Majcen Rosker Ziva, Vodicar Miha, Kristjansson Eythor
Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Centre, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Apr 22;11(5):752. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050752.
Visual disturbances are commonly reported in patients with neck pain. Smooth pursuit neck torsion (SPNT) test performed in neutral position and with trunk rotated under the stationary head has been used to discriminate between those with cervical component and those without. However, no studies investigated the reliability of the SPNT-test in patients with chronic neck pain and healthy controls. The aim of this study was to assess inter-visit reliability of the SPNT-test while applying different amplitudes and velocities of target movement. Thirty-two controls and thirty-one patients were enrolled in the study. The SPNT-test was performed in neutral position and through 45° torsion positions. The test was performed at 20°/s, 30°/s and 40°/s velocities and at 30°, 40° and 50° amplitudes of cyclic sinusoidal target movements. Interclass correlation coefficient and smallest detectable change were calculated for parameters of gain and SPNT-differences. In patients, moderate to good reliability was observed for gain at 40° and 50° amplitudes and for 20°/s and 30°/s velocities, while moderate to excellent reliability for gain was observed in controls. Both groups presented with moderate to good reliability for SPNT-difference. Our findings imply that amplitudes of 40° and 50° and velocities of 20°/s and 30°/s are the most reliable and should be applied in future studies assessing oculomotor functions during the SPNT test.
颈部疼痛患者常报告有视觉障碍。在中立位以及头部固定、躯干旋转的情况下进行的平稳跟踪颈部扭转(SPNT)试验,已被用于区分有颈椎病变的患者和无颈椎病变的患者。然而,尚无研究调查SPNT试验在慢性颈部疼痛患者和健康对照者中的可靠性。本研究的目的是在应用不同幅度和速度的目标运动时,评估SPNT试验的访间可靠性。32名对照者和31名患者纳入了本研究。SPNT试验在中立位以及通过45°扭转位进行。试验以20°/秒、30°/秒和40°/秒的速度以及30°、40°和50°的循环正弦目标运动幅度进行。计算了增益参数和SPNT差异的组内相关系数和最小可检测变化。在患者中,观察到40°和50°幅度以及20°/秒和30°/秒速度下增益的可靠性为中等至良好,而在对照者中观察到增益的可靠性为中等至优秀。两组的SPNT差异均表现出中等至良好的可靠性。我们的研究结果表明,40°和50°的幅度以及20°/秒和30°/秒的速度是最可靠的,应在未来评估SPNT试验期间动眼功能的研究中应用。