• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How Self-Control Predicts Moral Decision Making: An Exploratory Study on Healthy Participants.自我控制如何预测道德决策:健康参与者的探索性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 6;18(7):3840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073840.
2
Evidence for a dissociation between moral reasoning and moral decision-making in Tourette syndrome.图雷特综合征中道德推理和道德决策之间的分离证据。
J Neuropsychol. 2024 Jun;18(2):217-225. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12350. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
3
Heart rate correlates of utilitarian moral decision-making in alcoholism.酒精中毒患者功利道德决策的心率相关性。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Dec 1;133(2):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.06.023. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
4
Stress alters personal moral decision making.压力会改变个人的道德决策。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012 Apr;37(4):491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
5
European Portuguese adaptation and validation of dilemmas used to assess moral decision-making.用于评估道德决策的困境的欧洲葡萄牙语改编及验证
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2018 Apr 5;40(1):38-46. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0022. Print 2018 Mar.
6
If it makes you feel bad, don't do it! Egoistic rather than altruistic empathy modulates neural and behavioral responses in moral dilemmas.如果这让你感觉不好,那就别做!在道德困境中,利己而非利他的同理心会调节神经和行为反应。
Physiol Behav. 2014 May 10;130:127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
7
Moral reasoning, moral decision-making, and empathy in Korsakoff's syndrome.科萨科夫综合征的道德推理、道德决策和同理心。
J Neuropsychol. 2021 Sep;15(3):462-476. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12233. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
8
Moral rigidity in obsessive-compulsive disorder: do abnormalities in inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility and disgust play a role?强迫症中的道德僵化:抑制控制、认知灵活性和厌恶异常是否起作用?
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;45(1):152-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Moral decision making under modafinil: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover fMRI study.莫达非尼对道德决策的影响:一项随机安慰剂对照双盲交叉 fMRI 研究。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Sep;236(9):2747-2759. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05250-y. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
10
A dose of ruthlessness: interpersonal moral judgment is hardened by the anti-anxiety drug lorazepam.一剂铁石心肠:抗焦虑药物劳拉西泮使人际道德判断更加冷酷。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Aug;142(3):612-20. doi: 10.1037/a0030256. Epub 2012 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Timing matters! Academic assessment changes throughout the day.时间很重要!学术评估在一天中会有所变化。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 24;16:1605041. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1605041. eCollection 2025.
2
Current status and influencing factors of empathy and moral decision-making among Chinese clinical intern nurses - a cross-sectional study.中国临床实习护士共情与道德决策的现状及影响因素——一项横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):751. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03352-x.
3
Editorial: The social brain: new insights from social, clinical, and biological psychology.社论:社会大脑:来自社会、临床和生物心理学的新见解。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 29;16:1552456. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1552456. eCollection 2025.
4
Bilinguals on the footbridge: the role of foreign-language proficiency in moral decision making.天桥上的双语者:外语能力在道德决策中的作用。
Biling (Camb Engl). 2024 Apr 25:1-16. doi: 10.1017/S1366728924000312.
5
The Role of Serotonin in Fear Learning and Memory: A Systematic Review of Human Studies.血清素在恐惧学习与记忆中的作用:对人体研究的系统综述
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 12;13(8):1197. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081197.
6
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for the Modulation of Aggressive Behavior-A Systematic Review of Randomized Sham-Controlled Studies.用于调节攻击行为的非侵入性脑刺激——随机假对照研究的系统评价
Life (Basel). 2023 May 20;13(5):1220. doi: 10.3390/life13051220.
7
Case report: Changes in defense mechanisms, personality functioning, and body mass index during psychotherapy with patients with anorexia nervosa.病例报告:神经性厌食症患者心理治疗期间防御机制、人格功能及体重指数的变化
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 20;14:1081467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1081467. eCollection 2023.
8
