• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中小儿边缘性粮食不安全筛查。

Screening for marginal food security in young children in primary care.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot St., P.O. Bag 8888, Kingston, ON, K7L5E9, Canada.

Centre for Studies in Primary Care, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2021 Apr 23;21(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02674-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-021-02674-4
PMID:33892660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8063438/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Household food insecurity (FI), even at marginal levels, is associated with poor child health outcomes. The Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (NutriSTEP®) is a valid and reliable 17-item parent-completed measure of nutrition risk and includes a single item addressing FI which may be a useful child-specific screening tool. We evaluated the diagnostic test properties of the single NutriSTEP® FI question using the 2-item Hunger Vital Sign™ as the criterion measure in a primary care population of healthy children ages 18 months to 5 years.

RESULTS

The sample included 1174 families, 53 (4.5%) of which were marginally food secure. An affirmative response to the single NutriSTEP® question "I have difficulty buying food I want to feed my child because food is expensive" had a sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 91% and demonstrated good construct validity when compared with the Hunger Vital Sign™.

CONCLUSION

The single NutriSTEP® question may be an effective screening tool in clinical practice to identify marginal food security in families with young children and to link families with community-based services or financial assistance programs including tax benefits.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

TARGet Kids! practice-based research network (Registered June 5, 2013 at www.clinicaltrials.gov ; NCT01869530); www.targetkids.ca.

摘要

背景

即使处于边缘水平,家庭食物不安全也与儿童健康状况不佳有关。幼儿营养筛查工具(NutriSTEP®)是一种有效的、可靠的 17 项家长完成的营养风险测量工具,其中包含一个针对家庭食物不安全的单一项目,这可能是一种有用的儿童特定筛查工具。我们使用 2 项饥饿生命体征作为标准测量方法,评估了单个 NutriSTEP®家庭食物不安全问题的诊断测试特性,研究对象是年龄在 18 个月至 5 岁之间的健康儿童的初级保健人群。

结果

该样本包括 1174 个家庭,其中 53 个(4.5%)家庭处于边缘食物安全状态。对单个 NutriSTEP®问题“我很难购买我想给孩子吃的食物,因为食物太贵了”的肯定回答具有 85%的敏感性和 91%的特异性,与饥饿生命体征相比具有良好的结构有效性。

结论

单个 NutriSTEP®问题可能是临床实践中识别有年幼子女的家庭处于边缘食物安全状态的有效筛查工具,并将家庭与社区服务或财务援助计划(包括税收优惠)联系起来。

试验注册

TARGet Kids! 基于实践的研究网络(2013 年 6 月 5 日在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 注册;NCT01869530);www.targetkids.ca。

