• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济支付能否激励骨科创伤患者短期戒烟?来自一项离散选择实验的证据。

Can financial payments incentivize short-term smoking cessation in orthopaedic trauma patients? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Alkhoury Dana, Atchison Jared, Trujillo Antonio J, Oslin Kimberly, Frey Katherine P, O'Toole Robert V, Castillo Renan C, O'Hara Nathan N

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 110 South Paca St., Suite 300, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Health Econ Rev. 2021 Apr 26;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00313-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13561-021-00313-3
PMID:33903947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8077692/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smoking increases the risk of complications and related costs after an orthopaedic fracture. Research in other populations suggests that a one-time payment may incentivize smoking cessation. However, little is known on fracture patients' willingness to accept financial incentives to stop smoking; and the level of incentive required to motivate smoking cessation in this population. This study aimed to estimate the financial threshold required to motivate fracture patients to stop smoking after injury.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study utilized a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to elicit patient preferences towards financial incentives and reduced complications associated with smoking cessation. We presented participants with 12 hypothetical options with several attributes with varying levels. The respondents' data was used to determine the utility of each attribute level and the relative importance associated with each attribute.

RESULTS

Of the 130 enrolled patients, 79% reported an interest in quitting smoking. We estimated the financial incentive to be of greater relative importance (ri) (45%) than any of the included clinical benefits of smoking cessations (deep infection (ri: 24%), bone healing complications (ri: 19%), and superficial infections (ri: 12%)). A one-time payment of $800 provided the greatest utility to the respondents (0.64, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.93), surpassing the utility associated with a single $1000 financial incentive (0.36, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Financial incentives may be an effective tool to promote smoking cessation in the orthopaedic trauma population. The findings of this study define optimal payment thresholds for smoking cessation programs.

摘要

背景

吸烟会增加骨科骨折后出现并发症的风险及相关费用。对其他人群的研究表明,一次性付款可能会激励戒烟。然而,对于骨折患者接受经济激励以戒烟的意愿以及促使该人群戒烟所需的激励水平,我们知之甚少。本研究旨在估计促使骨折患者受伤后戒烟所需的经济阈值。

方法

这项横断面研究采用离散选择实验(DCE)来了解患者对经济激励以及与戒烟相关的并发症减少的偏好。我们向参与者展示了12个具有不同属性水平的假设选项。受访者的数据用于确定每个属性水平的效用以及与每个属性相关的相对重要性。

结果

在130名登记患者中,79%表示有戒烟意愿。我们估计经济激励的相对重要性(ri)(45%)高于戒烟所带来的任何一项临床益处(深部感染(ri:24%)、骨愈合并发症(ri:19%)和浅表感染(ri:12%))。一次性支付800美元给受访者带来的效用最大(0.64,95%置信区间:0.36至0.93),超过了单次1000美元经济激励带来的效用(0.36,95%置信区间:0.18至0.55)。

结论

经济激励可能是促进骨科创伤人群戒烟的有效工具。本研究结果确定了戒烟项目的最佳支付阈值。

相似文献

1
Can financial payments incentivize short-term smoking cessation in orthopaedic trauma patients? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment.经济支付能否激励骨科创伤患者短期戒烟?来自一项离散选择实验的证据。
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Apr 26;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00313-3.
2
The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.经济激励措施对初级保健医生所提供医疗服务质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD008451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008451.pub2.
3
Benefits of Incentives for Breastfeeding and Smoking cessation in pregnancy (BIBS): a mixed-methods study to inform trial design.孕期母乳喂养及戒烟激励措施的益处(BIBS):一项为试验设计提供信息的混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(30):1-522, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta19300.
4
Design of Financial Incentive Programs for Smoking Cessation: A Discrete Choice Experiment.设计戒烟的金融激励计划:离散选择实验。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Oct 17;24(10):1661-1668. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac042.
5
Acceptability of Financial Incentives for Health Behaviours: A Discrete Choice Experiment.健康行为经济激励措施的可接受性:一项离散选择实验
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 17;11(6):e0157403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157403. eCollection 2016.
6
Going Once, Going Twice: Using Willingness-to-Accept Auctions to Promote Smoking Cessation.一次叫价,两次叫价:利用接受意愿拍卖来促进戒烟。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(9):1632-1635. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa065.
7
Perceptions of Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation: A Survey of Smokers in a Country With an Endgame Goal.对戒烟经济激励措施的看法:一个有最终目标国家的吸烟者调查。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Nov 15;20(12):1481-1488. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx268.
8
Patient preferences for nutritional supplementation to improve fracture healing: a discrete choice experiment.患者对改善骨折愈合的营养补充剂的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 12;8(4):e019685. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019685.
9
Medicaid Incentives for Preventing Chronic Disease: Effects of Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation.医疗补助预防慢性病的激励措施:戒烟经济激励的效果
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):5016-5034. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12994. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
10
Orthopaedic trauma patients and smoking: Knowledge deficits and interest in quitting.骨科创伤患者与吸烟:知识欠缺及戒烟意愿
Injury. 2016 Jun;47(6):1206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
2
Investigating patients' preferences for new anti-diabetic drugs to inform public health insurance coverage decisions: a discrete choice experiment in China.调查患者对新型抗糖尿病药物的偏好,为公共医疗保险覆盖决策提供信息:在中国进行的一项离散选择实验。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;22(1):1860. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14244-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment preference among patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA): a discrete choice experiment.脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)患者的治疗偏好:离散选择实验。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Jan 20;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01667-3.
2
A qualitative study to identify critical attributes and attribute-levels for a discrete choice experiment on oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery among young people in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa.一项定性研究,旨在确定南非开普敦和约翰内斯堡年轻人中口服暴露前预防(PrEP)提供的离散选择实验的关键属性和属性水平。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05942-8.
3
The influence of smoking on foot and ankle surgery: a review of the literature.
吸烟对足踝外科的影响:文献回顾。
Foot (Edinb). 2021 Mar;46:101735. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2020.101735. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
4
Preferential differences in vaccination decision-making for oneself or one's child in The Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment.荷兰人在为自己或孩子接种疫苗时的决策偏好差异:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08844-w.
5
Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation in Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.住院患者戒烟的经济激励措施:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Med. 2020 Jun;133(6):741-749. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.025. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
6
Prevalence of Deep Surgical Site Infection After Repair of Periarticular Knee Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.关节周围膝关节骨折修复术后深部手术部位感染的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199951. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9951.
7
Smoking Effects in Foot and Ankle Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review.足部和踝关节手术中的吸烟影响:基于证据的综述。
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Oct;40(10):1226-1232. doi: 10.1177/1071100719867942. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
8
Incentives for smoking cessation.戒烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 17;7(7):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub6.
9
Effect of prepaid and promised financial incentive on follow-up survey response in cigarette smokers: a randomized controlled trial.预付和承诺经济激励对吸烟者随访调查反应的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0786-9.
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of incentives as a tool for prevention of non-communicable diseases: A systematic review.激励措施作为预防非传染性疾病工具的效果和成本效益:系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:340-350. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 May 17.