• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队情绪构成对虚拟团队成员的幸福感至关重要吗?团队情绪管理干预的作用。

Is Team Emotional Composition Essential for Virtual Team Members' Well-Being? The Role of a Team Emotional Management Intervention.

机构信息

Social Psychology Department, University of Seville, 41004 Sevilla, Spain.

Research Institute IDOCAL, University of Valencia, 46010 València, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 25;18(9):4544. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094544.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18094544
PMID:33922929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8123308/
Abstract

The aim of this study was twofold. First, we examined the relationship between virtual teams' emotional intelligence composition and three indicators of their members' well-being, members' satisfaction with the team, and positive and negative affective states. Second, we analyzed the moderator role of an online team emotional management intervention in the effects of the team emotional intelligence composition. One hundred and two virtual teams participated in an experimental study with repeated measures. Teams were randomly assigned to either an intervention designed to help them detect and manage emotions during virtual teamwork or a control condition (with no intervention). We followed a hierarchical data strategy and examined a number of nested models using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. Our findings showed that virtual teams' emotional intelligence composition is a key driver of the team members' well-being, and that a team emotional management intervention moderated the impact of the team composition of emotional intelligence, buffering its influence.

摘要

本研究旨在达成两个目标。首先,我们考察了虚拟团队的情商构成与其成员幸福感的三个指标(成员满意度、积极和消极情感状态)之间的关系。其次,我们分析了在线团队情绪管理干预对团队情商构成的影响的调节作用。102 个虚拟团队参与了一项具有重复测量的实验研究。团队被随机分配到干预组或对照组(无干预)。我们采用分层数据策略,使用层次线性建模对多个嵌套模型进行了检验。我们的研究结果表明,虚拟团队的情商构成是团队成员幸福感的关键驱动因素,并且团队情绪管理干预调节了情商团队构成的影响,缓冲了其影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d99/8123308/76510e301938/ijerph-18-04544-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d99/8123308/76510e301938/ijerph-18-04544-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d99/8123308/76510e301938/ijerph-18-04544-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Is Team Emotional Composition Essential for Virtual Team Members' Well-Being? The Role of a Team Emotional Management Intervention.团队情绪构成对虚拟团队成员的幸福感至关重要吗?团队情绪管理干预的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 25;18(9):4544. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094544.
2
The Effect of Empathy on Team Members' Moqi in Virtual Teams: A Moderated Mediation Model.同理心对虚拟团队中团队成员默契的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Jul 12;16:2619-2633. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S414860. eCollection 2023.
3
Team behaviors as antecedents for team members' work engagement in interdisciplinary health care teams.团队行为作为跨学科医疗团队中团队成员工作投入的前因。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 4;14:1196154. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196154. eCollection 2023.
4
The impact of team empowerment on proactivity: the moderating roles of leader's emotional intelligence and proactive personality.团队授权对主动性的影响:领导情绪智力和主动性人格的调节作用。
J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26(4-5):560-77. doi: 10.1108/14777261211256918.
5
Team members' emotional displays as indicators of team functioning.团队成员的情绪表现作为团队功能的指标。
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(1):134-49. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1039494. Epub 2015 May 26.
6
Using an Educational Intervention to Map our Surgical Teams' Function, Emotional Intelligence, Communication and Conflict Styles.运用教育干预来绘制我们手术团队的职能、情绪智力、沟通和冲突风格图。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Sep;80(9):1277-1286. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
7
Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: a moderated mediation study.工作团队中连接功能失调行为与绩效的情感机制:一项有调节的中介研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Sep;93(5):945-58. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.945.
8
Team Emotional Intelligence: Emotional Processes as a Link Between Managers and Workers.团队情商:作为管理者与员工之间纽带的情感过程
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 24;12:619999. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619999. eCollection 2021.
9
Effects of Team Emotional Authenticity on Virtual Team Performance.团队情感真实性对虚拟团队绩效的影响。
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 31;7:1336. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01336. eCollection 2016.
10
Visualized Automatic Feedback in Virtual Teams.虚拟团队中的可视化自动反馈
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 16;10:814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00814. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The Happy-Productive Worker Model and Beyond: Patterns of Wellbeing and Performance at Work.快乐-产出型员工模型及其他:工作中的幸福感和绩效模式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 6;16(3):479. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030479.
2
Psychometric properties of WLEIS as a measure of emotional intelligence in the Portuguese and Spanish medical students.作为葡萄牙和西班牙医学生情商测量工具的韦氏情绪智力量表(WLEIS)的心理测量特性。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Oct;58:152-159. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
3
Positive affective tone and team performance: The moderating role of collective emotional skills.
积极情感基调与团队绩效:集体情绪技能的调节作用。
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(1):167-82. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1043857. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
4
How do feelings influence effort? An empirical study of entrepreneurs' affect and venture effort.情绪如何影响努力程度?一项关于企业家情感与创业努力的实证研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):1086-94. doi: 10.1037/a0015599.
5
Human abilities: emotional intelligence.人类能力:情商。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:507-36. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646.
6
Work group diversity.工作团队多样性。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:515-41. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546.
7
A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria.一类似然准则的广义分布理论。
Biometrika. 1949 Dec;36(3-4):317-46.
8
How do respondents construe ambiguous response formats of affect items?受访者如何解读情感项目的模糊回答格式?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):956-68. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.956.
9
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
10
Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition?在情绪识别方面是否存在内群体优势?
Psychol Bull. 2002 Mar;128(2):243-9. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.243.