• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推进输尿管上段结石冲击波碎石术的决策制定:放射学结石嵌顿标志物的作用

Advancing decision-making in shock wave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones: the role of radiological stone impaction markers.

作者信息

Popiolek Marcin, Jendeberg Johan, Olin Max, Wagenius Magnus, Sundqvist Pernilla, Lidén Mats

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Department of Urology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, 701 85, Sweden.

出版信息

Urolithiasis. 2025 Jul 17;53(1):139. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01797-y.

DOI:10.1007/s00240-025-01797-y
PMID:40676249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12271247/
Abstract

This work aims to evaluate whether radiological signs of stone impaction (RSSI) measured on non-contrast computed tomography (CT) can predict shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) outcomes for upper ureteral stones and to assess whether integrating these markers into an existing prediction model (the Niwa nomogram) improves predictive performance. We retrospectively analysed 256 patients treated with SWL for upper ureteral stones between 2012 and 2019. Standard stone parameters and RSSI, including ureteral wall thickness (UWT), ureteral diameters and CT attenuations above and below the stone, were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate predictive performance. The Niwa nomogram was enhanced by incorporating significant RSSI parameters and was internally validated using k-fold cross-validation. Maximum ureteral attenuation below the stone (UABSmax), ureter diameter above the stone (UDAS) and renal pelvis diameter (RPD) were found to be associated with SWL outcome. UABSmax had the highest individual predictive value (area under the curve (AUC) 0.66), while UWT showed no significant association or predictive value. Incorporating UABSmax and RPD into the Niwa nomogram (Niwa+) marginally increased AUC (0.72 vs. 0.71) but did not lead to significant improvements in NRI or DCA. In conclusion, certain RSSI- particularly UABSmax and RPD- were associated with SWL outcome but provided limited value when added to an already validated nomogram.

摘要

本研究旨在评估在非增强计算机断层扫描(CT)上测量的结石嵌顿的放射学征象(RSSI)能否预测输尿管上段结石的冲击波碎石术(SWL)效果,并评估将这些标志物纳入现有的预测模型(丹羽列线图)是否能提高预测性能。我们回顾性分析了2012年至2019年间接受SWL治疗的256例输尿管上段结石患者。评估了标准结石参数和RSSI,包括输尿管壁厚度(UWT)、输尿管直径以及结石上下方的CT衰减值。采用多变量逻辑回归、受试者工作特征(ROC)分析、净重新分类改善(NRI)和决策曲线分析(DCA)来评估预测性能。通过纳入显著的RSSI参数对丹羽列线图进行了改进,并使用k折交叉验证进行内部验证。发现结石下方的最大输尿管衰减值(UABSmax)、结石上方的输尿管直径(UDAS)和肾盂直径(RPD)与SWL效果相关。UABSmax具有最高的个体预测价值(曲线下面积(AUC)为0.66),而UWT未显示出显著关联或预测价值。将UABSmax和RPD纳入丹羽列线图(丹羽+)使AUC略有增加(0.72对0.71),但未导致NRI或DCA有显著改善。总之,某些RSSI——特别是UABSmax和RPD——与SWL效果相关,但添加到已验证的列线图中时提供的价值有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/0b250e5b98f5/240_2025_1797_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/b7cbbe164934/240_2025_1797_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/376378abdb0c/240_2025_1797_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/5d241a31684b/240_2025_1797_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/432a035160e6/240_2025_1797_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/57d3839aceae/240_2025_1797_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/0b250e5b98f5/240_2025_1797_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/b7cbbe164934/240_2025_1797_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/376378abdb0c/240_2025_1797_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/5d241a31684b/240_2025_1797_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/432a035160e6/240_2025_1797_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/57d3839aceae/240_2025_1797_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c46b/12271247/0b250e5b98f5/240_2025_1797_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Advancing decision-making in shock wave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones: the role of radiological stone impaction markers.推进输尿管上段结石冲击波碎石术的决策制定:放射学结石嵌顿标志物的作用
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jul 17;53(1):139. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01797-y.
2
Ureteral Stone Impaction with Its Possible Effects on the Outcomes of Endoscopic Management in Children: A Critical Evaluation with an Emphasis on Ureteral Wall Thickness.输尿管结石嵌顿及其对儿童内镜治疗结果的可能影响:以输尿管壁厚度为重点的批判性评估
J Endourol. 2025 Jul;39(7):652-658. doi: 10.1089/end.2024.0862. Epub 2025 May 30.
3
Predicting ESWL success for ureteral stones: a radiomics-based machine learning approach.预测输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的成功率:一种基于影像组学的机器学习方法。
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01817-8.
4
What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.输尿管镜术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的利弊:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):772-786. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children.儿童尿路结石治疗的医学及外科干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 2;6(6):CD010784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010784.pub2.
7
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
8
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
9
Ureteral Wall Thickness Is an Effective Predictor of Ureteral Stone Impaction and Management Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.输尿管壁厚度是预测输尿管结石嵌顿和治疗结局的有效指标:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2023 Sep;210(3):430-437. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003561. Epub 2023 May 26.
10
A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.一种利用计算机断层扫描参数预测不同部位输尿管结石碎石术成功的新模型。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Mar;46(2):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.01.011. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiological signs of stone impaction add no value in predicting spontaneous stone passage.影像学征象在预测结石自行排出方面并无价值。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Aug 6;52(1):114. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01604-0.
2
Ureteral Wall Thickness Is an Effective Predictor of Ureteral Stone Impaction and Management Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.输尿管壁厚度是预测输尿管结石嵌顿和治疗结局的有效指标:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2023 Sep;210(3):430-437. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003561. Epub 2023 May 26.
3
Finding the optimal candidate for shock wave lithotripsy: external validation and comparison of five prediction models.
寻找冲击波碎石术的最佳候选者:五个预测模型的外部验证和比较。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Apr 7;51(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01444-4.
4
The ratio of CT attenuation values of the ureter above/below ureteral stones is a useful preoperative factor for predicting impacted ureteral stones.输尿管内结石上下 CT 值比值是预测输尿管嵌顿结石的一个有用的术前因素。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Oct;50(5):643-649. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01354-x. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
5
Factors influencing stone-free rate of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL); a cohort study.影响体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)结石清除率的因素:一项队列研究。
Scand J Urol. 2022 Jun;56(3):237-243. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2055137. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
6
A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.一种利用计算机断层扫描参数预测不同部位输尿管结石碎石术成功的新模型。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Mar;46(2):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.01.011. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
7
Ureteral wall thickness is an independent parameter affecting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment in ureteral stones above the iliac crest.输尿管壁厚度是影响髂嵴以上输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石治疗成功的独立参数。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Jul;75(7):e14264. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14264. Epub 2021 May 4.
8
Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients.影响成人患者体外冲击波碎石术治疗大于 1cm 的近端输尿管结石成功率的因素。
Urolithiasis. 2021 Feb;49(1):51-56. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01186-7. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
9
Ureteral wall volume at ureteral stone site is a critical predictor for shock wave lithotripsy outcomes: comparison with ureteral wall thickness and area.输尿管结石部位的输尿管壁体积是冲击波碎石术结果的关键预测指标:与输尿管壁厚度和面积的比较。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Aug;48(4):361-368. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01154-w. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
10
Formula for predicting the impaction of ureteral stones.预测输尿管结石嵌顿的公式。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Aug;48(4):353-360. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01152-y. Epub 2019 Aug 5.