Feasibility of equivalent performance of 3D TOF [F]-FDG PET/CT with reduced acquisition time using clinical and semiquantitative parameters.

BACKGROUND

High-performance time-of-flight (TOF) positron emission tomography (PET) systems have the capability for rapid data acquisition while preserving diagnostic image quality. However, determining a reliable and clinically applicable cut-off of the acquisition time plays an important role in routine practice. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic equivalence of short acquisition time of 57 with routine 75 seconds per bed position (s/BP) of [F]-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) PET. Phantom studies applying EARL criteria suggested the feasibility of shortened acquisition time in routine clinical imaging by 3D TOF PET/CT scanners. Ninety-six patients with melanoma, lung or head and neck cancer underwent a standard whole-body, skull base-to-thigh or vertex-to-thigh [F]-FDG PET/CT examination using the 3D TOF Ingenuity TF PET/CT system (Philips, Cleveland, OH). The [F]-FDG activity applied was equal to 4MBq per kg body weight. Retrospectively, PET list-mode data were used to calculate a second PET study per patient with a reduced acquisition time of 57 s instead of routine 75 s/BP. PET/CT data were reconstructed using a 3D OSEM TOF algorithm. Blinded patient data were analysed by two nuclear medicine physicians. The number of [F]-FDG-avid lesions per body region (head&neck, thorax, abdomen, bone, extremity) and image quality (grade 1-5) were evaluated. Semiquantitative analyses were performed by standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements using 3D volume of interests (VOI). The visual and semiquantitative diagnostic equivalence of 214 [F]-FDG-avid lesions were analysed in the routine standard (75 s/BP) as well as the calculated PET/CT studies with short acquisition time. Statistical analyses were performed by equivalence testing and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Lesion detection rate per patient's body region agreed in > 98% comparing 57 s/BP and 75 s/BP datasets. Overall image quality was determined as equal or superior to 75 s in 80% and 69%, respectively. In the semiquantitative lesion-based analyses, a significant equivalence was found between the 75 s/BP and 57 s/BP PET/CT images both for SUV (p = 0.004) and SUV (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate significant clinical and semiquantitative equivalence between short acquisition time of 57 s/BP and standard 75 s/BP 3D TOF [F]-FDG PET/CT scanning, which may improve the patient's workflow in routine practice.