Suppr超能文献

双眼单视的推拉测量和视野:英国和爱尔兰的视光学实践。

Measurement of ductions and fields of binocular single vision (BSV): orthoptic practice in the UK and Ireland.

机构信息

Orthoptic Department, Blackpool Teaching Hospital, Blackpool.

Division of Ophthalmology and Orthoptics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield.

出版信息

Strabismus. 2021 Jun;29(2):95-101. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2021.1914679. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

Abstract

To evaluate the current clinical practice of quantifying ductions and fields of BSV in the UK and Ireland using an online questionnaire. An anonymous online questionnaire with twenty-one questions was distributed in February 2019 via the British and Irish Orthoptic Society (BIOS) members' newsletter. Objectives were to investigate: methods used, frequency of assessment, limiting factors and opinions of importance. Informed consent was gained to include the responses in the study. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Testing. The questionnaire was completed by 105 orthoptists. The methods reported to quantify ductions and fields of BSV respectively were: Goldmann (33% and 34%), Aimark (22 and 23%), Lister (7%), Octopus (5 and 4%), Thomson ocular motility analyzer (2 and 3%), Binocular vision analyzer (2%) and no method reported (30% and 32%). The frequency of measuring ductions and fields of BSV per week (median 1-2) was significantly less than the number of patients seen with limited ocular motility per week (median 6-9). The main reasons for never or rarely measuring ductions or fields of BSV were not enough time, no method available and only on selected patients. Respondents indicated that they would measure ductions and fields of BSV more frequently if a quicker portable method was available (median 3-5 times per week). Most agreed that measurements of ductions and fields of BSV are important (89 and 95% respectively). There is no standardized method of quantitively measuring ductions or fields of BSV, with almost a third of respondents not measuring either. Although most orthoptists agreed these measurements are important, they are infrequently performed. The main factors limiting these assessments are insufficient time and lack of a testing method. If a faster portable device was available, orthoptists would measure ductions and fields of BSV more frequently.

摘要

为了评估英国和爱尔兰目前使用在线问卷量化 BSV 引出和视野的临床实践,我们进行了一项研究。2019 年 2 月,通过英国和爱尔兰视光学协会(BIOS)成员的时事通讯,分发了一份包含 21 个问题的匿名在线问卷。研究目的是调查:使用的方法、评估的频率、限制因素以及重要性的看法。在将回复纳入研究的过程中,获得了知情同意。使用描述性统计和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验对数据进行了分析。共有 105 名视光师完成了问卷。分别报告的量化 BSV 引出和视野的方法是:Goldmann(33%和 34%)、Aimark(22%和 23%)、Lister(7%)、Octopus(5%和 4%)、Thomson 眼动分析仪(2%和 3%)、双眼视觉分析仪(2%)和未报告方法(30%和 32%)。每周测量 BSV 引出和视野的频率(中位数 1-2)显著低于每周检查有限眼球运动的患者数量(中位数 6-9)。从未或很少测量 BSV 引出或视野的主要原因是没有足够的时间、没有可用的方法以及仅对选定的患者进行测量。如果有更快的便携式方法,受访者表示他们会更频繁地测量 BSV 引出和视野(中位数每周 3-5 次)。大多数人同意测量 BSV 引出和视野很重要(分别为 89%和 95%)。目前没有标准化的定量测量 BSV 引出或视野的方法,近三分之一的受访者未进行这两种测量。尽管大多数视光师认为这些测量很重要,但它们的执行频率较低。限制这些评估的主要因素是时间不足和缺乏测试方法。如果有更快的便携式设备,视光师会更频繁地测量 BSV 引出和视野。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验