• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计划在西班牙低风险妊娠中进行家庭分娩:一项描述性研究。

Planned Home Birth in Low-Risk Pregnancies in Spain: A Descriptive Study.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.

Research Group for Health Sciences CST-451, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 5;18(7):3784. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073784.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18073784
PMID:33916388
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8038591/
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that planned home birth in low-risk pregnancies is a generally safe option. However nowadays, only 0.5 percent of deliveries have been at home in Spain. This study sought to understand the characteristics of planned home births with qualified healthcare professionals in low-risk pregnancies and their results on maternal and neonatal health in the Balearic Islands. The study followed a retrospective descriptive design to investigate planned home births from 1989 to 2019 ( = 820). Sociodemographic data of women, healthcare professional intervention rates, and maternal/fetal morbidity/mortality results were collected. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using the IBM SPSS Version 25 software package. The results indicated that women with low-risk pregnancies who planned home births with a qualified midwife had a higher probability of spontaneous vaginal birth delivery and positive maternal health results. Furthermore, the risk of hospital transfer was low (10.7%) and the rate of prolonged breastfeeding (>1 year) was extremely high (99%). Moreover, the study showed that planned home births can be generally associated with fetal well-being. The conclusions and implications of this study are that planned home births in low-risk pregnancies attended by qualified midwives in the Balearic Islands achieve positive results in both maternal and newborn health, as well as low rates of obstetric intervention.

摘要

先前的研究表明,在低风险妊娠中计划家庭分娩通常是一种安全的选择。然而,如今在西班牙,只有 0.5%的分娩是在家中进行的。本研究旨在了解在低风险妊娠中由合格医疗保健专业人员计划家庭分娩的特征及其对巴利阿里群岛母婴健康的结果。该研究采用回顾性描述性设计,调查了 1989 年至 2019 年期间(=820 例)计划在家分娩的情况。收集了妇女的社会人口统计学数据、医疗保健专业人员干预率以及母婴/胎儿发病率/死亡率结果。使用 IBM SPSS 版本 25 软件包对结果进行了统计分析。结果表明,计划在家中由合格助产士分娩的低风险妊娠妇女,其自然阴道分娩的可能性更高,且母亲健康状况良好。此外,转诊风险较低(10.7%),母乳喂养时间延长(>1 年)的比例极高(99%)。此外,该研究表明,计划家庭分娩通常可以与胎儿健康状况相关。本研究的结论和意义在于,在巴利阿里群岛,由合格助产士为低风险妊娠妇女提供计划家庭分娩,可以在母婴健康方面取得积极成果,且产科干预率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e330/8038591/013c4e1179fc/ijerph-18-03784-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e330/8038591/013c4e1179fc/ijerph-18-03784-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e330/8038591/013c4e1179fc/ijerph-18-03784-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Planned Home Birth in Low-Risk Pregnancies in Spain: A Descriptive Study.计划在西班牙低风险妊娠中进行家庭分娩:一项描述性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 5;18(7):3784. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073784.
2
Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.由注册助产士接生的计划在家分娩与由助产士或医生接生的计划在医院分娩的结局比较。
CMAJ. 2009 Sep 15;181(6-7):377-83. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.081869. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
3
Midwife-attended planned home births versus planned hospital births in Spain: Maternal and neonatal outcomes.导乐陪伴下的计划家中分娩与西班牙计划中的医院分娩:母婴结局。
Midwifery. 2024 Sep;136:104101. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2024.104101. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
4
Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009.美国16924例计划在家分娩的护理结局:北美助产士联盟统计项目,2004年至2009年
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):17-27. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12172. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
5
Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省助产士管理后计划在家分娩与计划在医院分娩的结局
CMAJ. 2002 Feb 5;166(3):315-23.
6
Outcomes associated with planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies.低风险妊娠女性计划分娩地点相关的结局
CMAJ. 2016 Mar 15;188(5):E80-E90. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150564. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
7
Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the type of birth attendant.美国的新生儿死亡率与出生地点(医院与家庭)有关,而与分娩助手的类型无关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):254.e1-254.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.045. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
8
Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications.计划在家分娩:对额外禁忌证的需求。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):401.e1-401.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
9
Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.独立助产士在分娩中心和家中分娩的结局:日本的一项回顾性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2013 Aug;29(8):965-72. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.020. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
10
Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.美国计划在家分娩的围产期风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):350.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse Outcomes in Neonates Following Planned Home Births: A Case Report Series and a Narrative Literature Review.计划在家分娩后新生儿的不良结局:病例报告系列及文献综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 11;14(4):1181. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041181.
2
Exploring Women's Reasons for Choosing Home Birth with the Help of Their Untrained Family Members: A Qualitative Research.探究女性在未经训练的家庭成员帮助下选择家庭分娩的原因:一项定性研究。
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2023 Apr;11(2):72-84. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2023.97491.2186.
3
Characteristics of Homebirth in Hungary: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Maternal outcomes and birth interventions among women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses.与打算在医院分娩的低产科风险女性相比,打算在家分娩的女性的孕产妇结局和分娩干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Apr 5;21:100319. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100319. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Perinatal or neonatal mortality among women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses.与打算在医院分娩的低产科风险女性相比,打算在家分娩的女性围产期或新生儿死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jul 25;14:59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.07.005. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
匈牙利家庭分娩的特征:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 22;19(16):10461. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610461.
4
Comparison of Frequency of Home Births in the Member States of the EU Between 2015 and 2019.2015年至2019年欧盟成员国在家分娩频率的比较
Glob Pediatr Health. 2022 Jan 22;9:2333794X211070916. doi: 10.1177/2333794X211070916. eCollection 2022.
Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000-2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data.2000-2015 年维多利亚州计划性私人家庭分娩:维多利亚围产期数据的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 4;18(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1996-6.
4
Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高收入国家低风险妊娠女性的计划分娩地点与孕产妇及围产期结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Midwifery. 2018 Jul;62:240-255. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
5
'I didn't think you were allowed that, they didn't mention that.' A qualitative study exploring women's perceptions of home birth.“我原以为不允许那样做,他们没有提到过。”一项探索女性对家庭分娩看法的定性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Apr 18;18(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1733-1.
6
Improving the quality and content of midwives' discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: Co-production and evaluation of an intervention package.提高助产士与低风险孕妇就分娩地点选择进行讨论的质量和内容:一项干预方案的共同制定与评估
Midwifery. 2018 Apr;59:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Planned home compared with planned hospital births: mode of delivery and Perinatal mortality rates, an observational study.计划在家分娩与计划在医院分娩的比较:分娩方式和围产期死亡率,一项观察性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 8;17(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1348-y.
8
A comparison of intrapartum interventions and adverse outcomes by parity in planned freestanding midwifery unit and alongside midwifery unit births: secondary analysis of 'low risk' births in the birthplace in England cohort.计划性独立助产单元与附属助产单元分娩中按胎次比较产时干预措施及不良结局:对英格兰出生地队列中“低风险”分娩的二次分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1271-2.
9
Effect of planned place of birth on obstetric interventions and maternal outcomes among low-risk women: a cohort study in the Netherlands.计划分娩地点对低风险女性产科干预措施及孕产妇结局的影响:荷兰的一项队列研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1130-6.
10
Association between home birth and breast feeding outcomes: a cross-sectional study in 28 125 mother-infant pairs from Ireland and the UK.家庭分娩与母乳喂养结果之间的关联:对爱尔兰和英国28125对母婴进行的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 8;6(8):e010551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010551.