Jonsdottir Johanna, Baglio Francesca, Gindri Patrizia, Isernia Sara, Castiglioni Carlotta, Gramigna Cristina, Palumbo Giovanna, Pagliari Chiara, Di Tella Sonia, Perini Gloria, Bowman Thomas, Salza Marco, Molteni Franco
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
Ospedale San Camillo, Turin, Italy.
Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 7;12:601131. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.601131. eCollection 2021.
Continuity of care is an important issue in healthcare for persons after stroke. The present multi-center pilot study investigates the feasibility and efficiency of an innovative approach, the Human Empowerment Aging and Disability (HEAD), for digital-health motor and cognitive rehabilitation. The approach is explored within an in-clinic context (ClinicHEAD) and in continuity of care (HomeHEAD) for persons after chronic stroke. Thirty-four outpatients with chronic stroke (mean age 55 years, SD 13.7) participated. The HEAD VR protocol was administered in two consecutive phases: Phase I in clinic (ClinicHEAD) consisting of 4 weeks of 12 supervised HEAD rehabilitation sessions (45-min), including motor, cognitive and dual task for all participants; Phase II at home (HomeHEAD) consisted of 60 sessions of the same VR activities, 5 times/week for 3 months. All participants in the ClinicHEAD were allocated (ratio 1:2) to continue with tele-monitored home rehabilitation (HH, = 11) or to follow usual care (UC, = 23). Blind evaluation was carried out at baseline, after ClinicHEAD, after 3 months of HomeHEAD and at 3 months Follow-up. Primary outcomes were functional mobility [2-min Walking Test (2MWT)] and cognition [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)]. Feasibility and acceptance were assessed with adherence to treatment and the System Usability Satisfaction. Within group analyses were done with dependent samples -tests, and between groups HomeHEAD comparisons were carried out on change scores with independent samples -test ( = 0.05, two tailed). The HEAD protocol was feasible with good adherence both in the ClinicHEAD phase (92%) and HomeHEAD (89%) phase, along with good perceived system satisfaction. ClinicHEAD resulted in a significant increase in functional mobility (2MWT, = 0.02) and cognition (MoCA, = 0.003) and most secondary outcome variables. At 3 months follow up of HomeHEAD the HH_group showed a further significantly greater maintenance of functional mobility with respect to UC_group ( = 0.04). The HEAD VR protocol was feasible in clinical and at home tele-rehabilitation for persons in the chronic phase after stroke. In clinic the approach was effective in augmenting motor and cognitive abilities and at home it was effective in longterm maintenance of functional mobility, indicating its usefulness in continuity of care. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03025126.
对于中风后的患者而言,持续护理是医疗保健中的一个重要问题。目前的多中心试点研究调查了一种创新方法——人类赋权衰老与残疾(HEAD)在数字健康运动和认知康复方面的可行性和效率。该方法在慢性中风患者的门诊环境(门诊HEAD)和持续护理(家庭HEAD)中进行探索。34名慢性中风门诊患者(平均年龄55岁,标准差13.7)参与了研究。HEAD虚拟现实方案分两个连续阶段实施:第一阶段在门诊(门诊HEAD),为期4周,共12次有监督的HEAD康复训练(每次45分钟),所有参与者都要进行运动、认知和双重任务训练;第二阶段在家中(家庭HEAD),包括60次相同的虚拟现实活动,每周5次,持续3个月。门诊HEAD的所有参与者按1:2的比例被分配继续接受远程监测的家庭康复(HH组,n = 11)或接受常规护理(UC组,n = 23)。在基线、门诊HEAD结束后、家庭HEAD进行3个月后以及随访3个月时进行盲法评估。主要结局指标为功能移动性[2分钟步行试验(2MWT)]和认知[蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)]。通过治疗依从性和系统可用性满意度评估可行性和可接受性。组内分析采用相关样本t检验,组间家庭HEAD比较采用独立样本t检验对变化分数进行分析(α = 0.05,双侧)。HEAD方案是可行的,在门诊HEAD阶段(92%)和家庭HEAD阶段(89%)都有良好的依从性,同时系统满意度也较高。门诊HEAD使功能移动性(2MWT,P = 0.02)和认知(MoCA,P = 0.003)以及大多数次要结局变量显著增加。在家庭HEAD随访3个月时,HH组在功能移动性维持方面相对于UC组进一步显著提高(P = 0.04)。HEAD虚拟现实方案在中风后慢性期患者的临床和家庭远程康复中是可行的。在门诊,该方法在增强运动和认知能力方面有效,在家中,它在功能移动性的长期维持方面有效,表明其在持续护理中的有用性。ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03025126。