• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 Android 的老年人驾驶风险自评 (SAFE-DR) 应用程序的开发:混合方法研究。

Development of an Android-Based Self-Report Assessment for Elderly Driving Risk (SAFE-DR) App: Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Wonkwang University Gwangju Medical Center, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

Department of Occupational Therapy, Gwangju Women's University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 17;9(6):e25310. doi: 10.2196/25310.

DOI:10.2196/25310
PMID:33934068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8277309/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-report assessments for elderly drivers are used in various countries for accessible, widespread self-monitoring of driving ability in the elderly population. Likewise, in South Korea, a paper-based Self-Report Assessment for Elderly Driving Risk (SAFE-DR) has been developed. Here, we implemented the SAFE-DR through an Android app, which provides the advantages of accessibility, convenience, and provision of diverse information, and verified its reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVE

This study tested the validity and reliability of a mobile app-based version of a self-report assessment for elderly persons contextualized to the South Korean culture and compared it with a paper-based test.

METHODS

In this mixed methods study, we recruited and interviewed 567 elderly drivers (aged 65 years and older) between August 2018 and May 2019. For participants who provided consent, the app-based test was repeated after 2 weeks and an additional paper-based test (Driver 65 Plus test) was administered. Using the collected data, we analyzed the reliability and validity of the app-based SAFE-DR. The internal consistency of provisional items in each subdomain of the SAFE-DR and the test-retest stability were analyzed to examine reliability. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to examine the validity of the subdomain configuration. To verify the appropriateness of using an app-based test for older drivers possibly unfamiliar with mobile technology, the correlation between the results of the SAFE-DR app and the paper-based offline test was also analyzed.

RESULTS

In the reliability analysis, Cronbach α for all items was 0.975 and the correlation of each item with the overall score ranged from r=0.520 to r=0.823; 4 items with low correlations were removed from each of the subdomains. In the retest after 2 weeks, the mean correlation coefficient across all items was r=0.951, showing very high reliability. Exploratory factor analysis on 40 of the 44 items established 5 subdomains: on-road (8 items), coping (16 items), cognitive functions (5 items), general conditions (8 items), and medical health (3 items). A very strong negative correlation of -0.864 was observed between the total score for the app-based SAFE-DR and the paper-based Driver 65 Plus with decorrelation scales. The app-based test was found to be reliable.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we developed an app-based self-report assessment tool for elderly drivers and tested its reliability and validity. This app can help elderly individuals easily assess their own driving skills. Therefore, this assessment can be used to educate drivers and for preventive screening for elderly drivers who want to renew their driver's licenses in South Korea. In addition, the app can contribute to safe driving among elderly drivers.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8532/8277309/bc44d2c43931/mhealth_v9i6e25310_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8532/8277309/9b933dd6cd08/mhealth_v9i6e25310_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8532/8277309/bc44d2c43931/mhealth_v9i6e25310_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8532/8277309/9b933dd6cd08/mhealth_v9i6e25310_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8532/8277309/bc44d2c43931/mhealth_v9i6e25310_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

自我报告评估被用于不同国家,以方便、广泛地监测老年人的驾驶能力。同样,在韩国,也开发了一种基于纸质的《老年人驾驶风险自我报告评估》(SAFE-DR)。在这里,我们通过一个安卓应用程序实现了 SAFE-DR,它具有可及性、便利性和提供多样化信息的优势,并验证了其可靠性和有效性。

目的

本研究测试了一款基于移动应用程序的自我报告评估工具的可靠性和有效性,该工具针对韩国文化进行了调整,并将其与纸质测试进行了比较。

方法

在这项混合方法研究中,我们于 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 5 月期间招募并采访了 567 名老年驾驶员(年龄在 65 岁及以上)。对于同意参加的参与者,在 2 周后重复进行基于应用程序的测试,并进行了额外的纸质测试(Driver 65 Plus 测试)。使用收集的数据,我们分析了基于应用程序的 SAFE-DR 的可靠性和有效性。分析了 SAFE-DR 每个子域中暂定项目的内部一致性和测试重测稳定性,以检验可靠性。进行了探索性因素分析,以检验子域配置的有效性。为了验证对于可能不熟悉移动技术的老年驾驶员使用基于应用程序的测试的适当性,还分析了 SAFE-DR 应用程序和纸质离线测试结果之间的相关性。

结果

在可靠性分析中,所有项目的 Cronbach α 为 0.975,每个项目与总分的相关性范围为 r=0.520 至 r=0.823;每个子域中删除了 4 个相关性较低的项目。在 2 周后的重测中,所有项目的平均相关系数 r=0.951,显示出非常高的可靠性。对 44 个项目中的 40 个进行的探索性因素分析确定了 5 个子域:路测(8 个项目)、应对(16 个项目)、认知功能(5 个项目)、一般情况(8 个项目)和医疗健康(3 个项目)。基于应用程序的 SAFE-DR 的总分与去相关量表的纸质 Driver 65 Plus 之间存在非常强的负相关,为-0.864。基于应用程序的测试被发现是可靠的。

