Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam, 31441, Saudi Arabia.
College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O. Box 1982, Dammam, 31441, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):1394. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05183-9.
This study aimed to investigate the in vitro effect of a charcoal-containing dentifrice with different toothbrush stiffness on enamel.
Four main groups were applied: distilled water, conventional fluoridated toothpaste (Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint Toothpaste), charcoal toothpaste (Colgate Total Charcoal Toothpaste) and whitening toothpaste (Colgate Total Advanced Whitening Toothpaste). Three subgroups for each toothpaste were further included according to the toothbrush bristles' stiffness (soft, medium, and hard). Enamel specimens were subjected to 1,250 and 2,500 cycles of brushing using toothbrushing simulation machine. The average surface roughness change (ΔRa) in nanometer (nm) was measured to estimate the changes following the brushing simulation model. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests analyzed the data.
The type of toothpaste and the bristles' stiffness were determinant factors in increasing the ΔRa value (P = < 0.05). Generally, charcoal and whitening toothpastes with medium and hard bristles yielded higher ΔRa than fluoridated toothpaste and smooth bristles. Following 1,250 cycles of brushing simulation, charcoal toothpaste did not increase the enamel roughness compared to the controls. However, in prolonged brushing via 2,500 cycles of brushing simulation, using bristles with soft stiffness revealed that charcoal toothpaste was associated with increased surface roughness (55.86 ± 41.18 nm), which was statistically significant (P = 0.024) compared to the negative control. Using bristles with medium stiffness showed that the whitening (68.23 ± 48.58 nm) and charcoal (73.62 ± 34.66 nm) toothpastes significantly (P = < 0.05) increased the enamel roughness compared to the conventional toothpaste (36.53 ± 22.56 nm). There was no significant difference among the groups when brushes with hard bristles were used, as all the groups revealed increased enamel roughness.
The use of charcoal and whitening toothpastes increased enamel roughness, particularly with long-term use. The effect of bristle stiffness on enamel roughness was found to vary depending on the type of toothpaste used.
本研究旨在探讨含有活性炭的牙膏与不同牙刷硬度对牙釉质的体外影响。
应用了四个主要组别:蒸馏水、常规含氟牙膏(高露洁全效 12 清新薄荷牙膏)、活性炭牙膏(高露洁活性炭牙膏)和美白牙膏(高露洁全面美白牙膏)。每个牙膏进一步分为三组,根据牙刷刷毛的硬度(软、中、硬)。使用牙刷模拟机对牙釉质标本进行 1250 和 2500 次刷牙循环。用纳米(nm)平均表面粗糙度变化(ΔRa)来衡量模拟刷牙模型后的变化。采用双因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验进行数据分析。
牙膏类型和刷毛硬度是增加ΔRa 值的决定因素(P < 0.05)。一般来说,中硬刷毛的活性炭和美白牙膏比含氟牙膏和光滑刷毛产生更高的ΔRa。经过 1250 次刷牙模拟循环,与对照组相比,活性炭牙膏并没有增加牙釉质的粗糙度。然而,在经过 2500 次刷牙模拟循环的长时间刷牙后,使用软硬度刷毛表明,与对照组相比,活性炭牙膏与表面粗糙度增加有关(55.86±41.18nm),具有统计学意义(P = 0.024)。使用中硬度刷毛表明,美白(68.23±48.58nm)和活性炭(73.62±34.66nm)牙膏与常规牙膏(36.53±22.56nm)相比,显著增加了牙釉质粗糙度(P < 0.05)。使用硬刷毛时,各组之间没有显著差异,因为所有组都显示出牙釉质粗糙度增加。
使用活性炭和美白牙膏会增加牙釉质的粗糙度,特别是长期使用时。刷毛硬度对牙釉质粗糙度的影响取决于使用的牙膏类型。