.一种用于预测儿童冲击波碎石术治疗结果的新列线图。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
8
Ureteral wall thickness as a predictor for non-invasive treatment success for steinstrasse. Can we save time?输尿管壁厚度作为 Steinstrasse 非侵入性治疗成功的预测指标。我们能否节省时间?
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 13;42(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04874-w.
9
Can shock wave lithotripsy lead to impaction of ureteral stones?冲击波碎石术会导致输尿管结石嵌顿吗?
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2023 Feb;75(1):85-91. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04278-8. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
10
Ureteral Wall Thickness as a Preoperative Indicator of Impacted Stones in Patients With Ureteral Stones Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.输尿管壁厚度作为输尿管结石患者行输尿管镜碎石术前结石嵌顿的指标
Urology. 2017 Aug;106:45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.04.047. Epub 2017 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing decision-making in shock wave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones: the role of radiological stone impaction markers.推进输尿管上段结石冲击波碎石术的决策制定:放射学结石嵌顿标志物的作用
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jul 17;53(1):139. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01797-y.
2
Predicting ESWL success for ureteral stones: a radiomics-based machine learning approach.预测输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的成功率:一种基于影像组学的机器学习方法。
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01817-8.
3
Finding the optimal candidate for shock wave lithotripsy: external validation and comparison of five prediction models.
寻找冲击波碎石术的最佳候选者:五个预测模型的外部验证和比较。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Apr 7;51(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01444-4.
4
Predicting narrow ureters before ureteroscopic lithotripsy with a neural network: a retrospective bicenter study.利用神经网络预测输尿管镜碎石术前的输尿管狭窄:一项回顾性的双中心研究。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Oct;50(5):599-610. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01341-2. Epub 2022 Jun 23.