• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者直接口服抗凝剂的处方:19798 例门诊患者的观察性研究。

The prescription of direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly: An observational study of 19 798 Ambulatory subjects.

机构信息

"Pôle Personnes Âgées", Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, Dijon, France.

"Mutualité Sociale Agricole" of Burgundy, Dijon, France.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Jan;74(1):e13420. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13420. Epub 2019 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1111/ijcp.13420
PMID:31532052
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly prescribed to elderly people, but the epidemiologic data for this population remains scarce. We compared the elderly population taking DOACs and those not taking DOACs (noDOAC).

METHOD

We included individuals over 75 years old, affiliated to Mutualité Sociale Agricole of Burgundy (a French regional health insurance agency), who had been refunded for a prescribed DOAC between 1st and 30th September 2017. The DAOC group (DAOCG) and noDOAC group (noDOACG) were compared in terms of demographic conditions, registered chronic diseases (RCD), and number and types of prescribed drugs. In the DOACG, we compared the type of prescribing physician and laboratory monitoring for novel prescriptions (initial) and prescription refills (≥ 3 months).

RESULTS

Of the 19 798 included patients, 1518 (7.7%) were prescribed DAOCs and 18 280 (92.3%) were not. Mean and median age was 85 years in the 2 groups (DOACG and noDOACG). In the DOACG, there were more men (50% vs 40.2%), more RCD (88.9% vs 68.7%) and more drugs per prescription (6 ± 2.8 vs 5 ± 2.9) (All P < .01). The DOACG also took more antihypertensive drugs. The most commonly prescribed DOACs were apixaban (42.9%) followed by rivaroxaban (38.4%) and dabigatran (18.6%). Complete blood count, serum creatinine and coagulation function tests were requested for 69.4%, 75% and 22.2%, respectively, of patients prescribed DAOCs.

CONCLUSIONS

The DOACG had more RCD and drugs per prescription than the noDOACG; routine laboratory monitoring was insufficient. What's known Platelet aggregation inhibitors (low-dose) are recommended for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in patients suffering from symptomatic atherosclerosis. The main risk of this treatment is bleeding. What's new A prescription for platelet aggregation inhibitors was found in 34% of geriatric inpatients in this prospective study. Compliance to guidelines was better for symptomatic peripheral artery disease than for primary prevention in accordance with recent publications. Geriatric comorbidities had no impact on the prescription of platelet aggregation inhibitors. Underuse of platelet aggregation inhibitors was observed in 11.3% of cases and overuse in 13.7% of cases.

摘要

目的

直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)越来越多地用于老年人,但针对该人群的流行病学数据仍然很少。我们比较了服用 DOAC 和未服用 DOAC(非 DOAC)的老年人。

方法

我们纳入了年龄在 75 岁以上、参加勃艮第 Mutualité Sociale Agricole(法国地区健康保险公司)的个体,他们在 2017 年 9 月 1 日至 30 日期间被开具 DOAC 处方。DOAC 组(DOACG)和非 DOAC 组(noDOACG)在人口统计学条件、登记的慢性疾病(RCD)以及开具的药物数量和类型方面进行了比较。在 DOACG 中,我们比较了新型处方(初始)和处方续开(≥3 个月)的开具医生类型和实验室监测情况。

结果

在 19798 名纳入患者中,有 1518 名(7.7%)服用 DOAC,18280 名(92.3%)未服用 DOAC。两组(DOACG 和 noDOACG)的平均和中位数年龄均为 85 岁。在 DOACG 中,男性更多(50% vs 40.2%),RCD 更多(88.9% vs 68.7%),处方药物数量更多(6 ± 2.8 对 5 ± 2.9)(均 P<.01)。DOACG 还服用了更多的降压药物。最常开具的 DOAC 是阿哌沙班(42.9%),其次是利伐沙班(38.4%)和达比加群(18.6%)。开具 DOAC 的患者中,分别有 69.4%、75%和 22.2%的患者要求进行全血细胞计数、血清肌酐和凝血功能检查。