Mindfulness and Defense Mechanisms as Explicit and Implicit Emotion Regulation Strategies against Psychological Distress during Massive Catastrophic Events.正念和防御机制作为明确和内隐的情绪调节策略,以应对大规模灾难性事件期间的心理困扰。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 4;19(19):12690. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912690.
9
Can we rewire criminal mind via non-invasive brain stimulation of prefrontal cortex? Insights from clinical, forensic and social cognition studies.我们能否通过对前额叶皮层进行非侵入性脑刺激来重塑罪犯的思维?来自临床、法医和社会认知研究的见解。
Curr Psychol. 2022 May 16:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03210-y.
10
Editorial: Psychological Factors as Determinants of Medical Conditions, Volume II.社论:作为医疗状况决定因素的心理因素,第二卷
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 21;13:865235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865235. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Hunger Bias or Gut Instinct? Responses to Judgments of Harm Depending on Visceral State Versus Intuitive Decision-Making.饥饿偏见还是直觉本能?对伤害判断的反应取决于内脏状态与直觉决策。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:2261. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02261. eCollection 2020.
2
Indignation for moral violations suppresses the tongue motor cortex: preliminary TMS evidence.道德违规引发的愤怒抑制了舌尖运动皮层:初步 TMS 证据。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 Feb 3;17(1):151-159. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa036.
3
The Dark Triad and the Detection of Parental Judicial Manipulators. Development of a Judicial Manipulation Scale.黑暗人格三联征与父母司法操纵者的识别。司法操纵量表的编制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 21;17(8):2843. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082843.
4
Moral incongruence and compulsive sexual behavior: Results from cross-sectional interactions and parallel growth curve analyses.道德不一致与强迫性性行为:来自横断面交互作用和并行增长曲线分析的结果。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Apr;129(3):266-278. doi: 10.1037/abn0000501. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
5
Self-reported and neurocognitive impulsivity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症患者的自我报告和神经认知冲动性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;97:152155. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152155. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
The relationship between impulsivity and shame and guilt proneness on the prediction of internalizing and externalizing behaviors.冲动性与羞耻感和内疚倾向在预测内化和外化行为方面的关系。
Heliyon. 2019 Nov 14;5(11):e02746. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02746. eCollection 2019 Nov.
7
Revenge among Parents Who Have Broken up Their Relationship through Family Law Courts: Its Dimensions and Measurement Proposal.离异父母在家庭法庭中的报复行为:维度及其测量建议。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 6;16(24):4950. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16244950.
8
Cognitive-Emotional and Inhibitory Deficits as a Window to Moral Decision-Making Difficulties Related to Exposure to Violence.认知-情感与抑制缺陷:洞察与暴力暴露相关的道德决策困难的窗口
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 17;10:1427. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01427. eCollection 2019.
9
Defining Compulsive Behavior.定义强迫行为。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2019 Mar;29(1):4-13. doi: 10.1007/s11065-019-09404-9. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
The Influence of Self-Relevance and Cultural Values on Moral Orientation.自我相关性和文化价值观对道德取向的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 28;10:292. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00292. eCollection 2019.

自我控制如何预测道德决策:健康参与者的探索性研究。

How Self-Control Predicts Moral Decision Making: An Exploratory Study on Healthy Participants.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Science, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 6;18(7):3840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073840.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18073840
PMID:33917567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8038791/
Abstract

Research on moral reasoning calls into question self-control, which encompasses impulsivity, compulsivity, and inhibitory control. However, a thorough investigation exploring how these three dimensions can affect moral reasoning in response to different scenarios is unavailable. We addressed this topic by testing the predictive role of these three dimensions of self-control on appraisals for ethical violations related with different types of scenarios. Overall, our results suggest that all three dimensions of self-control are involved in moral reasoning, depending on the type of appraisal and provided moral scenarios.

摘要

道德推理研究对自我控制提出了质疑,自我控制包括冲动、强迫和抑制控制。然而,目前还没有深入探讨这三个维度如何影响对不同情景下的道德推理。我们通过测试这三个自我控制维度对与不同类型情景相关的道德违规评估的预测作用来解决这个问题。总的来说,我们的结果表明,所有三个维度的自我控制都参与了道德推理,这取决于评估的类型和提供的道德情景。