Stan Richards School of Advertising & Public Relations, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Risk Anal. 2023 Jun;43(6):1145-1161. doi: 10.1111/risa.13991. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
This study seeks guidance from the planned risk information avoidance model to explore drivers of risk information avoidance in the context of COVID-19. Data were collected early during the pandemic. Among our most notable results is that participants who are more oriented toward social dominance and are more skeptical of scientists' credibility have (1) more supportive attitudes toward risk information avoidance and (2) feel social pressure to avoid risk information. The findings of this study highlight how the role of skepticism in science and intergroup ideologies, such as social dominance, can have important implications for how people learn about health-related information, even in times of heightened crisis.
本研究旨在借鉴计划风险信息回避模型,探讨 COVID-19 背景下风险信息回避的驱动因素。数据是在大流行早期收集的。我们最显著的结果之一是,那些更倾向于社会支配地位、对科学家可信度更持怀疑态度的参与者(1)对风险信息回避持更支持的态度,(2)感到回避风险信息的社会压力。这项研究的结果强调了科学怀疑论以及社会支配等群体意识形态的作用如何对人们获取与健康相关的信息产生重要影响,即使在危机加剧的时期也是如此。