Suppr超能文献

临床试验知情同意书中的文化程度障碍:一项回顾性分析。

The literacy barrier in clinical trial consents: a retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Mirza Fatima N, Wu Eric, Abdulrazeq Hael F, Connolly Ian D, Tang Oliver Y, Zogg Cheryl K, Williamson Theresa, Galamaga Paul F, Roye G Dean, Sampath Prakash, Telfeian Albert E, Qureshi Abrar A, Groff Michael W, Shin John H, Asaad Wael F, Libby Tiffany J, Gokaslan Ziya L, Kohane Isaac S, Zou James, Ali Rohaid

机构信息

Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 13;75:102814. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102814. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Historically, the readability of consent forms in medicine have been above the average reading level of patients. This can create challenges in obtaining truly informed consent, but the implications on clinical trial participant retention are not fully explored. To address this gap, we seek to analyze clinical trial consent forms by determining their readability and relationship with the associated trial's participant dropout rate. Additionally, we explore a potential method for simplifying these forms.

METHODS

We analyzed the readability of consent forms of federally funded interventional clinical trials, which were completed in the United States on or before January 1, 2023, and were posted online and made accessible on ClinicalTrials.gov. We correlated their readability with trial dropout rates. As an exploratory analysis, a subset of these forms was simplified using a large language model, with expert medicolegal review.

FINDINGS

Across 798 included federally funded trials, the mean (±SD) Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of their consent forms was 12.0 ± 1.3, equivalent to a high school graduate reading level and significantly higher than the 8th grade average reading level of adults in the United States (U.S.) (P < 0.001). In risk-adjusted analyses, each additional Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level increase in a clinical trial's consent form was associated with a 16% higher dropout rate (incidence rate ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.22; P < 0.001). Our exploratory analysis of a simplification method showed promising results in lowering the reading level while preserving medicolegal content.

INTERPRETATION

The average readability of informed consent forms of federally funded clinical trials exceeds the reading comprehension skills of the majority of adults in the U.S., potentially undermining clinical trial participant retention rates. Future work should explore the use of large language models and other tools as possible means to close this literacy barrier and potentially enhancing clinical trial participation.

FUNDING

This research received no sources of funding. The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

摘要

背景

从历史上看,医学同意书的可读性一直高于患者的平均阅读水平。这可能在获得真正的知情同意方面带来挑战,但对临床试验参与者留存率的影响尚未得到充分探讨。为了填补这一空白,我们试图通过确定临床试验同意书的可读性及其与相关试验参与者退出率的关系来分析这些同意书。此外,我们探索了一种简化这些表格的潜在方法。

方法

我们分析了2023年1月1日或之前在美国完成并在ClinicalTrials.gov上在线发布且可访问的联邦资助的介入性临床试验同意书的可读性。我们将其可读性与试验退出率进行关联。作为一项探索性分析,使用大语言模型并经医学法律专家审查,对这些表格的一个子集进行了简化。

结果

在纳入的798项联邦资助试验中,其同意书的平均(±标准差)弗莱什-金凯德年级水平为12.0±1.3,相当于高中毕业生的阅读水平,显著高于美国成年人的八年级平均阅读水平(P<0.001)。在风险调整分析中,临床试验同意书的弗莱什-金凯德年级水平每增加一级,退出率就会高出16%(发病率比,1.16;95%置信区间,1.12 - 1.22;P<0.001)。我们对一种简化方法的探索性分析显示,在保留医学法律内容的同时降低阅读水平方面取得了有前景的结果。

解读

联邦资助临床试验的知情同意书的平均可读性超过了美国大多数成年人的阅读理解能力,这可能会降低临床试验参与者的留存率。未来的工作应探索使用大语言模型和其他工具,作为克服这一读写障碍并潜在提高临床试验参与度的可能手段。

资金

本研究未获得资金来源。作者没有利益冲突需要申报。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d2de/11701435/bafa1c16b020/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验