Suppr超能文献

阿奇霉素、红霉素和氯唑西林治疗皮肤及相关软组织感染。欧洲阿奇霉素研究组。

Azithromycin, erythromycin and cloxacillin in the treatment of infections of skin and associated soft tissues. European Azithromycin Study Group.

作者信息

Daniel R

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, Pfizer Central Research, Sandwich, UK.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1991 Nov-Dec;19(6):433-45. doi: 10.1177/030006059101900602.

Abstract

Azithromycin (total dose 1.5 g) given orally in five or six doses over 5 days was compared with erythromycin and cloxacillin both given orally as 500 mg four times daily for 7 days in two multicentre studies of patients with skin and associated soft-tissue infections. Azithromycin eradicated baseline pathogen(s), mainly Staphylococcus aureus, in 89% compared with in 78%, of erythromycin-treated patients (P = 0.501) and in 78% compared with in 59% of cloxacillin-treated patients (P = 0.421). No statistically significant difference in clinical cure was reported between azithromycin (74%) and erythromycin (75%, P = 1.00) and between azithromycin (60%) and cloxacillin (47%, P = 0.301) treatment groups. The side-effects reported for azithromycin were mainly mild or moderate gastro-intestinal complaints and there were no major abnormalities in laboratory parameters. It is concluded that azithromycin was as effective as, but better tolerated than, either erythromycin or cloxacillin and short-course therapy may improve patient compliance.

摘要

在两项针对皮肤及相关软组织感染患者的多中心研究中,将口服阿奇霉素(总剂量1.5克,分五或六剂在5天内服用)与口服红霉素和氯唑西林(均为每日4次,每次500毫克,服用7天)进行了比较。阿奇霉素清除基线病原体(主要是金黄色葡萄球菌)的比例为89%,相比之下,红霉素治疗组为78%(P = 0.501);阿奇霉素组为78%,相比之下,氯唑西林治疗组为59%(P = 0.421)。在临床治愈率方面,阿奇霉素组(74%)与红霉素组(75%,P = 1.00)以及阿奇霉素组(60%)与氯唑西林组(47%,P = 0.301)之间均未报告有统计学显著差异。阿奇霉素报告的副作用主要为轻度或中度胃肠道不适,实验室参数未出现重大异常。结论是阿奇霉素与红霉素或氯唑西林疗效相当,但耐受性更好,短程疗法可能会提高患者的依从性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验