Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jun;5(6):706-715. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01112-w. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
Anti-intellectualism (the generalized distrust of experts and intellectuals) is an important concept in explaining the public's engagement with advice from scientists and experts. We ask whether it has shaped the mass public's response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We provide evidence of a consistent connection between anti-intellectualism and COVID-19 risk perceptions, social distancing, mask usage, misperceptions and information acquisition using a representative survey of 27,615 Canadians conducted from March to July 2020. We exploit a panel component of our design (N = 4,910) to strongly link anti-intellectualism and within-respondent change in mask usage. Finally, we provide experimental evidence of anti-intellectualism's importance in information search behaviour with two conjoint studies (N ~ 2,500) that show that preferences for COVID-19 news and COVID-19 information from experts dissipate among respondents with higher levels of anti-intellectual sentiment. Anti-intellectualism poses a fundamental challenge in maintaining and increasing public compliance with expert-guided COVID-19 health directives.
反智主义(对专家和知识分子的普遍不信任)是解释公众接受科学家和专家建议的一个重要概念。我们想知道它是否影响了公众对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的反应。我们使用 2020 年 3 月至 7 月对 27615 名加拿大代表性调查的证据,证明反智主义与 COVID-19 风险认知、社会距离、口罩使用、误解和信息获取之间存在一致的联系。我们利用设计的面板组件(N=4910),将反智主义与口罩使用的受访者内变化紧密联系起来。最后,我们通过两项联合研究(N~2500)提供了反智主义在信息搜索行为中的重要性的实验证据,这些研究表明,在反智情绪水平较高的受访者中,对 COVID-19 新闻和专家提供的 COVID-19 信息的偏好会消失。反智主义在维持和增加公众对专家指导的 COVID-19 健康指令的遵守方面构成了根本性挑战。