结论

DOACG 比 noDOACG 有更多的 RCD 和处方药物;常规实验室监测不足。

已知

血小板聚集抑制剂(低剂量)推荐用于有症状动脉粥样硬化患者的心血管事件二级预防。这种治疗的主要风险是出血。

新内容

在这项前瞻性研究中,34%的老年住院患者开具了血小板聚集抑制剂处方。根据最近的出版物,对于有症状的外周动脉疾病,遵循指南的依从性优于一级预防。老年合并症对血小板聚集抑制剂的开具没有影响。在 11.3%的病例中观察到血小板聚集抑制剂的使用不足,在 13.7%的病例中观察到过度使用。

相似文献

1
The prescription of direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly: An observational study of 19 798 Ambulatory subjects.老年患者直接口服抗凝剂的处方:19798 例门诊患者的观察性研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Jan;74(1):e13420. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13420. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
2
Comparison of Prescribing Practices with Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulant Protocols.直接口服抗凝药物治疗方案的处方实践比较。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2017 Dec;17(6):475-479. doi: 10.1007/s40256-017-0243-2.
3
The Prescription of Vitamin K Antagonists in a Very Old Population: A Cross-Sectional Study of 8696 Ambulatory Subjects Aged Over 85 Years.非常高龄人群中维生素 K 拮抗剂的处方:8696 名 85 岁以上门诊患者的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 14;17(18):6685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186685.
4
Quality of direct oral anticoagulant prescribing in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results from a large urban health system.老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者直接口服抗凝药物处方的质量:来自大型城市卫生系统的结果。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Jul;46(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1651-0.
5
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older.80 岁及以上患者的直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 22;18(9):4443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094443.
6
The speed of adoption of new drugs and prescription volume after the amendments in reimbursement coverage: the case of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in South Korea.医保报销范围调整后新药采用速度和处方量:以韩国非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂为例。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 27;20(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08929-6.
7
Burden of Inappropriate Prescription of Direct Oral Anticoagulants at Hospital Admission and Discharge in the Elderly: A Prospective Observational Multicenter Study.老年患者住院和出院时直接口服抗凝剂不适当处方的负担:一项前瞻性观察性多中心研究。
Drugs Aging. 2019 Nov;36(11):1047-1055. doi: 10.1007/s40266-019-00710-8.
8
Switching to Another Oral Anticoagulant and Drug Discontinuation Among Elderly Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated With Different Direct Oral Anticoagulants.不同直接口服抗凝药物治疗的老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者转换为另一种口服抗凝药物和停药情况。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019 Jan-Dec;25:1076029619870249. doi: 10.1177/1076029619870249.
9
National Trends in Ambulatory Oral Anticoagulant Use.门诊口服抗凝剂使用的全国趋势。
Am J Med. 2015 Dec;128(12):1300-5.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.05.044. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
10
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Individuals Aged 80 Years and Older: An Overview in 2021.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂在 80 岁及以上人群中的应用:2021 年概述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1448. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021448.

引用本文的文献

1
A Look at Primary and Secondary Prevention in the Elderly: The Two Sides of the Same Coin.老年人的一级预防与二级预防:同一枚硬币的两面
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 25;13(15):4350. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154350.
2
Inappropriate Use of Oral Antithrombotic Combinations in an Outpatient Setting and Associated Risks: A French Nationwide Cohort Study.门诊环境中口服抗血栓药物联合使用不当及其相关风险:一项法国全国性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2021 May 27;10(11):2367. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112367.
3
Oral Anticoagulants Preference in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis or Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.
急性深静脉血栓形成或非瓣膜性心房颤动住院患者口服抗凝剂的偏好
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Oct 15;8(4):404. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040404.
4
Impact of a Prescription Support Tool to Improve Adherence to the Guidelines for the Prescription of Oral Antithrombotics: The Combi-AT Randomized Controlled Trial Using Clinical Vignettes.一种处方支持工具对提高口服抗血栓药物处方指南依从性的影响:使用临床病例的Combi-AT随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2019 Nov 8;8(11):1919. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111919.