• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物质使用同伴支持中的劳动力成果及其背景决定因素:一项范围综述方案。

Workforce outcomes among substance use peer supports and their contextual determinants: A scoping review protocol.

作者信息

Bell Justin S, Griffin Tina, Castedo de Martell Sierra, Kay Emma Sophia, Hawk Mary, Hudson Michelle, Ray Bradley, Watson Dennis P

机构信息

Lighthouse Institute, Chestnut Health Systems, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

University Library, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 9;19(12):e0311821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311821. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0311821
PMID:39652610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11627360/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Peer recovery support services are a promising approach for improving harm reduction, treatment, and recovery-related outcomes for people who have substance use disorders. However, unique difficulties associated with the role may place peer recovery support staff [i.e., peers] at high risk for negative workforce outcomes, including burnout, vicarious trauma, and compassion fatigue.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review protocol aims to describe a proposed effort to review the nature and extent of research evidence on peer workforce outcomes and how these outcomes might differ across service settings. Results of the review described in this protocol will help to answer the following research questions: 1) What is known about workforce-related outcomes for peers working in the substance use field?; 2) What is known about how the structure of work impacts these outcomes?; and 3) How do these outcomes differ by service setting type?

METHODS

A scoping review will be conducted with literature searches conducted in PsycINFO®, [EBSCO],Embase® [EBSCO], CINAHL® [EBSCO], Web of Science™ [Clarivate], and Google Scholar databases for relevant articles discussing US-based research and published in English from 1 January 1999 to 1 August 2023. The proposed review will include peer-reviewed and grey-literature published materials describing the experiences of peers participating in recovery support services and harm reduction efforts across a variety of service settings. Two evaluators will independently review the abstracts and full-text articles. We will perform a narrative synthesis, summarizing and comparing the results across service settings.

EXPECTED OUTPUTS

Publishing this protocol will help accelerate the identification of critical workforce issues, and bolster the transparency and reporting of the final review. The proposed review will assess the state of the literature on peer workforce-related outcomes and how outcomes might vary by service setting context. Results of the proposed review will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Findings will inform the field regarding future directions to support the emerging peer workforce.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Systematic review registration Submitted to Open Science Framework, August 22nd, 2023.

摘要

引言

同伴康复支持服务是一种很有前景的方法,可改善物质使用障碍患者的减少伤害、治疗及康复相关结果。然而,该角色所涉及的独特困难可能使同伴康复支持人员(即同伴)面临负面劳动力结果的高风险,包括职业倦怠、替代性创伤和同情疲劳。

目的

本范围综述方案旨在描述一项拟议的工作,即回顾关于同伴劳动力结果的研究证据的性质和范围,以及这些结果在不同服务环境中可能如何不同。本方案中描述的综述结果将有助于回答以下研究问题:1)对于在物质使用领域工作的同伴,已知哪些与劳动力相关的结果?;2)已知工作结构如何影响这些结果?;3)这些结果在不同服务环境类型中有何不同?

方法

将进行一项范围综述,在PsycINFO®、[EBSCO]、Embase® [EBSCO]、CINAHL® [EBSCO]、Web of Science™ [科睿唯安]和谷歌学术数据库中进行文献检索,查找1999年1月1日至2023年8月1日期间讨论美国研究且以英文发表的相关文章。拟议的综述将包括同行评审和灰色文献发表材料,这些材料描述了同伴在各种服务环境中参与康复支持服务和减少伤害工作的经历。两名评估人员将独立评审摘要和全文文章。我们将进行叙述性综合,总结并比较不同服务环境的结果。

预期产出

发布本方案将有助于加速识别关键的劳动力问题,并提高最终综述的透明度和报告质量。拟议的综述将评估关于同伴劳动力相关结果的文献现状,以及结果可能如何因服务环境背景而异。拟议综述的结果将在同行评审出版物和会议报告中传播。研究结果将为该领域提供有关支持新兴同伴劳动力的未来方向的信息。

