Suppr超能文献

减少防晒霜中化学紫外线滤光剂在水生环境中的存在:法规、公众意识和其他考虑因素。

Reducing the prevalence of chemical UV filters from sunscreen in aquatic environments: Regulatory, public awareness, and other considerations.

机构信息

Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Sep;17(5):982-988. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4432. Epub 2021 May 25.

Abstract

Given increasing concerns about the persistence and toxic effects of some sunscreen ingredients in aquatic ecosystems, several states, territories, and nations have banned the sale and/or possession of sunscreens containing chemicals of concern. Little is known, however, about the outcomes or effectiveness of these efforts to reduce the prevalence of toxic chemicals in coastal waters. This article reviews the state of knowledge relating to regulatory and other efforts to reduce the impact of chemical ingredients in sunscreens on aquatic ecosystems, focusing on the following questions: To what extent will local legislative restrictions on ingredients actually reduce the concentrations of chemicals in coastal waters and protect aquatic health? Do these legislative measures effectively decrease overall public use of sunscreens containing potentially harmful ingredients, or would other measures, such as local outreach programs, consumer education, or broad-scale ingredient regulation, be more effective? How might restrictions on chemical UV filters impact human health? Although it is still early to assess the outcomes of recent ingredient bans, their effectiveness is limited by the fact that legislation generally applies only to sunscreens sold within the legislating jurisdiction. Public awareness campaigns can be locally effective, but they are hindered by the absence of clear environmental labeling standards for sunscreen. Although retail and industry groups, and many dermatologists, cite concerns that sunscreen ingredient bans might lead to increased incidences of skin cancer, consumer preferences are influenced by a wide range of factors and no studies clearly document whether restrictions on chemical ingredients will cause people to use sun protection less frequently or less effectively. Until more information is available, many consider it prudent to take a precautionary approach to sunscreen regulation supported by broad-scale, consistent regulatory policies and labeling standards that limit chemical ingredients to those considered safe for human use and ecosystem health. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021;17:982-988. © 2021 SETAC.

摘要

由于人们对一些防晒霜成分在水生生态系统中持久性和毒性的担忧日益增加,一些州、地区和国家已禁止销售和/或拥有含有有害化学物质的防晒霜。然而,对于这些减少沿海水域有毒化学物质流行的努力的结果或效果知之甚少。本文综述了与减少防晒霜中化学物质对水生生态系统影响的监管和其他努力相关的知识状况,重点关注以下问题:地方立法限制成分实际上会在多大程度上减少沿海水中化学物质的浓度并保护水生健康?这些立法措施是否能有效地减少公众对含有潜在有害成分的防晒霜的总体使用,或者其他措施,如当地外联计划、消费者教育或广泛的成分监管,是否更有效?对化学紫外线滤光剂的限制会如何影响人类健康?尽管评估最近成分禁令的结果还为时过早,但由于立法通常仅适用于在立法管辖范围内销售的防晒霜,因此其有效性受到限制。公众意识运动在当地可能会产生效果,但由于缺乏明确的防晒霜环境标签标准,这些运动受到阻碍。尽管零售和行业团体以及许多皮肤科医生表示担心,防晒霜成分禁令可能会导致皮肤癌发病率上升,但消费者的偏好受到多种因素的影响,没有研究明确记录限制化学成分是否会导致人们更频繁或更有效地使用防晒产品。在获得更多信息之前,许多人认为谨慎的做法是支持采用广泛一致的监管政策和标签标准来监管防晒霜,这些政策和标准将化学物质限制在被认为对人类使用和生态系统健康安全的范围内。2021 年环境综合评估与管理 17:982-988。©2021 SETAC。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验