• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

野生彩虹鱼的肠道内容物微生物组在实验室驯化过程中发生改变。

The gut content microbiome of wild-caught rainbow darter is altered during laboratory acclimation.

机构信息

Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; School of Earth, Environment and Society, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics. 2021 Sep;39:100835. doi: 10.1016/j.cbd.2021.100835. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.cbd.2021.100835
PMID:33894530
Abstract

An increasing number of laboratory studies are showing that environmental stressors and diet affect the fish gut microbiome. However, the application of these results to wild populations is uncertain as little is known about how the gut microbiome shifts when fish are transitioned from the field to the laboratory. To assess this, intestinal contents (i.e. digesta) of wild-caught rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum) were sampled in the field and in the lab after 14- and 42-days acclimation. In addition, from days 15-42 some fish were exposed to waterborne triclosan, an antimicrobial found in aquatic ecosystems, or to dilutions of municipal wastewater effluents, to determine how these stressors affect the bacterial communities of gut contents. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was used to determine microbial community composition, alpha, and beta diversity present in the fish gut contents. In total, there was 8,074,658 reads and 11,853 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) identified. The gut contents of wild fish were dominant in both Proteobacteria (35%) and Firmicutes (27%), while lab fish were dominant in Firmicutes (37-47%) and had lower alpha diversity. Wild fish had greater ASVs per sample (423-1304) compared to lab fish (19-685). Similarly, the beta-diversity of these bacterial communities differed between field and lab control fish; control fish were distinct from the 10% wastewater effluent and 100 ng/L TCS treatment groups. Results indicate that the gut microbiome of wild fish changes with the transition to laboratory environments; hence, prolonged acclimation to new settings may be required to achieve a stable gut content microbiome in wild-caught fish. Research is required to understand the length of time required to reach a stable fish gut microbiome.

摘要

越来越多的实验室研究表明,环境压力和饮食会影响鱼类肠道微生物组。然而,由于人们对鱼类从野外过渡到实验室时肠道微生物组如何变化知之甚少,因此这些结果在野外种群中的应用尚不确定。为了评估这一点,从野外和实验室中采集了野生彩虹鮈(Etheostoma caeruleum)的肠道内容物(即消化物),并在适应 14 天和 42 天后进行了采样。此外,在第 15 天至第 42 天期间,一些鱼暴露于水传播的三氯生(一种存在于水生生态系统中的抗菌剂)或城市废水的稀释物中,以确定这些压力源如何影响肠道内容物中的细菌群落。16S rRNA 基因扩增子测序用于确定鱼类肠道内容物中存在的微生物群落组成、alpha 和 beta 多样性。总共鉴定出 8074658 条reads 和 11853 个扩增子序列变体(ASV)。野生鱼类的肠道内容物主要由变形菌门(35%)和厚壁菌门(27%)组成,而实验室鱼类则主要由厚壁菌门(37-47%)组成,alpha 多样性较低。野生鱼类的每个样本中的 ASV 数量(423-1304)多于实验室鱼类(19-685)。同样,这些细菌群落的 beta 多样性在野外和实验室对照鱼类之间也存在差异;对照鱼类与 10%废水和 100ng/L TCS 处理组明显不同。结果表明,野生鱼类的肠道微生物组随着向实验室环境的过渡而发生变化;因此,可能需要对新环境进行长时间的适应,才能使野生鱼类的肠道内容物微生物组达到稳定状态。需要研究了解达到稳定鱼类肠道微生物组所需的时间长度。

