• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[同意不稳定与辨别力的易变性]

[Erratic consent and lability of discernment].

作者信息

David Michel

机构信息

Fédération française de psychiatrie, 26 boulevard Brune, 75014 Paris, France.

出版信息

Soins Psychiatr. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(333):16-19. doi: 10.1016/j.spsy.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.spsy.2021.03.004
PMID:33894923
Abstract

Consent and discernment are two important notions, constantly present in the daily life of psychiatric caregivers. The Haute Autorité de santé sheds valuable light on discernment by defining it in terms of five characteristics. As for consent, it is based on the fundamental principle of an agreement given on a proposal with a perception of the stakes by the different parties. The consequences within the multidisciplinary team are multiple, between the information recorded in the shared medical record, the care decisions according to the clinic and the impact on the patients' group. These are all serious ethical and practical difficulties.

摘要

同意和辨别力是两个重要概念,在精神科护理人员的日常生活中经常出现。法国卫生总署通过从五个特征方面对辨别力进行定义,为其提供了有价值的阐释。至于同意,它基于一项基本原则,即就一项提议达成的协议,且各方都能认识到其中的利害关系。在多学科团队内部,其后果是多方面的,涉及共享病历中记录的信息、根据临床情况做出的护理决策以及对患者群体的影响。这些都是严重的伦理和实际难题。

相似文献

1
[Erratic consent and lability of discernment].[同意不稳定与辨别力的易变性]
Soins Psychiatr. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(333):16-19. doi: 10.1016/j.spsy.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[Consent or the breadcrumb trail of care].[同意或护理的线索]
Soins Psychiatr. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(333):20-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spsy.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
4
[Secrecy in the individual or shared care relationship].[个体或共享护理关系中的保密性]
Soins Psychiatr. 2019 Jan-Feb;40(320):10-13. doi: 10.1016/j.spsy.2018.11.002.
5
[A few reflective remarks on the notion of consent].[关于同意概念的几点思考]
Soins Psychiatr. 2021 Mar-Apr;42(333):12-15. doi: 10.1016/j.spsy.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
6
Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices.可穿戴设备用户感知的伦理问题
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Feb;24(1):1-28. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9872-8. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
7
[Awareness and understanding of consent in Alzheimer's disease].[对阿尔茨海默病中同意的认识与理解]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2015 Feb;171(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
8
Is respect for autonomy defensible?对自主性的尊重是否站得住脚?
J Med Ethics. 2007 Jun;33(6):353-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.018572.
9
Relational autonomy in informed consent (RAIC) as an ethics of care approach to the concept of informed consent.知情同意中的关系自主性(RAIC)作为一种对知情同意概念的关怀伦理方法。
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Mar;21(1):101-111. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9789-7.
10
[The application of technoscience to man: ethical discernment in relation to the transhumanist-posthumanist proposal].
Cuad Bioet. 2021 May-Aug;32(105):183-193. doi: 10.30444/CB.97.