Department of Ophthalmology, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Korea.
Department of Ophthalmology, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Nov 1;10(13):1. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.13.1.
To report a novel technique for measuring ocular ductions and evaluate its performance in normal participants.
We developed a laser pointer technique (LPT), a novel technique for quantitative measurement of ocular ductions. The device consists of a screen and headset with a laser pointer. Participants rotate their head while wearing the headset maintaining fixation on an optotype in the center of the screen until the target becomes blurry. Twenty-eight healthy volunteers were enrolled. The ocular ductions were measured with the LPT and compared to those of the Goldmann perimeter technique (GPT).
The mean horizontal and vertical duction ranges were 95.2° ± 10.1° and 84.1° ± 10.8° using the LPT, respectively, and 113.2° ± 14.1° and 105.8° ± 12.5° using the GPT, respectively; both were significantly greater in the GPT than LPT (both P < 0.05). The total time required for testing was shorter with the LPT compared to the GPT (56.1 ± 4.5 seconds and 92.3 ± 11.6 seconds, P = 0.003). Both the LPT and GPT measurements showed excellent intraobserver repeatability, and LPT showed better interobserver repeatability.
Considering its reproducibility, accuracy, and simplicity, the LPT is expected to be useful for evaluating patients with ocular motility disorders as a first-order evaluation in the absence of sophisticated examination devices.
The laser pointer technique, the new method for measuring ocular ductions, could be useful for evaluating patients with ocular motility disorders in clinical practice.
报告一种测量眼球运动的新方法,并评估其在正常参与者中的性能。
我们开发了一种激光指针技术(LPT),这是一种用于定量测量眼球运动的新技术。该设备由一个屏幕和一个带有激光指针的耳机组成。参与者在佩戴耳机时转动头部,同时将目光固定在屏幕中央的视标上,直到目标变得模糊。共招募了 28 名健康志愿者。使用 LPT 和 Goldmann 周边视野仪(GPT)测量眼球运动,并对其进行比较。
使用 LPT 测量的水平和垂直眼球运动范围分别为 95.2°±10.1°和 84.1°±10.8°,使用 GPT 测量的分别为 113.2°±14.1°和 105.8°±12.5°;GPT 测量的结果均显著大于 LPT(均 P<0.05)。与 GPT 相比,LPT 测试所需的总时间更短(分别为 56.1±4.5 秒和 92.3±11.6 秒,P=0.003)。LPT 和 GPT 测量均显示出良好的观察者内重复性,LPT 显示出更好的观察者间重复性。
考虑到其可重复性、准确性和简单性,LPT 有望成为评估眼部运动障碍患者的有用工具,可作为在缺乏复杂检查设备的情况下的初步评估方法。
陈磊