University of Glasgow, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK.
University of Arkansas, Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Fayetteville, AR, USA; Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Addict Behav. 2021 Aug;119:106932. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106932. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
Comparing people's momentary and retrospective reports of substance use and sexual activity can illuminate discrepant recall biases across these behaviors. Extant research suggests that people tend to underreport alcohol use on retrospective surveys and overreport sexual activity. We provided an updated account of these biases, extending previous work by looking at alcohol- and cannabis-involved sexual activity as well as potential gender differences in recall biases.
Using a sample of adults (n = 110; 58.2% women), we administered surveys three times a day for 28 days to measure momentary alcohol and cannabis use, sexual activity, and substance-involved sexual activity. At the end of this momentary assessment, participants completed a retrospective survey assessing how frequently they engaged in these behaviors during the 28-day period.
We compared participants' momentary reports-which were scaled to account for compliance rates-and retrospective surveys. While there were no significant differences in momentary and retrospective reports of alcohol or cannabis use, participants reported higher rates of sexual activity and alcohol-involved sexual activity on the retrospective surveys than the momentary reports. Effect sizes for significant differences were medium to large (Cohen's d: 0.26-0.67).
Alcohol- and cannabis-involved sexual activity tend to be overreported on retrospective surveys, and preliminary findings suggest that these recall biases may vary by gender. Researchers interested in the co-occurrence of substance use and sexual activity should be aware of this potential random error and consider how to reduce recall biases based on method of data collection.
比较人们对物质使用和性行为的即时和回顾性报告,可以阐明这些行为之间存在差异的回忆偏差。现有研究表明,人们在回顾性调查中往往会低估酒精使用量,而高估性行为。我们提供了这些偏差的最新描述,通过研究酒精和大麻相关的性行为以及回忆偏差中的潜在性别差异,扩展了之前的工作。
使用成年人样本(n=110;58.2%为女性),我们在 28 天内每天进行三次调查,以衡量即时的酒精和大麻使用、性行为以及物质相关的性行为。在这次即时评估结束时,参与者完成了一项回顾性调查,评估他们在 28 天内这些行为的发生频率。
我们比较了参与者的即时报告——这些报告已经过调整以考虑合规率——和回顾性调查。虽然在酒精或大麻使用的即时和回顾性报告中没有显著差异,但参与者在回顾性调查中报告的性行为和酒精相关的性行为频率高于即时报告。显著差异的效应大小为中等至较大(Cohen's d:0.26-0.67)。
酒精和大麻相关的性行为在回顾性调查中往往被高估,初步发现表明这些回忆偏差可能因性别而异。对物质使用和性行为共现感兴趣的研究人员应该意识到这种潜在的随机误差,并考虑如何根据数据收集方法减少回忆偏差。