Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 24;11(1):239. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01354-2.
Although psychiatric phenotypes are hypothesized to organize into a two-factor internalizing-externalizing structure, few studies have evaluated the structure of psychopathology in older adults, nor explored whether genome-wide polygenic scores (PGSs) are associated with psychopathology in a domain-specific manner. We used data from 6003 individuals of European ancestry from the Health and Retirement Study, a large population-based sample of older adults in the United States. Confirmatory factor analyses were applied to validated measures of psychopathology and PGSs were derived from well-powered genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Genomic SEM was implemented to construct latent PGSs for internalizing, externalizing, and general psychopathology. Phenotypically, the data were best characterized by a single general factor of psychopathology, a factor structure that was replicated across genders and age groups. Although externalizing PGSs (cannabis use, antisocial behavior, alcohol dependence, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) were not associated with any phenotypes, PGSs for major depressive disorder, neuroticism, and anxiety disorders were associated with both internalizing and externalizing phenotypes. Moreover, the variance explained in the general factor of psychopathology increased by twofold (from 1% to 2%) using the latent internalizing or latent one-factor PGSs, derived using weights from Genomic Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), compared with any of the individual PGSs. Collectively, results suggest that genetic risk factors for and phenotypic markers of psychiatric disorders are transdiagnostic in older adults of European ancestry. Alternative explanations are discussed, including methodological limitations of GWAS and phenotypic measurement of psychiatric outcome in large-scale population-based studies.
虽然精神科表型被假设为组织成两个因素的内倾-外倾结构,但很少有研究评估老年人精神病理学的结构,也没有探索全基因组多基因评分(PGS)是否以特定于域的方式与精神病理学相关。我们使用了来自美国大型基于人群的老年人健康与退休研究(Health and Retirement Study)的 6003 名欧洲血统个体的数据。确认性因素分析应用于经过验证的精神病理学测量,PGS 源自功能强大的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)。实施基因组结构方程建模(Genomic Structural Equation Modeling,SEM)以构建内倾、外倾和一般精神病理学的潜在 PGS。表型上,数据最好用一个单一的精神病理学综合因素来描述,这种因素结构在性别和年龄组中都得到了复制。虽然外倾 PGS(大麻使用、反社会行为、酒精依赖、注意力缺陷多动障碍)与任何表型都没有关联,但主要抑郁障碍、神经质和焦虑障碍的 PGS 与内倾和外倾表型都有关联。此外,使用来自基因组结构方程建模(SEM)的权重得出的潜在内倾或单因素 PGSs 增加了精神病理学综合因素的可解释方差两倍(从 1%增加到 2%),而与任何个体 PGSs 相比。总的来说,结果表明,欧洲血统的老年人群中,精神障碍的遗传风险因素和表型标志物是跨诊断的。讨论了替代解释,包括 GWAS 的方法学限制和基于人群的大型研究中精神病理学结果的表型测量。