• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同伴提供的服务在中低收入国家的物质使用:系统评价。

Peer-delivered services for substance use in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.

机构信息

Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Sep;95:103252. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103252. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103252
PMID:33892281
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Addressing the burden of disease associated with substance use is a global priority, yet access to treatment is limited, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Peers, individuals with lived experience of substance use, may play an important role in expanding access to treatment, supporting outcomes, and reducing stigma. While peer-delivered services for substance use have been scaling up in high-income countries (HICs), less is known about their application in LMICs. This systematic review synthesizes the evidence of peer-delivered services for substance use in LMICs.

METHODS

PsycINFO, Embase, Global Health, PubMed, and six region-specific databases were searched, and articles that described peer-delivered services for substance use and related outcomes in LMICs were included. Risk of bias was evaluated using tools appropriate for each study design. To provide a more stringent evaluation of structured interventions, a subset of articles was analyzed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) framework.

RESULTS

The search yielded 6540 articles. These were narrowed down to 34 included articles. Articles spanned four continents, included quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and primarily targeted infectious disease risk behaviors. Ten articles were included in the EPOC sub-analysis. In the context of high risk of bias, some of these articles demonstrated positive impacts of the peer-delivered services, including reductions in risk behaviors and increases in infectious disease knowledge scores, while many others showed no significant difference in outcomes between peer intervention and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Peer-delivered services may be feasible for addressing substance use and reducing infectious disease risk behaviors in LMICs, where there are severe human resource shortages. Globally, peers' lived experience is valuable for engaging patients in substance use treatment and harm reduction services. Further research is needed to better characterize and quantify outcomes for peer-delivered services for substance use in LMICs.

摘要

背景与目的

解决与物质使用相关的疾病负担是全球重点,但治疗的可及性有限,特别是在中低收入国家(LMICs)。同伴,即有物质使用经验的个人,可能在扩大治疗机会、支持治疗结果和减少污名化方面发挥重要作用。虽然同伴提供的物质使用服务在高收入国家(HICs)中已经在扩大规模,但在 LMICs 中,关于其应用的信息却知之甚少。本系统评价综合了 LMICs 中同伴提供的物质使用服务的证据。

方法

检索了 PsycINFO、Embase、全球健康、PubMed 和六个地区特定数据库,并纳入了描述 LMICs 中同伴提供的物质使用服务及其相关结果的文章。使用适合每种研究设计的工具评估偏倚风险。为了更严格地评估结构化干预措施,对一部分文章使用了 Cochrane 有效实践和组织关怀(EPOC)框架进行分析。

结果

搜索共产生了 6540 篇文章。经过筛选,最终纳入了 34 篇文章。这些文章涵盖了四大洲,包括定量和定性方法,主要针对传染病风险行为。其中 10 篇文章被纳入 EPOC 子分析。在高偏倚风险的背景下,其中一些文章显示出同伴提供的服务具有积极影响,包括减少风险行为和提高传染病知识得分,而许多其他文章则显示同伴干预和对照组之间在结果上没有显著差异。

结论

在人力资源严重短缺的 LMICs 中,同伴提供的服务可能是解决物质使用和减少传染病风险行为的可行方法。在全球范围内,同伴的生活经验对于吸引患者参与物质使用治疗和减少伤害服务非常有价值。需要进一步研究以更好地描述和量化 LMICs 中同伴提供的物质使用服务的结果。

相似文献

1
Peer-delivered services for substance use in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.同伴提供的服务在中低收入国家的物质使用:系统评价。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Sep;95:103252. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103252. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.无条件现金转移以减少贫困和脆弱性:对中低收入国家卫生服务利用和健康结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub3.
3
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.
4
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
5
Disclosure to social network members among abortion-seeking women in low- and middle-income countries with restrictive access: a systematic review.寻求堕胎的中低收入国家的妇女向社交网络成员披露信息:系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jun 7;18(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01165-0.
6
Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.支持健康足月婴儿的母乳喂养母亲。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 25;10(10):CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub6.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
9
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
10
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation Factors Influencing Peer-Delivered Behavioral Evidence-Based Interventions for Substance Use Disorders: A Scoping Review.影响同伴提供的物质使用障碍行为循证干预措施实施的因素:一项范围综述
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01470-x.
2
Substance Checking Outreach and PrEP Engagement (SCOPE) Study: protocol for a non-randomised clinical trial .物质检查外展与暴露前预防参与(SCOPE)研究:一项非随机临床试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e101380. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101380.
3
The feasibility of respondent-driven sampling with people who use drugs in rural Western Cape, South Africa: A qualitative study.
在南非西开普省农村地区对吸毒者进行应答驱动抽样的可行性:一项定性研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 26;5(6):e0004065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004065. eCollection 2025.
4
Disparities Experienced by Racial Minorities Contribute to Treatment Gaps and Lack of Access to Resources and Supports for Substance Use Disorders.少数族裔所经历的差异导致了治疗差距以及在物质使用障碍方面缺乏资源获取和支持。
Innov Aging. 2025 Mar 12;9(6):igaf030. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaf030. eCollection 2025.
5
Mutual-Support Groups for Alcohol and Other Drug Use in East, South and Southeast Asia: A Scoping Review.东亚、南亚和东南亚地区酒精及其他药物使用互助小组:一项范围综述
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2025 Sep;44(6):1711-1755. doi: 10.1111/dar.14094. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
6
"You are helping from the heart not just from the head": a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences of peer workers working with people experiencing homelessness and substance use.“你是出于真心而非仅仅出于理智提供帮助”:对与无家可归及有药物使用问题者共事的同伴工作者经历的系统评价与质性证据综合分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 9;25(1):1714. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23006-6.
7
Workforce outcomes among substance use peer supports and their contextual determinants: A scoping review protocol.物质使用同伴支持中的劳动力成果及其背景决定因素:一项范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 9;19(12):e0311821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311821. eCollection 2024.
8
Adapting a Behavioral Activation Intervention for Opioid Use Disorder and Methadone Treatment Retention for Peer Delivery in a Low-Resource Setting: A Case Series.在资源匮乏环境中调整行为激活干预措施用于阿片类物质使用障碍及美沙酮治疗维持以实现同伴传递:病例系列
Cogn Behav Pract. 2024 Nov;31(4):437-450. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
9
Key Considerations in Integrating a Peer Support Model Within Psychiatric Emergency Services at a Canadian Pediatric Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.在加拿大一家儿科急诊科的精神科急诊服务中整合同伴支持模式的关键考量因素:一项定性研究
Community Ment Health J. 2025 Apr;61(3):576-586. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01365-5. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
10
Patient and public involvement in healthcare: a systematic mapping review of systematic reviews - identification of current research and possible directions for future research.患者和公众参与医疗保健:系统评价的系统综述-当前研究的识别和未来研究的可能方向。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 19;14(9):e083215. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083215.