Suppr超能文献

主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的预测:多种非侵入性参数的准确性

Prediction of severity of aortic stenosis: accuracy of multiple noninvasive parameters.

作者信息

Come P C, Riley M F, Ferguson J F, Morgan J P, McKay R G

机构信息

Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02215.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1988 Jul;85(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90499-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

As newer non-medical techniques are developed to treat older patients with severe aortic stenosis, reliable noninvasive diagnosis of the condition will become increasingly important. For this reason, the accuracy of multiple noninvasive indexes for quantitation of the severity of aortic stenosis was evaluated, relative to catheterization-determined aortic valve area.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

To evaluate the accuracy of multiple noninvasive parameters in assessing the presence and extent of aortic valve narrowing, noninvasive and catheterization correlations of the severity of aortic stenosis were obtained on 121 occasions in 81 patients (mean age, 76 +/- 11 years). Forty patients had studies performed before and after valvuloplasty. Noninvasive studies included the time to one-half carotid upstroke and carotid ejection time, corrected for heart rate, measured from a carotid pulse tracing; M-mode echocardiographic aortic valve excursion; mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve assessed by Doppler technique; the ratio of the peak to mean pressure gradient by Doppler; and Doppler aortic valve area assessed using the following continuity equation: aortic valve area = A X V/V1, where A = left ventricular outflow tract area, V = peak left ventricular outflow tract velocity, and V1 = peak velocity in the aortic stenotic jet. Mean aortic valve gradients and area (calculated using the Gorlin formula) were also assessed at cardiac catheterization.

RESULTS

The correlations between the catheterization measurement of aortic valve area and the various noninvasive measurements were as follows: time to one-half carotid upstroke (r = -0.32, p less than 0.001); corrected left ventricular ejection time (r = -0.24, p less than 0.05); aortic valve excursion (r = 0.51, p less than 0.001); mean gradient by Doppler study (r = -0.44, p less than 0.001); mean gradient by catheterization analysis (r = -0.55, p less than 0.001); peak to mean gradient ratio measured by continuous wave Doppler (r = 0.38, p less than 0.001); and aortic valve area assessed using the Doppler continuity equation (r = 0.85, p less than 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive determination of aortic valve area using the continuity equation is an accurate means of assessing the severity of aortic stenosis. Although multiple other noninvasive parameters also correlate with aortic valve area measured at catheterization, there is too much scatter of data points to permit accurate prediction of catheterization aortic valve area in any given patient.

摘要

目的

随着用于治疗老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的更新的非医学技术的发展,对该疾病进行可靠的无创诊断将变得越来越重要。因此,相对于导管检查确定的主动脉瓣面积,评估了多种无创指标定量主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的准确性。

患者和方法

为评估多种无创参数在评估主动脉瓣狭窄的存在和程度方面的准确性,在81例患者(平均年龄76±11岁)中进行了121次无创和导管检查相关性研究,以确定主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度。40例患者在瓣膜成形术前和术后进行了检查。无创检查包括从颈动脉搏动描记图测量的、经心率校正的到颈动脉上升支一半的时间和颈动脉射血时间;M型超声心动图测量的主动脉瓣活动幅度;用多普勒技术评估的主动脉瓣平均压力阶差;连续波多普勒测量的峰值与平均压力阶差之比;以及使用以下连续性方程评估的多普勒主动脉瓣面积:主动脉瓣面积 = A×V/V1,其中A = 左心室流出道面积,V = 左心室流出道峰值速度,V1 = 主动脉狭窄射流峰值速度。在心脏导管检查时还评估了平均主动脉瓣压力阶差和面积(使用Gorlin公式计算)。

结果

导管检查测量的主动脉瓣面积与各种无创测量之间的相关性如下:到颈动脉上升支一半的时间(r = -0.32,p < 0.001);校正后的左心室射血时间(r = -0.24,p < 0.05);主动脉瓣活动幅度(r = 0.51,p < 0.001);多普勒研究测得的平均压力阶差(r = -0.44,p < 0.001);导管检查分析测得的平均压力阶差(r = -0.55,p < 0.001);连续波多普勒测量的峰值与平均压力阶差之比(r = 0.38,p < 0.001);以及使用多普勒连续性方程评估的主动脉瓣面积(r = 0.85,p < 0.001)。

结论

使用连续性方程无创测定主动脉瓣面积是评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的准确方法。尽管其他多种无创参数也与导管检查测量的主动脉瓣面积相关,但数据点的离散度太大,无法在任何给定患者中准确预测导管检查的主动脉瓣面积。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验