Jiménez-Moya Gloria, Luengo Kanacri Bernadette Paula, Cumsille Patricio, Martínez M Loreto, Berger Christian
School of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 9;12:588017. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588017. eCollection 2021.
Previous research has focused on the relation between social class and prosocial behavior. However, this relation is yet unclear. In this work, we shed light on this issue by considering the effect of the level of empathy and the social class of the recipient of help on two types of prosociality, namely helping and caring. In one experimental study, we found that for high-class participants, empathy had a positive effect on helping, regardless of the recipient's social class. However, empathy had no effect for low-class participants. When it comes to caring, empathy had a positive effect for both high and low-class participants, but only when the recipient of help belonged to the same social class. This highlights that empathy by itself is not sufficient to promote cooperative relations and that the social class of the recipient of help should be taken into account to shed light on this issue.
以往的研究主要集中在社会阶层与亲社会行为之间的关系上。然而,这种关系尚不明朗。在这项研究中,我们通过考虑同理心水平和帮助接受者的社会阶层对两种亲社会行为(即帮助和关心)的影响,来阐明这一问题。在一项实验研究中,我们发现,对于高阶层参与者而言,无论帮助接受者的社会阶层如何,同理心对帮助行为都有积极影响。然而,同理心对低阶层参与者没有影响。在关心行为方面,同理心对高阶层和低阶层参与者都有积极影响,但前提是帮助接受者属于相同的社会阶层。这突出表明,同理心本身不足以促进合作关系,为阐明这一问题,应考虑帮助接受者的社会阶层。