结论

本研究开发了一种基于应用程序的老年驾驶员自我报告评估工具,并对其可靠性和有效性进行了测试。该应用程序可以帮助老年人轻松评估自己的驾驶技能。因此,该评估可用于教育驾驶员,并为希望在韩国更新驾驶执照的老年驾驶员进行预防性筛查。此外,该应用程序可以为老年驾驶员的安全驾驶做出贡献。

相似文献

1
Development of an Android-Based Self-Report Assessment for Elderly Driving Risk (SAFE-DR) App: Mixed Methods Study.基于 Android 的老年人驾驶风险自评 (SAFE-DR) 应用程序的开发:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 17;9(6):e25310. doi: 10.2196/25310.
2
Development of a Web-Based Mini-Driving Scene Screening Test (MDSST) for Clinical Practice in Driving Rehabilitation.基于网络的迷你驾驶场景筛查测试(MDSST)在驾驶康复临床实践中的开发。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;19(6):3582. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063582.
3
The Persian Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS-Fa): Translation and Validation Study.移动应用程序评分量表波斯语版本(MARS-Fa):翻译与验证研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Dec 5;6(12):e42225. doi: 10.2196/42225.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the PsyMate Scale Using a Smartphone App: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.使用智能手机应用程序的 PsyMate 量表韩国版的心理计量学特性:生态瞬间评估研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 21;8(7):e17926. doi: 10.2196/17926.
5
User-Centered Development of a Mobile App for Biopsychosocial Pain Assessment in Adults: Usability, Reliability, and Validity Study.以用户为中心的成人生物心理社会疼痛评估移动应用程序的开发:可用性、可靠性和有效性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 14;9(5):e25316. doi: 10.2196/25316.
6
Validation of a Korean version of mobile app rating scale (MARS) for apps targeting disease management.验证一款针对疾病管理的移动应用程序评分量表(MARS)的韩文版本。
Health Informatics J. 2022 Jan-Mar;28(0):14604582221091975. doi: 10.1177/14604582221091975.
7
[The application of driver stress inventory in Chinese drivers and its reliability and validity test].[驾驶员压力量表在中国驾驶员中的应用及其信效度检验]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Mar 6;56(3):365-369. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20211125-01087.
8
Aiding medical professionals in fitness-to-drive screenings for elderly drivers: development of an office-based screening tool.辅助医疗专业人员对老年驾驶员进行适合驾驶的体检:开发一种基于办公室的筛查工具。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Aug;30(8):1211-1225. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217002678. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
9
Response Time as an Implicit Self-Schema Indicator for Depression Among Undergraduate Students: Preliminary Findings From a Mobile App-Based Depression Assessment.反应时间作为大学生抑郁的内隐自我图式指标:基于移动应用的抑郁评估的初步发现。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Sep 13;7(9):e14657. doi: 10.2196/14657.
10
Performance-based driving evaluation of the elderly driver: safety, reliability, and validity.老年驾驶员基于表现的驾驶评估:安全性、可靠性和有效性。
J Gerontol. 1994 Jul;49(4):M153-9. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.4.m153.

引用本文的文献

1
On the road to retirement: Predicting nighttime driving difficulty and cessation using self-reported health factors.在退休之路上:利用自我报告的健康因素预测夜间驾驶困难及停止驾驶情况。
J Transp Health. 2024 Jan;34. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2023.101724. Epub 2023 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Aging barriers influencing mobile health usability for older adults: A literature based framework (MOLD-US).老龄化障碍影响老年人使用移动健康的可用性:基于文献的框架(MOLD-US)。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Jun;114:66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
2
Cognitive Decline and Older Driver Crash Risk.认知能力下降与老年驾驶员碰撞风险。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul;66(6):1075-1081. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15378. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
3
Transportation and Aging: An Updated Research Agenda to Advance Safe Mobility among Older Adults Transitioning From Driving to Non-driving.
交通与老龄化:推进从驾驶到非驾驶过渡的老年人群安全出行的更新研究议程。
Gerontologist. 2019 Mar 14;59(2):215-221. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx120.
4
Driver license renewal policies and fatal crash involvement rates of older drivers, United States, 1986-2011.1986 - 2011年美国老年驾驶员的驾照更新政策与致命撞车事故参与率
Inj Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;1(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40621-014-0025-0. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
5
Driving performance comparing older versus younger drivers.老年驾驶员与年轻驾驶员的驾驶性能比较。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Jan 2;18(1):41-46. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1194980. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
6
Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements.现实条件下克朗巴哈α信度的最佳替代方法:同属与不对称测量
Front Psychol. 2016 May 26;7:769. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769. eCollection 2016.
7
Assessment tools predicting fitness to drive in older adults: a systematic review.预测老年人驾驶适宜性的评估工具:一项系统综述
Am J Occup Ther. 2014 Nov-Dec;68(6):670-80. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2014.011833.
8
Using mobile phones in healthcare management for the elderly.在老年人医疗保健管理中使用手机。
Maturitas. 2014 Dec;79(4):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
9
Driving avoidance by older adults: is it always self-regulation?老年人的驾驶回避:是否总是自我调节?
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Aug;57:96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
10
Giving up the keys: how driving cessation affects engagement in later life.放弃驾驶:停止驾驶如何影响晚年生活的参与度。
Gerontologist. 2014 Jun;54(3):423-33. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt037. Epub 2013 May 7.