Kim Su Min, Yun Sung Wook, Cho Gil Jae
College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea.
College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Equine Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Korea.
Anim Biosci. 2021 Sep;34(9):1460-1465. doi: 10.5713/ab.20.0860. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
The study aimed to evaluate the diversity of donkey populations by comparing with the diversity of Thoroughbred and Jeju Halla horses; identified breeding backgrounds can contribute to management and conservation of donkeys in South Korea.
A total of 100 horse (50 Thoroughbreds and 50 Jeju Halla horses) and 79 donkeys samples were genotyped with 15 microsatellite markers (AHT4, AHT5, ASB2, ASB17, ASB23, CA425, HMS1, HMS2, HMS3, HMS6, HMS7, HTG4, HTG10, LEX3, and VHL20), to identify genetic diversity and relationships among horses and donkeys.
The observed number of alleles per locus ranged from 1 (ASB17, HMS1) to 14 (AHT5), with a mean value of 4.87, 8.00, and 5.87 in Thoroughbreds, Jeju Halla horses, and donkeys, respectively. Of the 15 markers, AHT4, AHT5, ASB23, CA425, HMS2, HMS3, HTG4, HTG10, and LEX3 loci had relatively high polymorphism information content (PIC) values (PIC>0.5) in these three populations. Mean levels of genetic variation were HE = 0.6721 and HO = 0.6600 in Thoroughbreds, HE = 0.7898 and HO = 0.7100 in Jeju Halla horses, and HE = 0.5635 and HO = 0.4861 in donkeys. Of the 15 loci in donkeys, three loci had negative inbreeding coefficients (FIS), with a moderate mean FIS (0.138). The FIS estimate for the HTG4 marker was highest (0.531) and HMS6 marker was lowest (-0.001). The total probability of exclusion value of 15 microsatellite loci was 0.9996 in donkeys.
Genetic cluster analysis showed that the genetic relationship among 79 donkeys was generally consistent with pedigree records. Among the three breeds, donkeys and Thoroughbred horses formed clearly different groups, but the group of Jeju Halla horses overlapped with that of Thoroughbred horses, suggesting that the loci would be suitable for donkey parentage testing. Therefore, the results of this study are a valid tool for genetic study and conservation of donkeys.
本研究旨在通过与纯种马和济州汉拿马的多样性进行比较,评估驴种群的多样性;确定的繁殖背景有助于韩国驴的管理和保护。
使用15个微卫星标记(AHT4、AHT5、ASB2、ASB17、ASB23、CA425、HMS1、HMS2、HMS3、HMS6、HMS7、HTG4、HTG10、LEX3和VHL20)对总共100匹马(50匹纯种马和50匹济州汉拿马)和79头驴的样本进行基因分型,以确定马和驴之间的遗传多样性及亲缘关系。
每个位点观察到的等位基因数范围为1(ASB17、HMS1)至14(AHT5),纯种马、济州汉拿马和驴的平均值分别为4.87、8.00和5.87。在这15个标记中,AHT4、AHT5、ASB23、CA425、HMS2、HMS3、HTG4、HTG10和LEX3位点在这三个种群中具有相对较高的多态性信息含量(PIC)值(PIC>0.5)。纯种马的平均遗传变异水平为HE = 0.6721,HO = 0.6600;济州汉拿马为HE = 0.7898,HO = 0.7100;驴为HE = 0.5635,HO = 0.4861。在驴的15个位点中,三个位点的近交系数(FIS)为负,平均FIS为中等水平(0.138)。HTG4标记的FIS估计值最高(0.531),HMS6标记最低(-0.001)。驴的15个微卫星位点的总排除概率值为0.9996。
遗传聚类分析表明,79头驴之间的遗传关系总体上与系谱记录一致。在这三个品种中,驴和纯种马形成了明显不同的群体,但济州汉拿马群体与纯种马群体重叠,表明这些位点适用于驴的亲子鉴定。因此,本研究结果是驴遗传研究和保护的有效工具。