Suppr超能文献

医生相关性对颈背痛侵入性治疗结局的影响:常规临床实践中采集数据的多水平分析。

Physician-Related Variability in the Outcomes of an Invasive Treatment for Neck and Back Pain: A Multi-Level Analysis of Data Gathered in Routine Clinical Practice.

机构信息

CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain.

Unidad de Bioestadística, Hospital Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, IDIPHISA, 28222 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 7;18(8):3855. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083855.

Abstract

Neuro-reflexotherapy (NRT) is a proven effective, invasive treatment for neck and back pain. To assess physician-related variability in results, data from post-implementation surveillance of 9023 patients treated within the Spanish National Health Service by 12 physicians were analyzed. Separate multi-level logistic regression models were developed for spinal pain (SP), referred pain (RP), and disability. The models included all patient-related variables predicting response to NRT and physician-related variables. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Median Odds Ratio (MOR) were calculated. Adjusted MOR (95% CI) was 1.70 (1.47; 2.09) for SP, 1.60 (1.38; 1.99) for RP, and 1.65 (1.42; 2.03) for disability. Adjusted ICC (95%CI) values were 0.08 (0.05; 0.15) for SP, 0.07 (0.03; 0.14) for RP, and 0.08 (0.04; 0.14) for disability. In the sensitivity analysis, in which the 6920 patients treated during the physicians' training period were excluded, adjusted MOR was 1.38 (1.17; 1.98) for SP, 1.37 (1.12; 2.31) for RP, and 1.25 (1.09; 1.79) for disability, while ICCs were 0.03 (0.01; 0.14) for SP, 0.03 (0.00; 0.19) for RP, and 0.02 (0.00; 0.10) for disability. In conclusion, the variability in results obtained by different NRT-certified specialists is reasonable. This suggests that current training standards are appropriate.

摘要

神经反射疗法(NRT)是一种经过验证的有效、有创的治疗颈背痛的方法。为了评估医生相关的结果变异性,对 12 名医生在西班牙国家卫生服务体系中治疗的 9023 名患者的实施后监测数据进行了分析。为脊柱疼痛(SP)、牵涉痛(RP)和残疾分别建立了多水平逻辑回归模型。模型纳入了所有预测 NRT 反应的患者相关变量和医生相关变量。计算了组内相关系数(ICC)和中位数优势比(MOR)。调整后的 MOR(95%CI)分别为 SP 1.70(1.47;2.09)、RP 1.60(1.38;1.99)和残疾 1.65(1.42;2.03)。调整后的 ICC(95%CI)值分别为 SP 0.08(0.05;0.15)、RP 0.07(0.03;0.14)和残疾 0.08(0.04;0.14)。在敏感性分析中,排除了 6920 名在医生培训期间接受治疗的患者,调整后的 MOR 分别为 SP 1.38(1.17;1.98)、RP 1.37(1.12;2.31)和残疾 1.25(1.09;1.79),而 ICC 分别为 SP 0.03(0.01;0.14)、RP 0.03(0.00;0.19)和残疾 0.02(0.00;0.10)。总之,不同 NRT 认证专家的结果变异性是合理的。这表明当前的培训标准是合适的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0876/8067591/7614ff7708d8/ijerph-18-03855-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验