• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于多重放大倍率的机器学习作为乳腺癌保乳手术标本切缘病理评估的辅助工具。

Multi-magnification-based machine learning as an ancillary tool for the pathologic assessment of shaved margins for breast carcinoma lumpectomy specimens.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Mod Pathol. 2021 Aug;34(8):1487-1494. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00807-9. Epub 2021 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1038/s41379-021-00807-9
PMID:33903728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9906995/
Abstract

The surgical margin status of breast lumpectomy specimens for invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) guides clinical decisions, as positive margins are associated with higher rates of local recurrence. The "cavity shave" method of margin assessment has the benefits of allowing the surgeon to orient shaved margins intraoperatively and the pathologist to assess one inked margin per specimen. We studied whether a deep convolutional neural network, a deep multi-magnification network (DMMN), could accurately segment carcinoma from benign tissue in whole slide images (WSIs) of shave margin slides, and therefore serve as a potential screening tool to improve the efficiency of microscopic evaluation of these specimens. Applying the pretrained DMMN model, or the initial model, to a validation set of 408 WSIs (348 benign, 60 with carcinoma) achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.941. After additional manual annotations and fine-tuning of the model, the updated model achieved an AUC of 0.968 with sensitivity set at 100% and corresponding specificity of 78%. We applied the initial model and updated model to a testing set of 427 WSIs (374 benign, 53 with carcinoma) which showed AUC values of 0.900 and 0.927, respectively. Using the pixel classification threshold selected from the validation set, the model achieved a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 78%. The four false-negative classifications resulted from two small foci of DCIS (1 mm, 0.5 mm) and two foci of well-differentiated invasive carcinoma (3 mm, 1.5 mm). This proof-of-principle study demonstrates that a DMMN machine learning model can segment invasive carcinoma and DCIS in surgical margin specimens with high accuracy and has the potential to be used as a screening tool for pathologic assessment of these specimens.

摘要

乳腺肿瘤切除术标本中浸润性癌和导管原位癌(DCIS)的手术切缘状态指导临床决策,因为阳性切缘与更高的局部复发率相关。评估切缘的“腔面刮除”方法具有允许外科医生在手术中对刮除的切缘进行定位以及病理学家对每个标本评估一个墨染切缘的优势。我们研究了深度卷积神经网络(一种深度多倍放大网络,DMMN)是否可以准确地对切除边缘玻片的全玻片图像(WSI)中的癌组织与良性组织进行分割,从而作为一种潜在的筛选工具,以提高这些标本的显微镜评估效率。将预训练的 DMMN 模型或初始模型应用于 408 张 WSI(348 张良性,60 张癌性)的验证集,获得曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.941。在对模型进行额外的手动注释和微调后,更新后的模型的 AUC 为 0.968,灵敏度设置为 100%,相应的特异性为 78%。我们将初始模型和更新模型应用于 427 张 WSI(374 张良性,53 张癌性)的测试集,分别得到 AUC 值 0.900 和 0.927。使用从验证集选择的像素分类阈值,模型的灵敏度为 92%,特异性为 78%。四次假阴性分类结果归因于两个小的 DCIS 病灶(1mm,0.5mm)和两个分化良好的浸润性癌病灶(3mm,1.5mm)。这项初步研究表明,DMMN 机器学习模型可以高精度地对手术切缘标本中的浸润性癌和 DCIS 进行分割,并且有可能作为这些标本病理评估的筛选工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/65ad7a39250d/nihms-1683475-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/fca68c5538ba/nihms-1683475-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/26ace23fbf2d/nihms-1683475-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/a583219a21c8/nihms-1683475-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/5b3ee5ce9f46/nihms-1683475-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/c7a2876dbd24/nihms-1683475-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/5fa48532c831/nihms-1683475-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/65ad7a39250d/nihms-1683475-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/fca68c5538ba/nihms-1683475-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/26ace23fbf2d/nihms-1683475-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/a583219a21c8/nihms-1683475-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/5b3ee5ce9f46/nihms-1683475-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/c7a2876dbd24/nihms-1683475-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/5fa48532c831/nihms-1683475-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cd1/9906995/65ad7a39250d/nihms-1683475-f0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Multi-magnification-based machine learning as an ancillary tool for the pathologic assessment of shaved margins for breast carcinoma lumpectomy specimens.基于多重放大倍率的机器学习作为乳腺癌保乳手术标本切缘病理评估的辅助工具。
Mod Pathol. 2021 Aug;34(8):1487-1494. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00807-9. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
2
Should New "No Ink On Tumor" Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines be Applied to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)? A Retrospective Review Using Shaved Cavity Margins.新的“肿瘤无墨水”乳房肿瘤切除术切缘指南是否应应用于导管原位癌(DCIS)?一项使用刮除腔切缘的回顾性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(11):3453-3458. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5251-y. Epub 2016 May 20.
3
Prognostic factors for residual occult disease in shave margins during partial mastectomy.保乳手术切缘中隐匿性疾病残留的预后因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Sep;189(2):471-481. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06282-9. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
4
Defining the clinical target volume for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation: a pathologic analysis.确定接受保乳手术和加速部分乳腺照射治疗的早期乳腺癌患者的临床靶体积:一项病理分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 1;60(3):722-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.012.
5
Mastectomy or Margin Re-excision? A Nomogram for Close/Positive Margins After Lumpectomy for DCIS.保乳术后切缘阳性或切缘再次切除?用于 DCIS 保乳术后切缘阳性或切缘再次切除的列线图。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;29(6):3740-3748. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11293-3. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
6
Comparison of margin assessment by radial and shave sections in wide local excision specimens for invasive carcinoma of the breast.乳腺浸润性癌广泛局部切除标本中放射状和梭形切片评估切缘的比较。
Histopathology. 2010 Apr;56(5):573-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03518.x.
7
Similar rates of residual disease in patients with DCIS within 2 mm of lumpectomy margin regardless of the presence of invasive carcinoma.保乳手术切缘 2mm 内有或无浸润性癌的 DCIS 患者残留疾病发生率相似。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;186(3):807-814. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06026-1. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
8
Histological margin assessment for breast ductal carcinoma in situ: precision and implications.乳腺导管原位癌的组织学切缘评估:准确性及意义
Mod Pathol. 2004 Jan;17(1):81-8. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800019.
9
Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?术中触摸准备细胞学检查;它在再切除乳房肿块切除术中起作用吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;14(3):1045-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9263-x. Epub 2007 Jan 6.
10
Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.新的保乳手术切缘指南对保乳手术的影响:再次切除率及残余肿瘤预测率的变化
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar;23(3):729-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4916-2. Epub 2015 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Hyperspectral dark-field microscopy of human breast lumpectomy samples for tumor margin detection in breast-conserving surgery.人乳腺肿瘤切除术样本的高光谱暗场显微镜在保乳手术中用于肿瘤边缘检测。
J Biomed Opt. 2024 Sep;29(9):093503. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.9.093503. Epub 2024 May 7.
2
Adherence to Quality Indicators for Breast Cancer Management in a Multidisciplinary Training Program.多学科培训项目中乳腺癌管理质量指标的依从性
J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 8;13(12):1693. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121693.
3
An AI-assisted tool for efficient prostate cancer diagnosis in low-grade and low-volume cases.

