Research Unit, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Int J Nurs Pract. 2021 Dec;27(6):e12931. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12931. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
This study focuses on hospital-employed researchers, a relatively new staff group. Their job descriptions vary, which may lead to lack of clarity or preparedness regarding their roles and core tasks during a crisis such as COVID-19.
The aim of this study was to explore hospital-employed healthcare researchers' experiences of work during the COVID-19 pandemic.
A qualitative design based on Graneheim and Lundman's latent content analysis of two focus groups with researchers in clinical practice was chosen to explore researchers' experiences of work during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Fifteen hospital researchers participated in two focus groups, divided into predoctoral and postdoctoral researchers. Focus groups were conducted in May 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, using the voice over IP service, Skype®, due to risk of contagion.
'Searching for a new normal during the COVID-19 pandemic' was the main theme during the latent content interpretation, with subthemes of (i) balancing calm and insecurity, (ii) negotiating core tasks and (iii) considering the future.
The 15 researchers tried to balance calm and insecurity within work and family, on standby for the hospital's contingency plan, and in their research tasks. This led them to negotiate their core tasks and to reflect on the changes and consequences for their positions as researchers in clinical practice in the future.
本研究聚焦于医院雇佣的研究人员,这是一个相对较新的员工群体。他们的工作描述各不相同,这可能导致他们在 COVID-19 等危机期间对自己的角色和核心任务缺乏清晰认识或准备。
本研究旨在探讨临床实践中的医院雇佣型医疗保健研究人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的工作经历。
选择了基于 Graneheim 和 Lundman 的对两个焦点小组的潜在内容分析的定性设计,以探讨研究人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的工作经历。
15 名医院研究人员参加了两个焦点小组,分为博士前和博士后研究人员。由于有传染风险,焦点小组于 2020 年 5 月在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用 IP 语音服务 Skype®进行。
“在 COVID-19 大流行期间寻找新常态”是潜在内容解释的主要主题,有三个子主题:(i)平衡平静和不安,(ii)协商核心任务,(iii)考虑未来。
15 名研究人员试图在工作和家庭中平衡平静和不安,随时准备应对医院的应急计划,并完成他们的研究任务。这导致他们协商他们的核心任务,并反思他们在未来作为临床实践中的研究人员的职位变化和后果。