相似文献

1
The gut content microbiome of wild-caught rainbow darter is altered during laboratory acclimation.野生彩虹鱼的肠道内容物微生物组在实验室驯化过程中发生改变。
Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics. 2021 Sep;39:100835. doi: 10.1016/j.cbd.2021.100835. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum) from a river impacted by municipal wastewater effluents have altered gut content microbiomes.受市政废水影响的虹彩镖鲈(Etheostoma caeruleum)的肠道内容物微生物组发生了改变。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jan 10;751:141724. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141724. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
Intestinal microbial profiles of wild Alaskan rainbow trout () characterized by 16S rRNA amplicon data.通过16S rRNA扩增子数据表征的阿拉斯加野生虹鳟肠道微生物图谱。
Data Brief. 2024 Sep 5;57:110902. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110902. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Perturbation and restoration of the fathead minnow gut microbiome after low-level triclosan exposure.低水平三氯生暴露后胖头鱼肠道微生物组的扰动和恢复。
Microbiome. 2015 Mar 3;3:6. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0069-6. eCollection 2015.
5
Interpopulation Variation in the Atlantic Salmon Microbiome Reflects Environmental and Genetic Diversity.大西洋鲑鱼微生物组的种群间变异反映了环境和遗传多样性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Aug 1;84(16). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00691-18. Print 2018 Aug 15.
6
Structure and membership of gut microbial communities in multiple fish cryptic species under potential migratory effects.潜在洄游影响下多种鱼类隐存种肠道微生物群落的结构和组成。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 5;10(1):7547. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64570-8.
7
Molecular signatures in rainbow darter (Etheostoma caeruleum) inhabiting an urbanized river reach receiving wastewater effluents.栖息在接纳废水污水的城市化河流段的彩虹鮈(Etheostoma caeruleum)中的分子特征。
Aquat Toxicol. 2014 Mar;148:211-20. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
8
Ecological and Ontogenetic Components of Larval Lake Sturgeon Gut Microbiota Assembly, Successional Dynamics, and Ecological Evaluation of Neutral Community Processes.幼体湖鲟肠道微生物组组装的生态和个体发生成分、演替动态以及中性群落过程的生态评估。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 May 5;86(10). doi: 10.1128/AEM.02662-19.
9
The Core Gut Microbiome of the American Cockroach, Periplaneta americana, Is Stable and Resilient to Dietary Shifts.美国蟑螂(美洲大蠊)的核心肠道微生物群稳定且对饮食变化具有抗性。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Oct 27;82(22):6603-6610. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01837-16. Print 2016 Nov 15.
10
Phylogenetic and functional characterization of the distal intestinal microbiome of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from both farm and aquarium settings.来自养殖场和水族箱环境的虹鳟鱼(Oncorhynchus mykiss)远端肠道微生物群的系统发育和功能特征
J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Feb;122(2):347-363. doi: 10.1111/jam.13347. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Interplay between antipredator behavior, parasitism, and gut microbiome in wild stickleback populations.野生棘鱼种群中反捕食行为、寄生现象与肠道微生物群之间的相互作用。
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2025 Jul 19;11(1):138. doi: 10.1038/s41522-025-00758-y.
2
Differences and correlation analysis of feeding habits and intestinal microbiome in and in the upper reaches of Yangtze River.长江上游[具体对象1]和[具体对象2]的食性与肠道微生物群落差异及相关性分析
Front Microbiol. 2025 Mar 11;16:1513401. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1513401. eCollection 2025.
3
Environmental and population influences on mummichog () gut microbiomes.
环境和种群对食蚊鱼肠道微生物群的影响。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Mar 4;13(3):e0094724. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00947-24. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
4
Comparative Analysis of Intestinal Microbiota in Wild, Domesticated, and Cultured .野生、驯化和养殖环境下肠道微生物群的比较分析
Biology (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;13(12):983. doi: 10.3390/biology13120983.
5
Introduction into natural environments shifts the gut microbiome of captivity-raised filter-feeding bivalves.引入自然环境会改变圈养滤食性双壳贝类的肠道微生物群。
ISME Commun. 2024 Oct 23;4(1):ycae125. doi: 10.1093/ismeco/ycae125. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Conceptualizing the Role of the Microbiome as a Mediator and Modifier in Environmental Health Studies: A Scoping Review of Studies of Triclosan and the Microbiome.将微生物群视为环境健康研究中的介质和调节剂的概念化:三氯生与微生物群研究的范围综述
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2024 Mar;11(1):30-38. doi: 10.1007/s40572-024-00428-9. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
7
Gut microbiota differences between paired intestinal wall and digesta samples in three small species of fish.三种小型鱼类肠道壁和食糜样本中的肠道微生物组差异。
PeerJ. 2022 Feb 22;10:e12992. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12992. eCollection 2022.
8
Red Cusk-Eel () Gut Microbiota Description of Wild and Aquaculture Specimens.红鼬鳚()野生和养殖样本的肠道微生物群描述 。 (注:原文括号处内容不完整,可能影响准确理解)
Microorganisms. 2022 Jan 4;10(1):105. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10010105.