相似文献

1
Screening for marginal food security in young children in primary care.基层医疗中小儿边缘性粮食不安全筛查。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Apr 23;21(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02674-4.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (NutriSTEP®) in Iranian Preschool Children.《学前儿童营养筛查工具(NutriSTEP®)波斯语版本在伊朗学龄前儿童中的有效性和可靠性》
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 May-Jun;52:e90-e95. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
3
The sDOR.2-6y™ Is a Valid Measure of Nutrition Risk Independent of BMI-for-Age z-Score and Household Food Security Status in Preschool Aged-Children.sDOR.2-6y™ 是一种独立于 BMI 年龄 z 评分和家庭食物保障状况的营养风险有效测量方法,适用于学龄前儿童。
Nutrients. 2024 Mar 7;16(6):767. doi: 10.3390/nu16060767.
4
Development and validity of a 2-item screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity.开发并验证一种两项目的筛查工具,以识别存在食物不安全风险的家庭。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e26-32. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3146.
5
Development, reliability, and validity testing of Toddler NutriSTEP: a nutrition risk screening questionnaire for children 18-35 months of age.幼儿营养筛查工具(Toddler NutriSTEP)的开发、信度和效度测试:一份针对18至35个月儿童的营养风险筛查问卷
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Sep;40(9):877-86. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0048. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
6
Measuring the Effects of a Demonstration to Reduce Childhood Food Insecurity: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Nevada Healthy, Hunger Free Kids Project.衡量减少儿童食物不安全示范活动的效果:内华达州健康无饥饿儿童项目的随机对照试验。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Jan;121(1S):S22-S33. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.03.002.
7
Benefits of using both the Hunger Vital Sign and brief nutrition security screener in health-related social needs screening.使用饥饿生命体征和简短营养安全筛查器进行与健康相关的社会需求筛查的益处。
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jul 27;14(8):445-451. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae037.
8
Maternal Preconception Body Mass Index and Early Childhood Nutritional Risk.母亲孕前体质量指数与儿童早期营养风险。
J Nutr. 2023 Aug;153(8):2421-2431. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.06.022. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
9
Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (NutriSTEP): validation and test-retest reliability of a parent-administered questionnaire assessing nutrition risk of preschoolers.适用于每名学龄前儿童的营养筛查工具(NutriSTEP):一份由家长填写的评估学龄前儿童营养风险问卷的效度及重测信度
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jun;62(6):770-80. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602780. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
School food programs and food insecurity at the REACH school network: an observational study.REACH学校网络中的学校食品计划与粮食不安全状况:一项观察性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):2060. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23163-8.
2
Food Insecurity Screening in High-Income Countries, Tool Validity, and Implementation: A Scoping Review.高收入国家的粮食不安全筛查、工具有效性和实施情况:范围综述。
Nutrients. 2024 May 29;16(11):1684. doi: 10.3390/nu16111684.
3
Consensus from an expert panel on how to identify and support food insecurity during pregnancy: A modified Delphi study.专家小组就如何在怀孕期间识别和支持粮食不安全问题达成的共识:一项改良德尔菲研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 5;22(1):1231. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08587-x.
4
Childhood food insufficiency and adulthood cardiometabolic health conditions among a population-based sample of older adults in Puerto Rico.波多黎各老年人群体样本中的儿童期食物匮乏与成年期心脏代谢健康状况
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Mar 12;17:101066. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101066. eCollection 2022 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Prioritizing Nutrition Security in the US.优先保障美国的营养安全。
JAMA. 2021 Apr 27;325(16):1605-1606. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1915.
2
Considering Approaches to Screening for Social Determinants of Health.考虑健康社会决定因素的筛查方法。
Pediatrics. 2019 Oct;144(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2395.
3
Food Insecurity Screening in Pediatric Clinical Settings: A Caregivers' Perspective.儿科临床环境中的食物不安全筛查:照顾者的视角。
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Jan;24(1):101-109. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02785-6.
4
Association of Food Insecurity with Children's Behavioral, Emotional, and Academic Outcomes: A Systematic Review.粮食不安全与儿童行为、情绪和学业成果的关联:一项系统综述
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017 Feb/Mar;38(2):135-150. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000383.
5
Moving From Social Risk Assessment and Identification to Intervention and Treatment.从社会风险评估与识别转向干预与治疗。
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Mar;16(2):97-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
6
Promoting Food Security for All Children.促进所有儿童的粮食安全。
Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136(5):e1431-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3301.
7
Development, reliability, and validity testing of Toddler NutriSTEP: a nutrition risk screening questionnaire for children 18-35 months of age.幼儿营养筛查工具(Toddler NutriSTEP)的开发、信度和效度测试:一份针对18至35个月儿童的营养风险筛查问卷
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Sep;40(9):877-86. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0048. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
8
Cohort Profile: The Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGet Kids!).队列简介:儿童应用研究小组(目标儿童!)
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):776-88. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu123. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
9
Validity of a single item food security questionnaire in Arctic Canada.加拿大北极地区单项食品保障问卷的有效性。
Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):e1616-23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3663.
10
Are food insecurity's health impacts underestimated in the U.S. population? Marginal food security also predicts adverse health outcomes in young U.S. children and mothers.食物不安全对美国人群健康的影响是否被低估了?边缘型食物不安全状况也预示着美国年轻儿童及其母亲的不良健康后果。
Adv Nutr. 2013 Jan 1;4(1):51-61. doi: 10.3945/an.112.003228.