Suppr超能文献

阿西环酯红霉素和硬脂酸红霉素在特应性皮炎患者急性皮肤感染中的疗效和耐受性。

Efficacy and tolerability of erythromycin acistrate and erythromycin stearate in acute skin infections of patients with atopic eczema.

作者信息

Salo O P, Gordin A, Brandt H, Antikainen R

机构信息

Department of Allergic Diseases, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jun;21 Suppl D:101-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/21.suppl_d.101.

Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of a new erythromycin derivative, erythromycin acistrate (EA), were compared with that of erythromycin stearate (ES) in 42 patients with infected atopic eczema. The dosage of EA was 400 mg tid and that of ES 500 mg tid. The duration of treatment ranged from five to 12 days. The patients were hospitalized and evaluated before treatment and on the last day in hospital. The infective pathogen was usually Staphylococcus aureus in both groups. Without local antibacterial treatment both drugs eradicated the bacteria in more than 60% of the cases. Gastrointestinal side effects were frequently reported with both drugs, more often in the ES- than in the EA-group, but the difference was only statistically significant (p less than 0.05) with respect to diarrhoea. One patient in each group discontinued treatment because of gastrointestinal side effects. No elevations in liver enzymes of clinical significance were reported in either group.

摘要

在42例感染性特应性皮炎患者中,对一种新的红霉素衍生物阿西红霉素(EA)与硬脂酸红霉素(ES)的疗效和耐受性进行了比较。EA的剂量为每日3次,每次400mg;ES的剂量为每日3次,每次500mg。治疗持续时间为5至12天。患者在治疗前及住院最后一天进行了住院评估。两组的感染病原体通常均为金黄色葡萄球菌。在未进行局部抗菌治疗的情况下,两种药物在超过60%的病例中均清除了细菌。两种药物均频繁报告有胃肠道副作用,ES组比EA组更常见,但仅腹泻方面的差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。每组各有1例患者因胃肠道副作用而中断治疗。两组均未报告具有临床意义的肝酶升高情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验