Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles; Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York.
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles.
Am J Med. 2020 Jun;133(6):741-749. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.025. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
Financial incentives for smoking cessation and use of evidence-based therapy may increase quitting rates and reduce health and economic disparities.
We randomized a low-income population of 182 hospitalized patients (mean age 58 years, 45% with high school education or less) to enhanced usual care, which included hospital-directed cessation care and Quitline referral or enhanced usual care plus financial incentives. All patients received enhanced usual care, while participants randomized to the financial incentives group were also eligible to receive up to $550 for participation in Quitline counseling ($50), participation in a community-based cessation program ($50), use of pharmacotherapy ($50), and biochemically confirmed smoking cessation at 2 months ($150) and 6 months ($250). Primary outcome was biochemically confirmed smoking cessation at 6 months after hospital discharge.
Total mean payment was $84 (standard deviation [SD] = $133) in the incentive group. The 6-month rate of biochemically confirmed smoking cessation was 19.6% in the incentive group and 8.9% in the enhanced usual care group (odds ratio [OR] 2.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 7.83, P = 0.10). Participants in the incentive group had higher rates of nicotine replacement therapy use (57.3% vs 31.3%, P = 0.002). Financial incentives did not improve subjective social status but did increase financial stress.
Rates of bioconfirmed smoking cessation were higher among hospitalized patients randomized to financial incentives compared to usual care alone, but the difference was not significant. Considering the frequency of low payouts and the importance of assistance for successful quitting, future studies should explore the effectiveness of financial incentives sufficiently large to overcome barriers to evidence-based therapy.
为戒烟和使用基于证据的疗法提供经济激励可能会提高戒烟率,并减少健康和经济方面的差距。
我们将 182 名住院患者(平均年龄 58 岁,45%的人受过高中教育或以下)随机分为强化常规护理组,其中包括医院指导的戒烟护理和戒烟热线转介,或强化常规护理加经济激励。所有患者都接受了强化常规护理,而随机分配到经济激励组的患者也有资格获得高达 550 美元的奖励,用于参加戒烟热线咨询(50 美元)、参加社区戒烟计划(50 美元)、使用药物治疗(50 美元)以及在出院后 2 个月(150 美元)和 6 个月(250 美元)时通过生物化学方法确认戒烟。主要结局是出院后 6 个月时通过生物化学方法确认的戒烟。
激励组的平均总支付额为 84 美元(标准差 [SD] = 133 美元)。激励组在 6 个月时通过生物化学方法确认的戒烟率为 19.6%,强化常规护理组为 8.9%(比值比 [OR] 2.56;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.84 至 7.83,P = 0.10)。激励组使用尼古丁替代疗法的比例更高(57.3%对 31.3%,P = 0.002)。经济激励并没有改善主观社会地位,但确实增加了经济压力。
与单独接受常规护理相比,随机分配到经济激励组的住院患者通过生物化学方法确认的戒烟率更高,但差异无统计学意义。考虑到低报酬的频率和成功戒烟所需的帮助的重要性,未来的研究应该充分探索经济激励的有效性,以克服对基于证据的治疗的障碍。