试验注册

系统综述注册 于2023年8月22日提交至开放科学框架。

相似文献

1
Workforce outcomes among substance use peer supports and their contextual determinants: A scoping review protocol.物质使用同伴支持中的劳动力成果及其背景决定因素:一项范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 9;19(12):e0311821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311821. eCollection 2024.
2
Workforce outcomes among substance use peer supports and their contextual determinants: A scoping review protocol.物质使用同伴支持的劳动力成果及其背景决定因素:一项范围审查方案。
Res Sq. 2024 Jan 18:rs.3.rs-3308002. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3308002/v1.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Workforce outcomes among substance use peer supports: a scoping review of individual and organizational influences.物质使用同伴支持中的劳动力成果:对个人和组织影响的范围审查
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 11;12:1515264. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1515264. eCollection 2024.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
7
Influence of social media and the digital environment on international migration of health workforce from low- and middle-income countries post COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review protocol.社交媒体和数字环境对 COVID-19 大流行后低中等收入国家卫生人力国际迁移的影响:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 17;14(10):e087213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087213.
8
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
9
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.
10
Development and implementation determinants of competency frameworks for mental health clinicians and service providers working with youth: a scoping review protocol.精神健康临床医生和服务提供者与青年合作的能力框架的制定和实施决定因素:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 28;14(8):e087437. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087437.

引用本文的文献

1
Workforce outcomes among substance use peer supports: a scoping review of individual and organizational influences.物质使用同伴支持中的劳动力成果:对个人和组织影响的范围审查
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 11;12:1515264. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1515264. eCollection 2024.
2
Advancing peer support workforce research: Insights and recommendations through the lens of professionalization.推进同伴支持工作队伍研究:基于专业化视角的见解与建议
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Mar;170:209612. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209612. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Enhancing Role Integrity for Peer Workers.增强同行工作者的角色完整性。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Jan;60(1):124-130. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01156-4. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
2
"The new normal has become a nonstop crisis": a qualitative study of burnout among Philadelphia's harm reduction and substance use disorder treatment workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.“新常态已成为一场持续不断的危机”:一项定性研究,探讨了 COVID-19 大流行期间费城减少伤害和物质使用障碍治疗工作者的倦怠情况。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Mar 11;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00752-7.
3
Peer Recovery Coaches Perceptions of Their Work and Their Implications for Training, Support and Personal Recovery.同伴康复教练对其工作的看法及其对培训、支持和个人康复的影响。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Jul;59(5):962-971. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01080-z. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
4
Estimating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rising trends in drug overdose mortality in the United States, 2018-2021.估算 2018-2021 年美国药物过量死亡率上升趋势中 COVID-19 大流行的影响。
Ann Epidemiol. 2023 Jan;77:85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.11.007. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
5
Systematic and scoping reviews: A comparison and overview.系统评价和范围综述:比较与概述。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2022 Dec;35(4):464-469. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
6
Peer Workers in Co-production and Co-creation in Mental Health and Substance Use Services: A Scoping Review.同伴工作人员在精神健康和物质使用服务中的共同生产和共同创造:范围综述。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 Mar;50(2):296-316. doi: 10.1007/s10488-022-01242-x. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
7
Steps for Conducting a Scoping Review.进行范围综述的步骤。
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Oct;14(5):565-567. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00621.1.
8
Burnout: A Review of Theory and Measurement. burnout: 理论与测量综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 4;19(3):1780. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031780.
9
A Narrative Review of Factors Influencing Peer Support Role Implementation in Mental Health Systems: Implications for Research, Policy and Practice.影响心理健康系统中同伴支持角色实施的因素述评:对研究、政策和实践的启示。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Jul;49(4):596-612. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01186-8. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
10
From Arksey and O'Malley and Beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology.从阿克西和奥马利方法及其他方法:定制化以增强基于团队的混合式范围综述方法。
MethodsX. 2021 May 7;8:101375. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101375. eCollection 2021.