Stubenvoll Marlis
University of Vienna, Austria.
Sci Commun. 2022 Dec;44(6):759-786. doi: 10.1177/10755470221142304.
This panel study in Austria in 2020 ( = 912, = 511) explores distinct audience segments regarding beliefs in misinformation, conspiracy, and evidence statements on COVID-19. I find that citizens fall into seven segments, three of which endorse unsupported claims: The threat skeptics selectively accept misinformation and evidence; the approvers tend to accept all types of information; and the misinformed believe in misinformation and conspiracy statements while rejecting evidence. Further analyses suggest that the misinformed increasingly sought out COVID-19 threat-negating information from scientific sources, while also overall attending to threat-confirming information. These patterns have practical implications for correcting misperceptions.
这项于2020年在奥地利开展的面板研究(样本量n = 912,女性占比511)探讨了在新冠疫情相关错误信息、阴谋论及证据陈述方面不同的受众群体。我发现公民可分为七个群体,其中三个群体认可无根据的说法:威胁怀疑论者有选择地接受错误信息和证据;赞同者倾向于接受所有类型的信息;而被误导者相信错误信息和阴谋论陈述,同时拒绝证据。进一步分析表明,被误导者越来越多地从科学来源寻求否定新冠疫情威胁的信息,同时也总体上关注证实威胁的信息。这些模式对于纠正错误认知具有实际意义。