Suppr超能文献

微创骶髂关节融合翻修术:技术指南

Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Fusion Revision: A Technique Guide.

作者信息

Cognetti Daniel J, Jorgensen Anton Y

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Brooke Army Medical Center, Houston, Texas.

Ortho San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):274-279. doi: 10.14444/8037. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-series of revision sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusions.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a technique guide for revision minimally invasive SIJ fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

SIJ dysfunction is a prevalent, yet underdiagnosed condition. This disparity exists as a result of diagnostic complexity and lack of a viable surgical treatment option. However, the advent of minimally invasive SIJ fusion has created a resurgence of interest in this debilitating condition. Multiple studies have reported on the increased use of minimally invasive SIJ fusion in recent years, but there is a paucity of literature on management in a revision setting.

METHODS

A case series of 5 patients from a single academic tertiary referral center over a 3-year period will serve to highlight technical pearls and considerations in SIJ fusion revision. Revision SIJ fusions were identified through a retrospective review of a surgical database and demographic, surgical, and radiographic data were obtained through review of the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Five patients underwent SIJ fusion revision from 2015 to 2018. There were 3 main modes of failure, with indications for revision including nerve root irritation and SIJ pain recurrence. The mean age at time of revision was 48.8 ± 14.3 years, and the mean follow-up after revision was 2.0 + 0.9 years. Familiarity with SIJ anatomy and use of stereotactic navigation can improve implant position and purchase. Additionally, bone graft and bone morphogenetic protein can be used to fill in old implant tracks and to augment bony ingrowth and ongrowth of new implants.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased use of SIJ fusion creates a demand for comprehensive revision strategies and necessitates familiarity with SIJ anatomy. Preoperative planning to determine causes of failure and use of intraoperative navigation are essential to help surgeons better understand the preferential trajectory for each implant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

骶髂关节(SIJ)翻修融合术的回顾性病例系列研究。

目的

为微创SIJ翻修融合术提供技术技术技术学技术指导。

背景资料总结

SIJ功能障碍是一种常见但诊断不足的病症。这种差异的存在是由于诊断复杂性和缺乏可行的手术治疗选择。然而,微创SIJ融合术的出现重新引发了人们对这种使人衰弱病症的兴趣。多项研究报告了近年来微创SIJ融合术的使用增加,但关于翻修情况下的治疗的文献却很少。

方法

一个病例系列,包含来自单一学术三级转诊中心的5例患者,为期3年,将突出SIJ融合翻修术中的技术要点和注意事项。通过对手术数据库的回顾性分析确定翻修SIJ融合术病例,并通过查阅电子病历获取人口统计学、手术和影像学数据。

结果

2015年至2018年期间,5例患者接受了SIJ融合翻修术。有3种主要的失败模式,翻修指征包括神经根刺激和SIJ疼痛复发。翻修时的平均年龄为48.8±14.3岁,翻修后的平均随访时间为2.0 + 0.9年。熟悉SIJ解剖结构并使用立体定向导航可以改善植入物的位置和固定。此外,骨移植和骨形态发生蛋白可用于填充旧的植入物通道,并促进新植入物的骨向内生长和骨附着生长。

结论

SIJ融合术使用的增加对全面的翻修策略提出了需求,并且需要熟悉SIJ解剖结构。术前规划以确定失败原因并使用术中导航对于帮助外科医生更好地了解每个植入物的优先轨迹至关重要。

证据级别

4级。

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Fusion Revision: A Technique Guide.微创骶髂关节融合翻修术:技术指南
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):274-279. doi: 10.14444/8037. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节稳定术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(2 Suppl):Editorial. doi: 10.3171/2013.V2.FOCUS13273.
9
Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.三叶状钛植入物用于骶髂关节融合。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr;28(4):727-734. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5860-1. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
10
Surgical Revision after Sacroiliac Joint Fixation or Fusion.骶髂关节固定或融合后的手术翻修
Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Jan 19;11(1):5. doi: 10.14444/4005. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

6
How often is low back pain not coming from the back?下背痛并非源于背部的情况有多常见?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 1;34(1):E27-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818b8882.
8
The sacroiliac joint in chronic low back pain.慢性下腰痛中的骶髂关节
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jan 1;20(1):31-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199501000-00007.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验