• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用开放获取出版模式时的行为阻力:目标导向视角下的见解

Behavioral Reluctance in Adopting Open Access Publishing: Insights From a Goal-Directed Perspective.

作者信息

Köster Massimo, Moors Agnes, De Houwer Jan, Ross-Hellauer Tony, Van Nieuwerburgh Inge, Verbruggen Frederick

机构信息

Research Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 7;12:649915. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.649915. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.649915
PMID:33897558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8059406/
Abstract

Despite growing awareness of the benefits of large-scale open access publishing, individual researchers seem reluctant to adopt this behavior, thereby slowing down the evolution toward a new scientific culture. We outline and apply a goal-directed framework of behavior causation to shed light on this type of behavioral reluctance and to organize and suggest possible intervention strategies. The framework explains behavior as the result of a cycle of events starting with the detection of a discrepancy between a goal and a and the selection of behavior to reduce this discrepancy. We list various factors that may hinder this cycle and thus contribute to behavioral reluctance. After that, we highlight potential remedies to address each of the identified barriers. We thereby hope to point out new ways to think about behavioral reluctances in general, and in relation to open access publishing in particular.

摘要

尽管人们越来越意识到大规模开放获取出版的好处,但个别研究人员似乎不愿采取这种行为,从而减缓了向新科学文化演变的进程。我们概述并应用了一个目标导向的行为因果框架,以阐明这种行为上的不情愿,并组织和提出可能的干预策略。该框架将行为解释为一个事件循环的结果,这个循环始于发现目标与现状之间的差异,以及选择行为来减少这种差异。我们列出了可能阻碍这个循环从而导致行为不情愿的各种因素。之后,我们强调了针对每个已识别障碍的潜在补救措施。我们希望借此指出总体上思考行为不情愿的新方法,特别是与开放获取出版相关的行为不情愿的新方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b77/8059406/e68a98db2286/fpsyg-12-649915-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b77/8059406/de602d384125/fpsyg-12-649915-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b77/8059406/e68a98db2286/fpsyg-12-649915-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b77/8059406/de602d384125/fpsyg-12-649915-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b77/8059406/e68a98db2286/fpsyg-12-649915-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Behavioral Reluctance in Adopting Open Access Publishing: Insights From a Goal-Directed Perspective.采用开放获取出版模式时的行为阻力:目标导向视角下的见解
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 7;12:649915. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.649915. eCollection 2021.
2
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.一个学术团体对出版的看法。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
3
Assessing the publishing priorities and preferences among STEM researchers at a large R1 institution.评估一所大型研究型一类机构中STEM领域研究人员的出版优先级和偏好。
Heliyon. 2023 May 15;9(5):e16316. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16316. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review.特定学科的开放获取出版实践与变革障碍:基于证据的综述
F1000Res. 2018 Dec 11;7:1925. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17328.2. eCollection 2018.
5
Manuscript Submission Invitations from 'Predatory Journals': What Should Authors Do?来自“掠夺性期刊”的稿件提交邀请:作者该怎么做?
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 May;32(5):709-712. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.709.
6
False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals.假金:安全浏览开放获取出版以避免掠夺性出版商和期刊。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Apr;74(4):809-817. doi: 10.1111/jan.13483. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
7
Open access journals and forensic publishing.开放获取期刊与法医学出版
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(3):315-21.
8
The last bite was deadly--about responsibility in scientific publishing.最后一口是致命的——关于科学出版中的责任。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2014;57(2):95-9. doi: 10.3233/CH-141820.
9
Open access publishing in the biomedical sciences: could funding agencies accelerate the inevitable changes?生物医学领域的开放获取出版:资助机构能否加速这一不可避免的变革?
Health Info Libr J. 2006 Sep;23(3):197-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00657.x.
10
Ethics in Publishing: Complexity Science and Human Factors Offer Insights to Develop a Just Culture.出版伦理:复杂性科学与人为因素为建立公正文化提供见解
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Dec;22(6):1849-1854. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9735-0. Epub 2015 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Hurdles to open access publishing faced by authors: a scoping literature review from 2004 to 2023.作者面临的开放获取出版障碍:2004年至2023年的范围界定文献综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Aug 20;12(8):250257. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250257. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Toward equitable open research: stakeholder co-created recommendations for research institutions, funders and researchers.迈向公平的开放研究:利益相关者共同为研究机构、资助者和研究人员制定的建议
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Feb 1;10(2):221460. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221460. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Corrigendum: Environmentally Sustainable Food Consumption: A Review and Research Agenda From a Goal-Directed Perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Publishing habits and perceptions of open access publishing and public access amongst clinical and research fellows.临床和研究研究员的开放获取出版和公开获取的出版习惯和看法。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jan;108(1):47-58. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.751. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
2
The role of stimulus-driven versus goal-directed processes in fight and flight tendencies measured with motor evoked potentials induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.经颅磁刺激诱发运动诱发电位测量的打斗和逃跑倾向中刺激驱动与目标导向过程的作用。
PLoS One. 2019 May 20;14(5):e0217266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217266. eCollection 2019.
3
How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?
勘误:环境可持续性食品消费:基于目标导向视角的综述与研究议程。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 21;11:585387. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585387. eCollection 2020.
在评审、晋升和终身教职文件中,教师工作的公共维度有多重要?
Elife. 2019 Feb 12;8:e42254. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42254.
4
Survey on open peer review: Attitudes and experience amongst editors, authors and reviewers.开放同行评审调查:编辑、作者和评审人员的态度与经验
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 13;12(12):e0189311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189311. eCollection 2017.
5
How open science helps researchers succeed.开放科学如何助力研究人员取得成功。
Elife. 2016 Jul 7;5:e16800. doi: 10.7554/eLife.16800.
6
Perspective: Science is still too closed.观点:科学仍然过于封闭。
Nature. 2016 May 12;533(7602):S70. doi: 10.1038/533S70a.
7
Automaticity: Componential, Causal, and Mechanistic Explanations.自动性:成分、因果和机械论解释。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:263-87. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033550. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
Data sharing: Empty archives.数据共享:空档案。
Nature. 2009 Sep 10;461(7261):160-3. doi: 10.1038/461160a.
9
Normative orientations of university faculty and doctoral students.大学教师和博士生的规范取向。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Oct;6(4):443-61; discussion 463-5. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0002-6.