Suppr超能文献

一种关系方法来评估食物环境,发现对于那些使用它的人来说,接近的食物环境很重要。

A relational approach to evaluate food environments finds that the proximate food environment matters for those who use it.

机构信息

The Ohio State University, USA.

The Ohio State University, USA.

出版信息

Health Place. 2021 May;69:102564. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102564. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

Abstract

Using a relational approach, this study investigates whether shopping close to home moderates the relationship between the proximate food environment and diet. To address this question, we develop the proximate food retail quality (PFRQ) score, an inverse-distance weighted measure of all food retailers within a resident's neighborhood that incorporates audit data of each food retailer. This study relies on data collected through 24-h dietary recalls and psychosocial surveys administered to 449 adults in two socioeconomically matched neighborhoods. Food retailer audits collected data on the availability, price, and quality of healthful foods. Seventy-one percent of study participants report conducting at least 50% of their food shopping within approximately one mile of their home. Household income and education are associated with likelihood to shop close to home, while access to a personal vehicle is not. Finally, results suggest that, for residents who shop primarily close to home, a one unit increase in proximate food retail environment score is associated with a 17.2-point increase in HEI-2010 score, a measure of overall diet quality that ranges from zero to 100. This study suggests that the food environment matters for those who use it and that a low-quality proximate food environment can amplify individual disadvantage.

摘要

本研究采用关系方法,调查了离家购物是否会缓和近食环境与饮食之间的关系。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了近食零售质量(PFRQ)评分,这是一种对居民所在社区内所有食杂店的反向距离加权衡量指标,纳入了每个食杂店的审计数据。本研究依赖于通过 24 小时膳食回忆和心理社会调查收集的数据,这些数据是在两个社会经济匹配的社区中对 449 名成年人进行的。食杂店审计收集了有关健康食品的可得性、价格和质量的数据。71%的研究参与者报告称,他们至少有 50%的食物是在离家约一英里的范围内购买的。家庭收入和教育与在家附近购物的可能性有关,而个人车辆的使用情况则没有。最后,结果表明,对于主要在家附近购物的居民,近食零售环境得分每增加一个单位,与 HEI-2010 得分的增加相关,后者是衡量整体饮食质量的指标,范围从 0 到 100。本研究表明,食环境对那些使用它的人很重要,低质量的近食环境会加剧个人劣势。

相似文献

9
Urban food environments and residents' shopping behaviors.城市食品环境与居民购物行为。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):606-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.021.
10
Food shopping behaviours and exposure to discrimination.食品购买行为与遭受歧视的情况。
Public Health Nutr. 2014 May;17(5):1167-76. doi: 10.1017/S136898001300075X. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Healthy diets and the retail food environment: A sociological approach.健康饮食与零售食品环境:一种社会学方法。
Health Place. 2020 Jan;61:102244. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102244. Epub 2019 Nov 17.
8
Impact on Dietary Choices After Discount Supermarket Opens in Low-Income Community.低收入社区开设折扣超市对饮食选择的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Jul-Aug;50(7):729-735. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验