Starnoni Marta, Pinelli Massimo, Porzani Silvia, Baccarani Alessio, De Santis Giorgio
Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Mar 23;9(3):e3472. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003472. eCollection 2021 Mar.
The aim of the present study was to show that the Infection Risk Index (IRI), based on only 3 factors (wound classification, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and duration of surgery), can be used to standardize selection of infection high-risk patients undergoing different surgical procedures in Plastic Surgery.
In our Division of Plastic Surgery at Modena University Hospital, we studied 3 groups of patients: Group A (122 post-bariatric abdominoplasties), Group B (223 bilateral reduction mammoplasties), and Group C (201 tissue losses with first intention healing). For each group, we compared surgical site infection (SSI) rate and ratio between patients with 0 or 1 risk factors (IRI score 0 or 1) and patients with 2 or 3 risk factors (IRI score 2 or 3).
In group A, patients with IRI score 0-1 showed an SSI Ratio of 2.97%, whereas patients with IRI score 2-3 developed an SSI ratio of 27.27%. In group B, patients with IRI score 0-1 showed an SSI ratio of 2.99%, whereas patients with IRI score 2-3 developed an SSI ratio of 18.18%. In group C, patients with IRI score 0-1 showed an SSI ratio of 7.62%, whereas patients with IRI score 2-3 developed an SSI ratio of 30.77%.
Existing infection risk calculators are procedure-specific and time-consuming. IRI score is simple, fast, and unspecific but is able to identify patients at high or low risk of postoperative infections. Our results suggest the utility of IRI score in refining the infection risk stratification profile in Plastic Surgery.
本研究的目的是表明,仅基于3个因素(伤口分类、美国麻醉医师协会评分和手术持续时间)的感染风险指数(IRI)可用于规范整形外科中接受不同手术的感染高危患者的选择。
在摩德纳大学医院整形外科,我们研究了3组患者:A组(122例减肥后腹壁成形术)、B组(223例双侧乳房缩小术)和C组(201例一期愈合的组织缺损)。对于每组,我们比较了手术部位感染(SSI)率以及具有0或1个风险因素(IRI评分为0或1)的患者与具有2或3个风险因素(IRI评分为2或3)的患者之间的比例。
在A组中,IRI评分为0 - 1的患者SSI比例为2.97%,而IRI评分为2 - 3的患者SSI比例为27.27%。在B组中,IRI评分为0 - 1的患者SSI比例为2.99%,而IRI评分为2 - 3的患者SSI比例为18.18%。在C组中,IRI评分为0 - 1的患者SSI比例为7.62%,而IRI评分为2 - 3的患者SSI比例为30.77%。
现有的感染风险计算器是针对特定手术且耗时的。IRI评分简单、快速且不针对特定手术,但能够识别术后感染高风险或低风险的患者。我们的结果表明IRI评分在完善整形外科感染风险分层方面的实用性。