本文引用的文献

1
Deep Multi-Magnification Networks for multi-class breast cancer image segmentation.用于多类乳腺癌图像分割的深度多重放大网络。
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2021 Mar;88:101866. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101866. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
DEEP LEARNING-BASED ASSESSMENT OF TUMOR-ASSOCIATED STROMA FOR DIAGNOSING BREAST CANCER IN HISTOPATHOLOGY IMAGES.基于深度学习的肿瘤相关基质评估在组织病理学图像中诊断乳腺癌
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2017 Apr;2017:929-932. doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2017.7950668. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
3
Whole slide imaging equivalency and efficiency study: experience at a large academic center.
一种用于低级别和低容量病例中高效前列腺癌诊断的人工智能辅助工具。
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Nov 29;3(12):100642. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100642. eCollection 2022 Dec 9.
4
Deep Interactive Learning-based ovarian cancer segmentation of H&E-stained whole slide images to study morphological patterns of BRCA mutation.基于深度交互式学习的苏木精-伊红染色全切片图像的卵巢癌分割,以研究BRCA突变的形态学模式。
J Pathol Inform. 2022 Nov 26;14:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100160. eCollection 2023.
5
Multi-modality artificial intelligence in digital pathology.多模态人工智能在数字病理学中的应用。
Brief Bioinform. 2022 Nov 19;23(6). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac367.
6
Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring.胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的 Ki-67 评估:手动与数字病理学评分的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mod Pathol. 2022 Jun;35(6):712-720. doi: 10.1038/s41379-022-01055-1. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
全 slides 成像等效性和效率研究:大型学术中心的经验。
Mod Pathol. 2019 Jul;32(7):916-928. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0205-0. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
4
From Detection of Individual Metastases to Classification of Lymph Node Status at the Patient Level: The CAMELYON17 Challenge.从检测单个转移灶到对患者水平的淋巴结状态进行分类:CAMELYON17 挑战赛。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Feb;38(2):550-560. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2867350.
5
Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype.使用深度学习进行图像分析以预测乳腺癌分级、雌激素受体状态、组织学亚型和内在亚型。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2018 Sep 3;4:30. doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0079-1. eCollection 2018.
6
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves: review of methods with applications in diagnostic medicine.受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线:方法综述及其在诊断医学中的应用。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Mar 29;63(7):07TR01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab4b1.
7
Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.用于检测乳腺癌女性患者淋巴结转移的深度学习算法的诊断评估
JAMA. 2017 Dec 12;318(22):2199-2210. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14585.
8
Accurate and reproducible invasive breast cancer detection in whole-slide images: A Deep Learning approach for quantifying tumor extent.全切片图像中精确且可重复的浸润性乳腺癌检测:一种用于量化肿瘤范围的深度学习方法。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 18;7:46450. doi: 10.1038/srep46450.
9
The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.保乳治疗的导管原位癌女性患者手术切缘与局部复发的相关性:一项荟萃分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov;23(12):3811-3821. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5446-2. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
10
Mitosis detection in breast cancer pathology images by combining handcrafted and convolutional neural network features.通过结合手工制作的特征和卷积神经网络特征来检测乳腺癌病理图像中的有丝分裂。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2014 Oct;1(3):034003. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.1.3.034003. Epub 2014 Oct 10.